Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 7017–7029 | Cite as

Recycled polyethylene terephthalate/carbon nanotube composites with improved processability and performance

  • Ravindra Reddy Chowreddy
  • Katrin Nord-Varhaug
  • Florian Rapp
Polymers

Abstract

Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) nanocomposites containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were prepared through melt compounding via masterbatch dilution method. The masterbatch and the nanocomposites were processed in a twin-screw extruder. The rheological, morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of the PET–CNT nanocomposites have been investigated. Incorporation of CNTs into recycled PET at low concentration (0.25 wt%) significantly increases the viscosity. The storage modulus and loss modulus of nanocomposites were also increased with increasing amount of CNTs. This effect was more pronounced at lower frequencies. The incorporated CNTs in recycled PET increase the degree of crystallinity and crystallization temperature through heterogenous nucleation. Thermal stability and glass transition temperature of PET–CNT nanocomposites were slightly higher than the reference recycled PET. The tensile strength and modulus of PET–CNT nanocomposites increased even at low concentrations of CNTs. Morphological investigation through scanning electron microscopy indicated homogeneous dispersion of CNTs at lower concentrations. At higher concentrations, the CNTs tend to agglomerate due to nanotube–nanotube interactions.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) under Grant Agreement No. 309985. The authors would like to thank the Smithers Rapra, UK, for their support with GPC analysis on the samples.

References

  1. 1.
    Byrne MT, Gun’ko YK (2010) Recent advances in research on carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Adv Mater 22:1672–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moniruzzaman M, Winey KI (2006) Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 39:5194–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paul D, Robeson LM (2008) Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer 49:3187–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okada A, Usuki A (2006) Twenty years of polymer–clay nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1449–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW (2010) Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 43:6515–6530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zaman I, Manshoor B, Khalid A, Araby S (2014) From clay to graphene for polymer nanocomposites—a survey. J Polym Res 21:429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ (2013) Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science 339:535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee KY, Park S-J, Lee WR (2015) A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 21:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dalton AB, Collins S, Munoz E, Razal JM, Ebron VH, Ferraris JP et al (2003) Super-tough carbon-nanotube fibres. Nature 423:703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishihara T, Kawahara A, Nishiguchi H, Yoshio M, Takita Y (2001) Effects of synthesis condition of graphitic nanocabon tube on anodic property of Li-ion rechargeable battery. J Power Sources 97:129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fan S, Chapline MG, Franklin NR, Tombler TW, Cassell AM, Dai H (1999) Self-oriented regular arrays of carbon nanotubes and their field emission properties. Science 283:512–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kong J, Franklin NR, Zhou C, Chapline MG, Peng S, Cho K et al (2000) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287:622–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu C, Fan Y, Liu M, Cong H, Cheng H, Dresselhaus MS (1999) Hydrogen storage in single-walled carbon nanotubes at room temperature. Science 286:1127–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peponi L, Puglia D, Torre L, Valentini L, Kenny JM (2014) Processing of nanostructured polymers and advanced polymeric based nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 85:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang C, Guo Z-X, Fu S, Wu W, Zhu D (2004) Polymers containing fullerene or carbon nanotube structures. Prog Polym Sci 29:1079–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirsch A (2002) Functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:1853–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bellayer S, Gilman JW, Eidelman N, Bourbigot S, Flambard X, Fox DM et al (2005) Preparation of homogeneously dispersed multiwalled carbon nanotube/polystyrene nanocomposites via melt extrusion using trialkyl imidazolium compatibilizer. Adv Funct Mater 15:910–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim JY, Choi HJ, Kang CS, Kim SH (2010) Influence of modified carbon nanotube on physical properties and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanocomposite. Polym Compos 31:858–869Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim JY, Kim SH (2012) High performance PET/carbon nanotube nanocomposites: preparation, characterization, properties and applications. In: Nanocomposites—new trends and developments. InTechGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim JY, Park HS, Kim SH (2007) Multiwall-carbon-nanotube-reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanocomposites by melt compounding. J Appl Polym Sci 103:1450–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mallakpour S, Behranvand V (2017) Application of recycled PET/carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotube composites for Cd2+ adsorption from aqueous solution: a study of morphology, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity. Colloid Polym Sci 295:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mallakpour S, Behranvand V (2016) Manufacture and characterization of nanocomposite materials obtained from incorporation of d-glucose functionalized MWCNTs into the recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate). Des Monomers Polym 19:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hejazi I, Seyfi J, Sadeghi GMM, Davachi SM (2011) Assessment of rheological and mechanical properties of nanostructured materials based on thermoplastic olefin blend and organoclay. Mater Des 32:649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hu G, Zhao C, Zhang S, Yang M, Wang Z (2006) Low percolation thresholds of electrical conductivity and rheology in poly(ethylene terephthalate) through the networks of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymer 47:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seo M-K, Park S-J (2004) Electrical resistivity and rheological behaviors of carbon nanotubes-filled polypropylene composites. Chem Phys Lett 395:44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bai J, Goodridge RD, Hague RJ, Song M, Okamoto M (2014) Influence of carbon nanotubes on the rheology and dynamic mechanical properties of polyamide-12 for laser sintering. Polym Test 36:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta A, Choudhary V (2013) Rheologic and mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes-reinforced poly(trimethylene terephthalate) composites. J Mater Sci 48:3347–3356.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-7025-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu D, Zhou C, Hong Z, Mao D, Bian Z (2005) Study on rheological behaviour of poly(butylene terephthalate)/montmorillonite nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 41:2199–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Du F, Scogna RC, Zhou W, Brand S, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2004) Nanotube networks in polymer nanocomposites: rheology and electrical conductivity. Macromolecules 37:9048–9055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Imai Y, Inukai Y, Tateyama H (2003) Properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/layered silicate nanocomposites prepared by two-step polymerization procedure. Polym J Tokyo 35:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ou CF, Ho MT, Lin JR (2003) The nucleating effect of montmorillonite on crystallization of PET/montmorillonite nanocomposite. J Polym Res 10:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manchado ML, Valentini L, Biagiotti J, Kenny J (2005) Thermal and mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes–polypropylene composites prepared by melt processing. Carbon 43:1499–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kong Y, Hay J (2003) Multiple melting behaviour of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer 44:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anand KA, Agarwal U, Joseph R (2006) Carbon nanotubes induced crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer 47:3976–3980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ou CF (2003) Nanocomposites of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) with organoclay. J Appl Polym Sci 89:3315–3322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Park C, Ounaies Z, Watson KA, Crooks RE, Smith J, Lowther SE et al (2002) Dispersion of single wall carbon nanotubes by in situ polymerization under sonication. Chem Phys Lett 364:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Corcione CE, Frigione M (2012) Characterization of nanocomposites by thermal analysis. Materials 5:2960–2980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang X-S, Li X-G, Yan D (2000) Thermal decomposition kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate). Polym Degrad Stab 69:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jin SH, Park Y-B, Yoon KH (2007) Rheological and mechanical properties of surface modified multi-walled carbon nanotube-filled PET composite. Compos Sci Technol 67:3434–3441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wong M, Paramsothy M, Xu X, Ren Y, Li S, Liao K (2003) Physical interactions at carbon nanotube–polymer interface. Polymer 44:7757–7764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Frankland S, Harik VM (2003) Analysis of carbon nanotube pull-out from a polymer matrix. Surf Sci 525:L103–L108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norner Research ASStathelleNorway
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Chemical Technology ICTPfinztalGermany

Personalised recommendations