Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 6785–6795 | Cite as

ZnO/rGO/C composites derived from metal–organic framework as advanced anode materials for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries

  • Yuan Wang
  • Qijiu Deng
  • Weidong Xue
  • Zou Jian
  • Rui Zhao
  • Juanjuan Wang
Energy materials

Abstract

A novel ZnO/reduced graphene oxide/carbon (ZnO/rGO/C) composite is synthesized by pyrolysis of Zn-based metal–organic framework where graphene oxide and the glucose are imported as carbon sources. As a result, ZnO nanoparticles dispersing on a uniform reduced graphene sheet with a thin carbon layer construct a unique structure, which can prevent the aggregation of ZnO, enhance the electronic conductivity, and offer a robust scaffold during electrochemical processes. Compared to the bare ZnO and ZnO/rGO, the obtained ZnO/rGO/C composite can exhibit a high reversible capacity (~ 830 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles, approximately 85% of theoretical capacity), and superior rate capability as anodes for Li-ion battery. Additionally, the electrochemical property of ZnO-based materials for Na-ion batteries is also proposed for the first time. It demonstrates that the as-synthesized ZnO/rGO/C composite also delivers an outperformance cyclic stability and considerable reversible capacity (~ 300 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles). This simple methodology can be further extended to other energy storage applications.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Science Foundation of Xi’an University of Technology in China No. 101-451117007 and Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 51707153).

References

  1. 1.
    Armand M, Tarascon JM (2008) Building better batteries. Nature 451:652–657.  https://doi.org/10.1038/451652a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang H, Li K, Tao Y et al (2017) Smooth ZnO:Al-AgNWs composite electrode for flexible organic light-emitting device. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:77–83.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-1841-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Skompska M, Zarebska K (2014) Electrodeposition of ZnO nanorod arrays on transparent conducting substrates-a review. Electrochim Acta 127:467–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu L, Zhang D, Zhang Q et al (2017) Smartphone-based sensing system using ZnO and graphene modified electrodes for VOCs detection. Biosens Bioelectron 93:94–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang H, Pan Q, Cheng Y, Zhao J, Yin G (2009) Evaluation of ZnO nanorod arrays with dandelion-like morphology as negative electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 54:2851–2855.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wei D, Xu Z, Wang J et al (2017) A one-pot thermal decomposition of C4H4ZnO6 to ZnO@carbon composite for lithium storage. J Alloy Compd 714:13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu J, Li Y, Ding R et al (2009) Carbon/ZnO nanorod array electrode with significantly improved lithium storage capability. J Phys Chem C 113:5336–5339.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9034612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shen X, Mu D, Chen S, Wu B, Wu F (2013) Enhanced electrochemical performance of ZnO-loaded/porous carbon composite as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 5:3118–3125.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am400020n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gan QM, Zhao KM, Liu SQ, He Z (2017) MOF-derived carbon coating on self-supported ZnCo2O4-ZnO nanorod arrays as high-performance anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Sci 52:7768–7780.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1043-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ning Y, Lou X, Shen M, Hu B (2017) Mesoporous cobalt 2,5-thiophenedicarboxylic coordination polymer for high performance Na-ion batteries. Mater Lett 197:245–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slater MD, Kim D, Lee E, Johnson CS (2013) Sodium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 23:947–958.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201200691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wen J-W, Zhang D-W, Zang Y et al (2014) Li and Na storage behavior of bowl-like hollow Co3O4 microspheres as an anode material for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 132:193–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang X, Li D, Zhu G, Lu T, Pan L (2017) Porous CoFe2O4 nanocubes derived from metal–organic frameworks as high-performance anode for sodium ion batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci 499:145–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li D, Yan D, Zhang X, Li J, Lu T, Pan L (2017) Porous CuO/reduced graphene oxide composites synthesized from metal–organic frameworks as anodes for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci 497:350–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.03.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu KJ, Liu G, Wang YJ et al (2017) Metal-organic frameworks derived novel hierarchical durian-like nickel sulfide (NiS2) as an anode material for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Mater Lett 197:180–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosi NL, Eckert J, Eddaoudi M et al (2003) Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 300:1127–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu Q-L, Li J, Xu Q (2013) Immobilizing metal nanoparticles to metal–organic frameworks with size and location control for optimizing catalytic performance. J Am Chem Soc 135:10210–10213.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja403330m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee J, Farha OK, Roberts J, Scheidt KA, Nguyen ST, Hupp JT (2009) Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 38:1450–1459.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b807080f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ke F, Yuan Y-P, Qiu L-G et al (2011) Facile fabrication of magnetic metal–organic framework nanocomposites for potential targeted drug delivery. J Mater Chem 21:3843–3848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pramanik S, Zheng C, Zhang X, Emge TJ, Li J (2011) New microporous metal–organic framework demonstrating unique selectivity for detection of high explosives and aromatic compounds. J Am Chem Soc 133:4153–4155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ge L, Zhou W, Rudolph V, Zhu Z (2013) Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with size-reduced Cu-BTC for improved gas separation. J Mater Chem A 1:6350–6358.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta11131h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee KJ, Kim T-H, Kim TK, Lee JH, Song H-K, Moon HR (2014) Preparation of Co3O4 electrode materials with different microstructures via pseudomorphic conversion of Co-based metal-organic frameworks. J Mater Chem A 2:14393–14400.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta02501f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang L, Yan B, Zhang J, Liu Y, Yuan A, Yang G (2016) Design and self-assembly of metal–organic framework-derived porous Co3O4 hierarchical structures for lithium-ion batteries. Ceram Int 42:5160–5170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park KS, Ni Z, Côté AP et al (2006) Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:10186–10191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang G, Zhang L, Zhang F, Wang L (2014) Metal–organic framework derived Fe2O3@NiCo2O4 porous nanocages as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Nanoscale 6:5509–5515.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr06041a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang G, Zhang F, Du X, Qin Y, Yin D, Wang L (2015) Metal organic frameworks route to in situ insertion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in Co3O4 polyhedra as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 9:1592–1599.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn506252u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jing Y, Zhou Z, Cabrera CR, Chen Z (2014) Graphene, inorganic graphene analogs and their composites for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:12104–12122.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta01033g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lv D, Gordin ML, Yi R et al (2014) GeOx/Reduced graphene oxide composite as an anode for li-ion batteries: enhanced capacity via reversible utilization of Li2O along with improved rate performance. Adv Func Mater 24:1059–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201301882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhen M, Guo S, Gao G, Zhou Z, Liu L (2015) TiO2-B nanorods on reduced graphene oxide as anode materials for Li ion batteries. Chem Commun 51:507–510.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc07446g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu S-H, Conte DE, Baek S et al (2013) Structure-properties relationship in iron oxide-reduced graphene oxide nanostructures for li-ion batteries. Adv Func Mater 23:4293–4305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tang J, Yamauchi Y (2016) Carbon Materials MOF morphologies in control. Nat Chem 8:638–639.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guo R, Yue WB, An YM, Ren Y, Yan X (2014) Graphene-encapsulated porous carbon-ZnO composites as high-performance anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 135:161–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen JS, Zhu T, Hu QH et al (2010) Shape-controlled synthesis of cobalt-based nanocubes, nanodiscs, and nanoflowers and their comparative lithium-storage properties. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3628–3635.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am100787w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou Z, Zhang K, Liu J, Peng H, Li G (2015) Comparison study of electrochemical properties of porous zinc oxide/N-doped carbon and pristine zinc oxide polyhedrons. J Power Sour 285:406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chae OB, Park S, Ryu JH, Oh SM (2013) Performance improvement of nano-sized zinc oxide electrode by embedding in carbon matrix for lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 160:A11–A14.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.024301jes CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhou G, Wang D-W, Li F et al (2010) Graphene-wrapped Fe3O4 anode material with improved reversible capacity and cyclic stability for lithium ion batteries. Chem Mater 22:5306–5313.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm101532x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shaju KM, Jiao F, Debart A, Bruce PG (2007) Mesoporous and nanowire Co3O4 as negative electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:1837–1842.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b617519h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang L, Schnepp Z, Titirici MM (2013) Rice husk-derived carbon anodes for lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:5269–5273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xu F, Li Z, Wu L et al (2016) In situ TEM probing of crystallization form-dependent sodiation behavior in ZnO nanowires for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 30:771–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Y, Wang C, Wang Y, Liu H, Huang Z (2016) Superior sodium-ion storage performance of Co3 O4@ nitrogen-doped carbon: derived from a metal–organic framework. J Mater Chem A 4:5428–5435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Klein F, Pinedo R, Berkes BB, Janek J, Adelhelm P (2017) Kinetics and degradation processes of CuO as conversion electrode for sodium-ion batteries: an electrochemical study combined with pressure monitoring and DEMS. J Phys Chem C 121:8679–8691.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied Electrochemistry, Institute of Microelectronic and Solid State ElectronicUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and EngineeringXi’an University of Technology (XAUT)Xi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations