Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 13, pp 9557–9566 | Cite as

Microwave Synthesis of Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 Composite with Improved Photocatalytic Ability Using SnCl4 as a Protector

  • Rui Chen
  • Juan Lu
  • Zuoshan Wang
  • Qingqing Zhou
  • Min Zheng
Composites
  • 235 Downloads

Abstract

Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 composites were successfully prepared with a facile microwave synthesis method. The structure of Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 composite was studied by morphology characterizations, such as X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, which showed that the size of the Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 particles is 20–50 nm. The synthesis mechanism revealed that SnCl4 obstructed between Cu(OH) and ethylene glycol, preventing Cu(OH) being reduced into Cu at high temperature. The photocatalytic property of Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 composite was investigated by degrading the mixed dyestuff under the irradiation of visible light at room temperature. Benefiting from the effect of electron transfer, the photocatalytic performance of the microwave-prepared Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 composite was much better than that of pure Cu2O. The possible photocatalytic mechanism of the Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 composite catalysts was proposed and elaborated in this study. This synthesis of Cu/Cu2O/SnO2 composite may provide a method for other Cu2O/semiconductor composites microwave preparation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a key project for Industry-Academia Research in Jiangsu Province (BY2016043-01).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyjoo Y et al (2017) A review on photocatalysis for air treatment: from catalyst development to reactor design. Chem Eng J 310(Part 2):537–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friehs E et al (2016) Toxicity, phototoxicity and biocidal activity of nanoparticles employed in photocatalysis. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 29(Supplement C):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li F et al (2017) Enhanced removal of azo dye using modified PAN nanofibrous membrane Fe complexes with adsorption/visible-driven photocatalysis bifunctional roles. Appl Surf Sci 404(Supplement C):206–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Molinari A et al (2017) Degradation of emerging concern contaminants in water by heterogeneous photocatalysis with Na4W10O32. Appl Catal B Environ 203(Supplement C):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spasiano D et al (2015) Solar photocatalysis: Materials, reactors, some commercial, and pre-industrialized applications. A comprehensive approach. Appl Catal B Environ 170–171(Supplement C):90–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang W et al (2016) Au/Cu2O Schottky contact heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity in dye decomposition and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation. J Alloys Compd 684(Supplement C):445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tadjarodi A, Akhavan O, Bijanzad K (2015) Photocatalytic activity of CuO nanoparticles incorporated in mesoporous structure prepared from bis(2-aminonicotinato) copper(II) microflakes. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25(11):3634–3642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xu H, Wang W, Zhu W (2006) Shape evolution and size-controllable synthesis of Cu2O octahedra and their morphology-dependent photocatalytic properties. J Phys Chem B 110(28):13829–13834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang MH, Naresh G, Chen H-S (2017) Facet-dependent electrical, photocatalytic, and optical properties of semiconductor crystals and their implications for applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(1):4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang Y et al (2010) Shape effects of Cu2O polyhedral microcrystals on photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 114(11):5073–5079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng Z et al (2009) Crystal faces of Cu2O and their stabilities in photocatalytic reactions. J Phys Chem C 113(32):14448–14453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinojosa-Reyes M et al (2017) Hydrogen production by tailoring the brookite and Cu2O ratio of sol–gel Cu-TiO2 photocatalysts. Chemosphere 184(Supplement C):992–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lakhera SK et al (2017) Facile synthesis of Fe2O3/Cu2O nanocomposite and its visible light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of cationic dyes. Res Chem Intermed 43(9):5091–5102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang L et al (2010) High efficient photocatalytic degradation of p-nitrophenol on a unique Cu2O/TiO2 p-n heterojunction network catalyst. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7641–7646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lalitha K et al (2010) Highly stabilized and finely dispersed Cu2O/TiO2: a promising visible sensitive photocatalyst for continuous production of hydrogen from glycerol: water mixtures. J Phys Chem C 114(50):22181–22189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou B et al (2009) Experimental study on photocatalytic activity of Cu2O/Cu nanocomposites under visible light. Catal Lett 132(1):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu L et al (2015) Creation of Cu2O@TiO2 composite photocatalysts with p–n heterojunctions formed on exposed Cu2O facets, their energy band alignment study, and their enhanced photocatalytic activity under illumination with visible light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(3):1465–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hong W et al (2017) Antibacterial and photocatalytic properties of Cu2O/ZnO composite film synthesized by electrodeposition. Res Chem Intermed 43(4):2517–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ng CHB, Fan WY (2006) Shape evolution of Cu2O nanostructures via kinetic and thermodynamic controlled growth. J Phys Chem B 110(42):20801–20807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuo C-H, Huang MH (2008) Facile synthesis of Cu2O nanocrystals with systematic shape evolution from cubic to octahedral structures. J Phys Chem C 112(47):18355–18360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ho J-Y, Huang MH (2009) Synthesis of submicrometer-sized Cu2O crystals with morphological evolution from cubic to hexapod structures and their comparative photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 113(32):14159–14164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu H et al (2007) Template-free hydrothermal synthesis of CuO/Cu2O composite hollow microspheres. Chem Mater 19(17):4327–4334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan Y et al (2007) Controllable fabrication and electrical performance of single crystalline Cu2O nanowires with high aspect ratios. Nano Lett 7(12):3723–3728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ponyatovskii EG et al (2002) Nanocrystalline Cu2O prepared under high pressures. Phys Solid State 44(5):852–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    He P, Shen X, Gao H (2005) Size-controlled preparation of Cu2O octahedron nanocrystals and studies on their optical absorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 284(2):510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhosale MA, Bhatte KD, Bhanage BM (2013) A rapid, one pot microwave assisted synthesis of nanosize cuprous oxide. Powder Technol 235(Supplement C):516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu F-K et al (2005) Formation of silver nanorods by microwave heating in the presence of gold seeds. J Cryst Growth 273(3):439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhatte KD et al (2010) Microwave-assisted additive free synthesis of nanocrystalline zinc oxide. Powder Technol 203(2):415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bhatte KD et al (2012) Additive free microwave assisted synthesis of nanocrystalline Mg(OH)2 and MgO. Particuology 10(3):384–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuo CY et al (2014) Preparation of immobilized Cu2O using microwave irradiation and its catalytic activity for bisphenol A: comparisons of Cu2O/H2O2 and visible-light/Cu2O/H2O2 systems. Water Sci Technol 70(8):1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bhosale MA, Bhanage BM (2017) A simple, additive free approach for synthesis of Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles: effect of precursors in morphology selectivity. J Cluster Sci 28(3):1215–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li H et al (2017) Free-standing and flexible Cu/Cu2O/CuO heterojunction net: a novel material as cost-effective and easily recycled visible-light photocatalyst. Appl Catal B Environ 207(Supplement C):134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang D-J et al (2010) Ultrasensitive and highly selective gas sensors based on electrospun SnO2 nanofibers modified by Pd loading. Adv Func Mater 20(24):4258–4264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chen R et al (2018) The preparation of Cu2O@Au yolk/shell structures for efficient photocatalytic activity with a self-generated acid etching method. J Mater Sci 53(3):1781–1790.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1614-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceSoochow UniversitySoochowChina
  2. 2.College of Textile and Clothing EngineeringSoochow UniversitySoochowChina

Personalised recommendations