Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 6519–6541 | Cite as

Effect of surface functionalization of halloysite nanotubes on synthesis and thermal properties of poly(ε-caprolactone)

  • Zoi Terzopoulou
  • Dimitrios G. Papageorgiou
  • George Z. Papageorgiou
  • Dimitrios N. Bikiaris
Composites

Abstract

In this work, halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and functionalized HNTs–APTES (aminopropyltriethoxysilane) in concentrations 0.5, 1 and 2.5 wt% were used as nanofillers in the synthesis of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) nanocomposites via the in situ ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone (CL). The successful functionalization of HNTs was confirmed with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The effects of HNTs and HNTs–APTES on the polymerization procedure and on the thermal properties of PCL were studied in detail. It was found that both nanofillers reduced the \( \bar{M} \)n values of the resulting nanocomposites, with the unfunctionalized one reducing it in a higher extent, while SEM micrographs indicated satisfactory dispersion in the PCL matrix. The crystallization study under isothermal and dynamic conditions revealed the nucleating effect of the nanotubes. The functionalization of nanotubes enabled even faster rates and attributed higher nucleation activity as a result of better dispersion and the formation of a strong interface between the filler and the matrix. An in-depth kinetic analysis was performed based on the data from crystallization procedures. PLOM images confirmed the effectiveness of both fillers as heterogeneous nucleation agents. Finally, from TGA analysis, it was found that HNTs did not affect the thermal stability of PCL while for HNTs–APTES, a small decrease in Tmax was observed, of about 5 °C for all filler contents.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Associate Professor Konstantinos Triantafyllidis of the Laboratory of Chemical and Environmental Technology, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, for the nitrogen adsorption/desorption experiments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_1993_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3123 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Liu M, Jia Z, Jia D, Zhou C (2014) Recent advance in research on halloysite nanotubes-polymer nanocomposite. Prog Polym Sci 39:1498–1525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhattacharya M (2016) Polymer nanocomposites-A comparison between carbon nanotubes, graphene, and clay as nanofillers. Materials (Basel) 9:1–35.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9040262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bikiaris D (2011) Can nanoparticles really enhance thermal stability of polymers? Part II: an overview on thermal decomposition of polycondensation polymers. Thermochim Acta 523:25–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chrissafis K, Bikiaris D (2011) Can nanoparticles really enhance thermal stability of polymers? Part I: an overview on thermal decomposition of addition polymers. Thermochim Acta 523:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papageorgiou GZ, Achilias DS, Bikiaris DN, Karayannidis GP (2005) Crystallization kinetics and nucleation activity of filler in polypropylene/surface-treated SiO2 nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 427:117–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2004.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papageorgiou GZ, Karandrea E, Giliopoulos D et al (2014) Effect of clay structure and type of organomodifier on the thermal properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) based nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 576:84–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2013.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papageorgiou GZ, Terzopoulou Z, Achilias DS et al (2013) Biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) nanocomposites. Effect of filler type on thermal behaviour and crystallization kinetics. Polymer (United Kingdom) 54:4604–4616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.005 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papageorgiou GZ, Terzopoulou Z, Bikiaris D et al (2014) Evaluation of the formed interface in biodegradable poly(l-lactic acid)/graphene oxide nanocomposites and the effect of nanofillers on mechanical and thermal properties. Thermochim Acta 597:48–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2014.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Terzopoulou Z, Patsiaoura D, Papageorgiou DG et al (2017) Effect of MWCNTs and their modification on crystallization and thermal degradation of poly(butylene naphthalate). Thermochim Acta 656:59–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sengupta R, Bhattacharya M, Bandyopadhyay S, Bhowmick AK (2011) A review on the mechanical and electrical properties of graphite and modified graphite reinforced polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 36:638–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leslie-Pelecky DL, Rieke RD (1996) Magnetic properties of nanostructured materials. Chem Mater 8:1770–1783.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm960077f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanchez C, Lebeau B, Chaput F, Boilot J-P (2003) Optical properties of functional hybrid organic-inorganic nanocomposites. Adv Mater 15:1969–1994.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200300389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Armentano I, Dottori M, Fortunati E et al (2010) Biodegradable polymer matrix nanocomposites for tissue engineering: a review. Polym Degrad Stab 95:2126–2146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kloprogge JT (1998) Synthesis of smectites and porous pillared clay catalysts: a review. J Porous Mater 5:5–41.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009625913781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murray HH (1991) Overview—clay mineral applications. Appl Clay Sci 5:379–395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(91)90014-Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joussein E, Petit S, Churchman J et al (2005) Halloysite clay minerals—a review. Clay Miner 40:383–426.  https://doi.org/10.1180/0009855054040180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lvov YM, DeVilliers MM, Fakhrullin RF (2016) The application of halloysite tubule nanoclay in drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 5247:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2016.1169271 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Du M, Guo B, Jia D (2010) Newly emerging applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Polym Int 59:574–582.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2754 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peixoto AF, Fernandes AC, Pereira C et al (2016) Physicochemical characterization of organosilylated halloysite clay nanotubes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 219:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Labet M, Thielemans W (2009) Synthesis of polycaprolactone: a review. Chem Soc Rev 38:3484.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b820162p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mondal D, Griffith M, Venkatraman SS (2016) Polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering and drug delivery: current scenario and challenges. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 65:255–265.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2015.1103241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marco Zanetti, Sergei L, Giovanni Camino (2000) Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 279:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1439-2054(20000601)279:1%3C1::AID-MAME1%3E3.0.CO;2-Q/full CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuo SW, Huang WJ, Huang SB et al (2003) Syntheses and characterizations of in situ blended metallocence polyethylene/clay nanocomposites. Polymer (Guildf) 44:7709–7719.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim J, Kwak S, Hong SM et al (2010) Nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization of high-density polyethylene on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Macromolecules 43:10545–10553.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma102036h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zou H, Wu S, Shen J (2008) Polymer/silica nanocomposites: preparation, characterization, properties, and applications. Chem Rev 108:3893–3957.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068035q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vikas M (ed) (2011) In-situ synthesis of polymer nanocomposites. In: In-situ synthesis of polymer nanocomposites. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lahcini M, Elhakioui S, Szopinski D et al (2016) Harnessing synergies in tin-clay catalyst for the preparation of poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/halloysite nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 81:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhagabati P, Chaki TK, Khastgir D (2015) One-step in situ modification of halloysite nanotubes: augmentation in polymer-filler interface adhesion in nanocomposites. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:6698–6712.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vieira Marques MDF, da Silva Rosa JL, da Silva MCV (2017) Nanocomposites of polypropylene with halloysite nanotubes employing in situ polymerization. Polym Bull 74:2447–2464.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-016-1848-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhao M, Liu P (2008) Halloysite nanotubes/polystyrene (HNTs/PS) nanocomposites via in situ bulk polymerization. J Therm Anal Calorim 94:103–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8677-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lin Y, Ng KM, Chan C-M et al (2011) High-impact polystyrene/halloysite nanocomposites prepared by emulsion polymerization using sodium dodecyl sulfate as surfactant. J Colloid Interface Sci 358:423–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barkoula NM, Alcock B, Cabrera NO, Peijs T (2008) Fatigue properties of highly oriented polypropylene tapes and all-polypropylene composites. Polym Polym Compos 16:101–113Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Marini J, Pollet E, Averous L, Bretas RES (2014) Elaboration and properties of novel biobased nanocomposites with halloysite nanotubes and thermoplastic polyurethane from dimerized fatty acids. Polymer (Guildf) 55:5226–5234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gong B, Ouyang C, Gao Q et al (2016) Synthesis and properties of a millable polyurethane nanocomposite based on castor oil and halloysite nanotubes. RSC Adv 6:12084–12092.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA21586B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Haroosh HJ, Dong Y, Chaudhary DS et al (2013) Electrospun PLA: pCL composites embedded with unmodified and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (ASP) modified halloysite nanotubes (HNT). Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 110:433–442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-012-7233-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Du M, Guo B, Liu M, Jia D (2006) Preparation and characterization of polypropylene grafted halloysite and their compatibility effect to polypropylene/halloysite composite. Polym J 38:1198–1204.  https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.PJ2006038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Albdiry MT, Yousif BF (2013) Morphological structures and tribological performance of unsaturated polyester based untreated/silane-treated halloysite nanotubes. Mater Des 48:68–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen S, Lu X, Wang T, Zhang Z (2015) Preparation and characterization of mechanically and thermally enhanced polyimide/reactive halloysite nanotubes nanocomposites. J Polym Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-015-0806-3 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roumeli E, Papageorgiou DG, Tsanaktsis V et al (2015) Amino-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes lead to successful ring-opening polymerization of poLY(ε-caprolactone): enhanced interfacial bonding and optimized mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:11683–11694.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b03693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shi Y-F, Tian Z, Zhang Y et al (2011) Functionalized halloysite nanotube-based carrier for intracellular delivery of antisense oligonucleotides. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:608.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-6-608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roumeli E, Avgeropoulos A, Pavlidou E et al (2014) Understanding the mechanical and thermal property reinforcement of crosslinked polyethylene by nanodiamonds and carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv 4:45522–45534.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra05585c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roumeli E, Pavlidou E, Avgeropoulos A et al (2014) Factors controlling the enhanced mechanical and thermal properties of nanodiamond-reinforced cross-linked high density polyethylene. J Phys Chem B.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp504531f Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vassiliou AA, Papageorgiou GZ, Achilias DS, Bikiaris DN (2007) Non-isothermal crystallisation kinetics of in situ prepared poly(ε-caprolactone)/surface-treated SiO2 nanocomposites. Macromol Chem Phys 208:364–376.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200600447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Michell RM, Mugica A, Zubitur M, Müller AJ (2017) Self-nucleation of crystalline phases within homopolymers, polymer blends, copolymers, and nanocomposites. In: Auriemma F, Alfonso GC, de Rosa C (eds) Polymer crystallization I: from chain microstructure to processing. Springer, Cham, pp 215–256Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Arnal ML, Balsamo V, Ronca G et al (2000) Applications of successive self-nucleation and annealing (SSA) to polymer characterization. J Therm Anal Calorim 59:451–470.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010137408023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Muller AJ, Albuerne J, Marquez L et al (2005) Self-nucleation and crystallization kinetics of double crystalline poly(p-dioxanone)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) diblock copolymers. Faraday Discuss 128:231–252.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B403085K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yuan P, Southon PD, Liu Z et al (2008) Functionalization of halloysite clay nanotubes by grafting with γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. J Phys Chem C 112:15742–15751.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp805657t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ng KM, Lau YTR, Chan CM et al (2011) Surface studies of halloysite nanotubes by XPS and ToF-SIMS. Surf Interface Anal 43:795–802.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.3627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hillier S, Brydson RIK, Delbos E et al (2016) Correlations among the mineralogical and physical properties of halloysite nanotubes (HNTs). Clay Miner 51:1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hu P, Yang H (2013) Insight into the physicochemical aspects of kaolins with different morphologies. Appl Clay Sci 74:58–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2012.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Luo P, Zhang J, Zhang B et al (2011) Preparation and characterization of silane coupling agent modified halloysite for Cr(VI) removal. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:10246–10252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kricheldorf HR, Berl M, Scharnagl N (1988) Poly(lactones). 9. Polymerization Mechanism of metal alkoxide initiated polymerizations of lactide and various lactones. Macromolecules 21:286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 90:75–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Navarro-Baena I, Marcos-Fernandez A, Kenny JM, Peponi L (2014) Crystallization behavior of diblock copolymers based on PCL and PLLA biopolymers. J Appl Crystallogr 47:1948–1957.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714022468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Abdelrazek EM, Hezma AM, El-khodary A, Elzayat AM (2016) Spectroscopic studies and thermal properties of PCL/PMMA biopolymer blend. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 3:10–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbas.2015.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gloria A, Russo T, D’Amora U et al (2013) Magnetic poly(ε-caprolactone)/iron-doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite substrates for advanced bone tissue engineering. J R Soc Interface 10:20120833.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rezaei A, Mohammadi MR (2013) In vitro study of hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone (HA/PCL) nanocomposite synthesized by an in situ sol–gel process. Mater Sci Eng C 33:390–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fabbri P, Bondioli F, Messori M et al (2010) Porous scaffolds of polycaprolactone reinforced with in situ generated hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:343–351.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3839-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rooj S, Das A, Thakur V et al (2010) Preparation and properties of natural nanocomposites based on natural rubber and naturally occurring halloysite nanotubes. Mater Des 31:2151–2156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tham WL, Poh BT, Mohd Ishak ZA, Chow WS (2014) Thermal behaviors and mechanical properties of halloysite nanotube-reinforced poly(lactic acid) nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim 118:1639–1647.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4062-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lee K-S, Chang Y-W (2013) Thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of poly(ε-caprolactone)/halloysite nanotube nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 128:2807–2816.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Di Lorenzo ML, Silvestre C (1999) Non-isothermal crystallization of polymers. Prog Polym Sci 24:917–950.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(99)00019-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nerantzaki M, Papageorgiou GZ, Bikiaris DN (2014) Effect of nanofiller’s type on the thermal properties and enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone). Polym Degrad Stab 108:257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Guan W, Qiu Z (2012) Isothermal crystallization kinetics, morphology, and dynamic mechanical properties of biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone) and octavinyl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes nanocomposites. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:3203–3208.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202802d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pan H, Yu J, Qiu Z (2011) Crystallization and morphology studies of biodegradable poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 51:2159–2165.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Qiu Z, Wang H, Xu C (2011) Crystallization, mechanical properties, and controlled enzymatic degradation of biodegradable poly(ε-caprolactone)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11:7884–7893.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Avrami M (1941) Granulation, phase change, and microstructure kinetics of phase change III. J Chem Phys 9:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Avrami M (1940) Kinetics of phase change. II transformation-time relations for random distribution of nuclei. J Chem Phys 8:212–224.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Avrami M (1939) Kinetics of phase change. I general theory. J Chem Phys 7:1103–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lorenzo AT, Arnal ML, Albuerne J, Müller AJ (2007) DSC isothermal polymer crystallization kinetics measurements and the use of the Avrami equation to fit the data: guidelines to avoid common problems. Polym Test 26:222–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hoffman JD, Miller RL (1997) Kinetic of crystallization from the melt and chain folding in polyethylene fractions revisited: theory and experiment. Polymer (Guildf) 38:3151–3212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00071-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Papageorgiou DG, Papageorgiou GZ, Bikiaris DN, Chrissafis K (2013) Crystallization and melting of propylene–ethylene random copolymers. Homogeneous nucleation and β-nucleating agents. Eur Polym J 49:1577–1590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nanaki SG, Papageorgiou GZ, Bikiaris DN (2012) Crystallization of novel poly(ε-caprolactone)-block-poly(propylene adipate) copolymers. J Therm Anal Calorim 108:633–645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-2155-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lopez JV, Perez-Camargo RA, Zhang B et al (2016) The influence of small amounts of linear polycaprolactone chains on the crystallization of cyclic analogue molecules. RSC Adv 6:48049–48063.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA04823D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Di Maio E, Iannace S, Sorrentino L, Nicolais L (2004) Isothermal crystallization in PCL/clay nanocomposites investigated with thermal and rheometric methods. Polymer (Guildf) 45:8893–8900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.10.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Siqueira G, Fraschini C, Bras J et al (2011) Impact of the nature and shape of cellulosic nanoparticles on the isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ε-caprolactone). Eur Polym J 47:2216–2227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhuravlev E, Schmelzer JWP, Wunderlich B, Schick C (2011) Kinetics of nucleation and crystallization in poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL). Polymer (Guildf) 52:1983–1997.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Di Y, Iannace S, Di Maio E, Nicolais L (2003) Nanocomposites by melt intercalation based on polycaprolactone and organoclay. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 41:670–678.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.10420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Dobreva A, Gutzow I (1993) Activity of substrates in the catalyzed nucleation of glass-forming melts. I. Theory. J Non Cryst Solids 162:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(93)90736-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Dobreva A, Gutzow I (1993) Activity of substrates in the catalyzed nucleation of glass-forming melts. II. Experimental evidence. J Non Cryst Solids 162:13–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(93)90737-I CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vyazovkin S, Dranca I (2006) Isoconversional analysis of combined melt and glass crystallization data. Macromol Chem Phys 207:20–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200500419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM et al (2011) ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta 520:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.03.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Friedman HL (1964) Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. J Polym Sci Part C Polym Symp 6:183–195.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070060121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Vyazovkin S, Sbirrazzuoli N (2002) Isoconversional analysis of the nonisothermal crystallization of a polymer melt. Macromol Rapid Commun 23:766–770.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3927(20020901)23:13<766::AID-MARC766>3.0.CO;2-0/abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bosq N, Guigo N, Zhuravlev E, Sbirrazzuoli N (2013) Nonisothermal crystallization of polytetrafluoroethylene in a wide range of cooling rates. J Phys Chem B 117:3407–3415.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp311196g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Vyazovkin S, Sbirrazzuoli N (2003) Estimating the activation energy for non-isothermal crystallization of polymer melts. J Therm Anal Calorim 72:681–686.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024506522878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Papageorgiou DG, Chrissafis K, Pavlidou E et al (2014) Effect of nanofiller’s size and shape on the solid state microstructure and thermal properties of poly(butylene succinate) nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 590:181–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2014.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Vyazovkin S, Sbirrazzuoli N (2004) Isoconversional approach to evaluating the Hoffman–Lauritzen parameters (U* and Kg) from the overall rates of nonisothermal crystallization. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:733–738.  https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200300295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Dong Y, Marshall J, Haroosh HJ et al (2015) Polylactic acid (PLA)/halloysite nanotube (HNT) composite mats: influence of HNT content and modification. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 76:28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Cervantes-Uc JM, Cauich-Rodríguez JV, Vázquez-Torres H et al (2007) Thermal degradation of commercially available organoclays studied by TGA–FTIR. Thermochim Acta 457:92–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2007.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Papageorgiou DG, Roumeli E, Terzopoulou Z et al (2015) Polycaprolactone/multi-wall carbon nanotube nanocomposites prepared by in situ ring opening polymerization: decomposition profiling using thermogravimetric analysis and analytical pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.07.007 Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Nitya G, Nair GT, Mony U et al (2012) In vitro evaluation of electrospun PCL/nanoclay composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:1749–1761.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4647-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Torres E, Fombuena V, Vallés-Lluch A, Ellingham T (2017) Improvement of mechanical and biological properties of polycaprolactone loaded with hydroxyapatite and halloysite nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng C 75:418–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Jing X, Mi HY, Turng LS (2017) Comparison between PCL/hydroxyapatite (HA) and PCL/halloysite nanotube (HNT) composite scaffolds prepared by co-extrusion and gas foaming. Mater Sci Eng C 72:53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Technology, Department of ChemistryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.School of Materials and National Graphene InstituteUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations