Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 6542–6551 | Cite as

Toughness and crystallization enhancement in wood fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite through controlling matrix nucleation

  • Lang Huang
  • Qiong Wu
  • Shujun Li
  • Rongxian Ou
  • Qingwen Wang
Composites
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

Wood fiber/polypropylene (WF/PP) composites are commonly used to efficiently utilize natural resources and reduce environmental problems, but the low impact toughness has been a major disadvantage of this composite. Most studies are focused on fiber modification or adding coupling agents to overcome this problem, but few of them paid attention to the microstructure of the matrix and its effect on the interface adhesion. Isotactic polypropylene (PP) is polymorphic with different morphological forms: α-, β- and γ-forms. α-PP is predominated form, while β-PP has received considerable attention due to its promising toughness behavior. This study investigated the effect of adding a highly active β-nucleating agent (TMB) for PP on the mechanical and crystallization properties of PP/WF composite. Specifically, the impact strength, the nucleating effect, content of β-crystal, non-isothermal crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of the composite were investigated. Results showed that the content of the β-form crystal of nucleated PP (K value) reached 87% with the addition of 0.3 wt% TMB. Composites with TMB increased the crystallization peak temperature, accelerated the crystallization process and improved its impact strength by 53.12% with the addition of 0.3 wt% TMB nucleating agent, though tensile and flexural properties were dropped by about 10–20%. Also, the spherulite size of nucleated PP in the composite was dramatically decreased.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600459, 31700517), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2017BC100) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622155).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink H-P, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37(11):1552–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marais S, Gouanvé F, Bonnesoeur A, Grenet J, Poncin-Epaillard F, Morvan C, Métayer M (2005) Unsaturated polyester composites reinforced with flax fibers: effect of cold plasma and autoclave treatments on mechanical and permeation properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 36(7):975–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin A, Manolache S, Mattoso L, Rowell R, Denes F (2000) Plasma modification of sisal and high-density polyethylene composites: effect on mechanical properties. In: Proceedings from the third international symposium on natural polymers and composites-ISNaPol, p 431Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu Y, Kawata S, Hosoi K, Kawai T, Kuroda S (2009) Thermomechanical properties of the silanized-kenaf/polystyrene composites. Express Polym Lett 3(10):657–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Effect of chemical modifications of the pineapple leaf fiber surfaces on the interfacial and mechanical properties of laminated biocomposites. Compos Interfaces 15(2–3):169–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hill C, Abdul Khalil H (2000) Effect of fiber treatments on mechanical properties of coir or oil palm fiber reinforced polyester composites. J Appl Polym Sci 78(9):1685–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khalil HA, Ismail H, Rozman H, Ahmad M (2001) The effect of acetylation on interfacial shear strength between plant fibres and various matrices. Eur Polym J 37(5):1037–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keener T, Stuart R, Brown T (2004) Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35(3):357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang L, Mu B, Yi X, Li S, Wang Q (2016) Sustainable use of coffee husks for reinforcing polyethylene composites. J Polym Environ 25(4):1–11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruksakulpiwat Y, Sridee J, Suppakarn N, Sutapun W (2009) Improvement of impact property of natural fiber–polypropylene composite by using natural rubber and EPDM rubber. Compos B Eng 40(7):619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oksman K, Mathew AP, Långström R, Nyström B, Joseph K (2009) The influence of fibre microstructure on fibre breakage and mechanical properties of natural fibre reinforced polypropylene. Compos Sci Technol 69(11):1847–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zuiderduin W, Westzaan C, Huetink J, Gaymans R (2003) Toughening of polypropylene with calcium carbonate particles. Polymer 44(1):261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karger-Kocsis J, Varga J, Ehrenstein G (1997) Comparison of the fracture and failure behavior of injection-molded a- and b-polypropylene in high-speed three-point bending tests. J Appl Polym Sci 64(11):2057–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Foresta T, Piccarolo S, Goldbeck-Wood G (2001) Competition between α and γ phases in isotactic polypropylene: effects of ethylene content and nucleating agents at different cooling rates. Polymer 42(3):1167–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen H, Karger-Kocsis J, Wu J, Varga J (2002) Fracture toughness of α-and β-phase polypropylene homopolymers and random-and block-copolymers. Polymer 43(24):6505–6514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tjong S, Shen J, Li R (1996) Morphological behaviour and instrumented dart impact properties of β-crystalline-phase polypropylene. Polymer 37(12):2309–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grein C (2005) Toughness of neat, rubber modified and filled β-nucleated polypropylene: from fundamentals to applications. In: Kausch H-H (ed) Intrinsic molecular mobility and toughness of polymers II. Springer, Berlin, pp 43–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang Z, Mai K (2010) Crystallization and melting behavior of β-nucleated isotactic polypropylene/polyamide 6 blends with maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene-vinyl acetate as a compatibilizer. Thermochim Acta 511(1):152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dai X, Zhang Z, Wang C, Ding Q, Jiang J, Mai K (2013) A novel montmorillonite with β-nucleating surface for enhancing β-crystallization of isotactic polypropylene. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 49:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao S, Cai Z, Xin Z (2008) A highly active novel β-nucleating agent for isotactic polypropylene. Polymer 49(11):2745–2754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tang J, Wang Y, Liu H, Belfiore LA (2004) Effects of organic nucleating agents and zinc oxide nanoparticles on isotactic polypropylene crystallization. Polymer 45(7):2081–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Naffakh M, Marco C, Ellis G (2012) Novel polypropylene/inorganic fullerene-like WS2 nanocomposites containing a β-nucleating agent: isothermal crystallization and melting behavior. J Phys Chem B 116(6):1788–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang Z, Chen C, Wang C, Junping Z, Mai K (2010) A novel highly efficient β-nucleating agent for polypropylene using nano-CaCO3 as a support. Polym Int 59(9):1199–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meng M-R, Dou Q (2008) Effect of pimelic acid on the crystallization, morphology and mechanical properties of polypropylene/wollastonite composites. Mater Sci Eng A 492(1):177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao KMM, Rao KM, Prasad AR (2010) Fabrication and testing of natural fibre composites: Vakka, sisal, bamboo and banana. Mater Des 31(1):508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jeziorny A (1978) Parameters characterizing the kinetics of the non-isothermal crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) determined by DSC. Polymer 19(10):1142–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones AT, Aizlewood JM, Beckett D (1964) Crystalline forms of isotactic polypropylene. Die Makromolekulare Chemie 75(1):134–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Su Z, Dong M, Guo Z, Yu J (2007) Study of polystyrene and acrylonitrile–styrene copolymer as special β-nucleating agents to induce the crystallization of isotactic polypropylene. Macromolecules 40(12):4217–4224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Varga J, Menyhard A (2007) Effect of solubility and nucleating duality of N,N′-dicyclohexyl-2,6-naphthalenedicarboxamide on the supermolecular structure of isotactic polypropylene. Macromolecules 40(7):2422–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menczel J, Varga J (1983) Influence of nucleating agents on crystallization of polypropylene. J Therm Anal Calorim 28(1):161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jacoby P (2007) Beta nucleating masterbatch offers enhanced properties in polypropylene products. Plast Addit Compd 9(3):32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Varga J (2002) β-modification of isotactic polypropylene: preparation, structure, processing, properties, and application. J Macromol Sci Part B 41(4–6):1121–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials and EnergySouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.College of Chemical EngineeringQingdao University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  3. 3.Composite Materials and Engineering CenterWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology (Ministry of Education)Northeast Forestry UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations