Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 6313–6324 | Cite as

Comparative investigation of hydroxyapatite/collagen composites prepared by CaCl2 addition at different time points in collagen self-assembly process

  • Honghong Bu
  • Guoying Li


Mineralization of collagen is a common combination process mainly involving collagen self-assembly and hydroxyapatite formation. Previous measurement of turbidity showed that collagen self-assembly follows the nucleation–growth model. In the present study, 1.0 M CaCl2 was mixed with 0.6 mg/mL collagen solution in PBS (10 mM phosphate, 80 mM NaCl, pH 7.2, and T = 35 °C) at the beginning of the lag period, at the beginning of the growth period, at t1/2 (the time to reach half of the total turbidity change), and during the plateau period. Four different hydroxyapatite/collagen (HAp/COL) composites were prepared [COL (1), COL (2), COL (3), and COL (4)]. The optical densities increased with CaCl2 addition, and a wave trough appeared in the mineralization kinetic curves because of amorphous/crystalline conversion. HAp formation was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction measurements. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy results showed that the calcium/phosphorus ratio of COL (2) is close to that of human bone. Images obtained by scanning electron microscopy revealed that nanosized plate-like HAp of COL (2) formed and became uniformly embedded in collagen, whereas HAp formed large clusters in COL (1), COL (3), and COL (4). Quantitation analyses of collagen and HAp incorporated into composites showed that mineralization at different time points promote collagen fibril generation and have little impact on the HAp content. These results suggest that the composite fabricated by addition of CaCl2 at the beginning of the growth period is a promising material for bone repair and implantation.



This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21776184 and 21476147).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    Bauer TW, Muschler GF (2000) Bone graft materials: an over-view of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:10–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland J, Hilibrand AS et al (2003) Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 28(2):134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bos CD, Goldberg VM, Zika JM, Heiple KG, Powell AE (1983) Immune responses of rate to frozen bone allograft. J Bone Jt Surg 65(2):239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kadler KE, Holmes DF, Trotter JA, Chapman JA (1996) Collagen fibril formation. Biochem J 316(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cui FZ, Li Y, Ge J (2007) Self-assembly of mineralized collagen composites. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 57(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bozec L, Heijden G, Horton M (2007) Collagen fibrils: nanoscale ropes. Biophys J 92(1):70–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu WB, Qu SX, Shen R, Jiang CX, Li XH, Feng B et al (2006) Influence of pH values on preparation of hydroxyapatite/gelatin composites. J Mater Sci 41:1851–1853. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson R, Watson M (1952) Collagen-crystal relationships in bone as seen in the electron microscope. Anat Rec 114(3):383–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robinson RA (1952) An electron-microscopic study of the crystalline inorganic component of bone and its relationship to the organic matrix. J Bone Jt Surg 34(2):389–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernandez-Moran H, Engström A (1957) Electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction of bone. Biochem Biophys Acta 23:260–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deshpande AS, Beniash E (2008) Bioinspired synthesis of mineralized collagen fibrils. Cryst Growth Des 8:3084–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander B, Daulton TL, Genin GM, Lipner J, Pasteris JD, Wopenka B et al (2012) The nanometre-scale physiology of bone: steric modelling and scanning transmission electron microscopy of collagen-mineral structure. J R Soc Interface 9:1774–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhowmik R, Katti KS, Katti DR (2007) Mechanics of molecular collagen is influenced by hydroxyapatite in natural bone. J Mater Sci 42:8795–8803. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nair AK, Gautieri A, Chang SW, Buehler MJ (2013) Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nat Commun 4:1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mann S (1993) Molecular tectonics in biomineralization and biomimetic materials chemistry. Nature 365(6446):499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jee SS, Culver L, Li YP, Douglas EP, Gower LB (2010) Biomimetic mineralization of collagen via an enzyme-aided PILP process. J Cryst Growth 312:1249–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tampieri A, Celotti G, Landi E, Sandri M, Roveri N, Falini G (2003) Biologically inspired synthesis of bone-like composite: self-assembled collagen fibers/hydroxyapatite nanocrystals. J Biomater Mater Res A 67:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang W, Huang ZL, Liao SS, Cui FZ (2003) Nucleation sites of calcium phosphate crystals during collagen mineralization. J Am Ceram Soc 86:1052–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cui FZ, Wang Y, Cai Q, Zhang W (2008) Conformation change of collagen during the initial stage of biomineralization of calcium phosphate. J Mater Chem 18:3835–3840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gelman RA, Williams BR, Piez KA (1979) Collagen fibril formation. Evidence for a multistep process. J Biol Chem 254:180–186Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tian H, Li C, Liu W, Li J, Li G (2013) The influence of chondroitin 4-sulfate on the reconstitution of collagen fibrils in vitro. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 105:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yuan L, Veis A (1973) The self-assembly of collagen molecules. Biopolymers 12:1437–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams BR, Gelman RA, Poppke DC, Piez KA (1978) Collagen fibril formation. Optimal in vitro conditions and preliminary kinetic results. J Biol Chem 253:6578–6585Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kobayashi K, Ito T, Hoshino T (1985) Electron microscopic demonstration of acid-labile, 4D-staggered intermolecular association of collagen formed in vitro. Collagen Relat Res 5:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bernengo JC, Herbage D, Marion C, Roux B (1978) Intermolecular interactions studies on native and enzyme-treated acidsoluble collagen. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Protein Struct 532:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silver FH, Langley KH, Trelstad RL (1979) Type I collagen fibrillogenesis: initiation via a reversible linear growth step. Biopolymers 18:2523–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christiansen DL, Huang EK, Silver FH (2000) Assembly of type I collagen: fusion of fibril subunits and the influence of fibril diameter on mechanical properties. Matrix Biol 19:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silver FH, Freeman JW, Seehra GP (2003) Collagen self-assembly and the development of tendon mechanical properties. J Biomech 36:1529–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yang H, Deng Y, Xu S, Liu W, Li G (2017) Investigation on the interaction of collagen molecules in solution with different acetic acid concentrations. J Appl Polym Sci 134:45255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tian ZH, Li CH, Duan L, Li GY (2014) Physicochemical properties of collagen solutions cross-linked by glutaraldehyde. Connect Tissue Res 55:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li ZR, Wang B, Chi CF, Zhang QH, Gong YD, Tang JJ et al (2013) Isolation and characterization of acid soluble collagens and pepsin soluble collagens from the skin and bone of Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorous niphonius). Food Hydrocoll 31:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hayashi T, Nagai Y (1974) Factors affecting the interactions of collagen molecules as observed by in vitro fibril formation. J Biochem 76:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cui W, Li X, Xie C, Zhuang H, Zhou S, Weng J (2010) Hydroxyapatite nucleation and growth mechanism on electrospun fibers functionalized with different chemical groups and their combinations. Biomaterials 31:4620–4629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thien DVH, Hsiao SW, Ho MH, Li CH, Shih JL (2013) Electrospun chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanofibers for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci 48:1640–1645. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Niu X, Fan R, Tian F, Guo X, Li P, Feng Q et al (2017) Calcium concentration dependent collagen mineralization. Mater Sci Eng C 73:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kim HM (2003) Ceramic bioactivity and related biomimetic strategy. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 7:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ji J, Bar-On B, Wagner HD (2012) Mechanics of electrospun collagen and hydroxyapatite/collagen nanofibers. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 13:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rubin MA, Jasiuk I, Taylor J, Rubin J, Ganey T, Apkarian RP (2003) TEM analysis of the nanostructure of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone. Bone 33:270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cai Y, Liu Y, Yan W, Hu Q, Tao J, Zhang M et al (2007) Role of hydroxyapatite nanoparticle size in bone cell proliferation. J Mater Chem 17:3780–3787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kong X, Sun X, Cui F, Ma C (2006) Effect of solute concentration on fibroin regulated biomineralization of calcium phosphate. Mater Sci Eng C 26:639–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ma J (2014) A molecular dynamics study on the nucleation of calcium phosphate regulated by collagen. J Mater Sci 49:3099–3106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Orgel LE (2006) Geothermal synthesis and metabolism. Astrobiology 6:297–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Orgel J, San Antonio JD, Antipova O (2011) Molecular and structural mapping of collagen fibril interactions. Connect Tissue Res 52:2–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu K, Li G (2015) Investigation of the lag period of collagen fibrillogenesis using fluorescence anisotropy. Appl Spectrosc 69:1121–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li Y, Douglas EP (2013) Effects of various salts on structural polymorphism of reconstituted type I collagen fibrils. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 112(3):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weinstock A, King PC, Wuthier RE (1967) The ion-binding characteristics of reconstituted collagen. Biochem J 102:983–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bensusan HB, Hoyt BL (1958) The effect of various parameters on the rate of formation of fibers from collagen solutions. J Am Chem Soc 80:719–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wild M, Pomp W, Koenderink GH (2013) Thermal memory in self-assembled collagen fibril networks. Biophys J 105(1):200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather ManufactureSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Leather Chemistry and Engineering (Ministry of Education)Sichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations