Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 53, Issue 9, pp 6774–6784 | Cite as

Metal–organic-framework-derived Co/nitrogen-doped porous carbon composite as an effective oxygen reduction electrocatalyst

Energy materials
  • 81 Downloads

Abstract

A Co-metal–organic-framework (MOF) crystal has been hydrothermally synthesized. Then the corresponding Co/nitrogen-doped porous carbon (Co/NPC) composite is fabricated by direct pyrolyzation of MOF without any precursor additive. The results reveal that the MOF-derived Co/NPC exhibits a porous structure with a surface area of 412 m2 g−1 and a narrow pore size distribution (from 1.8 to 4.9 nm). The doped N mainly occurs in pyridine N and graphitic N types with total content as 4.11 at.%, which is originated from the N-based ligands in MOF. As an efficient oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalyst, Co/NPC shows a more positive onset potential (0.91 V vs. RHE) with a diffusion-limited current density of 5.46 mA cm−2 at 0.3 V (vs. RHE). The rotating disk electrode and rotating ring-disk electrode results suggest that the Co/NPC catalyst experiences a nearly 4e pathway with a stronger methanol tolerance and better durability than commercial Pt/C catalyst in 0.1 M KOH. The excellent ORR catalytic activity of Co/NPC can be attributed to the N-doped porous carbon structure with incorporated metallic Co active species. This work affords a new strategy for preparation of non-noble metal ORR catalysts employing MOF as a precursor.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2017GGX20143), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2014JL013), Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21173135, 21405088, 21573133 and 21575073), the Foundation of Key Laboratory of Sensor Analysis of Tumor Marker, Ministry of Education, Qingdao University of Science and Technology (SATM201603), the open foundation from the Key Lab of Marine Bioactive Substance and Modern Analysis Technology, SOA (MBSMAT-2017-02, MBSMAT-2016-02 and MBSMAT-2015-04).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10853_2018_1989_MOESM1_ESM.docx (133 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 133 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao S, Yin H, Du L, He L, Zhao K, Chang L et al (2014) Carbonized nanoscale metal–organic frameworks as high performance electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 8:12660–12668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Z, Sun H, Wei L, Jiang W, Wu M, Hu J (2017) Lamellar metal organic framework derived Fe–N–C non-noble electrocatalysts with bimodal porosity for efficient oxygen reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5272–5278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walter MG, Warren EL, McKone JR, Boettcher SW, Mi QX, Santori EA et al (2010) Solar water splitting cells. Chem Rev 110:6446–6473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang H, Dai H (2013) Strongly coupled inorganic-nano-carbon hybrid materials for energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 42:3088–3113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greeley J, Stephens IE, Bondarenko AS, Johansson TP, Hansen HA, Jaramillo TF et al (2009) Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat Chem 1:552–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang HW, Cao X, Zhou F, Cui CH, Zhang WJ, Yu SH (2011) A free-standing Pt-nanowire membrane as a highly stable electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Adv Mater 23:1467–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou L, Zhang C, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X (2016) Directed growth of metal–organic frameworks and their derived carbon-based network for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Adv Mater 28:2337–2344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang E, Gu W, Hu L, Hong W, Jia X, Li J (2016) Noble-metal-free Co3S4-S/G porous hybrids as an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem Sci 7:4167–4173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jian Z, Liu P, Li F, He P, Guo X, Chen M et al (2014) Core-shell-structured CNT@RuO2 composite as a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable LiO2 batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma M, You S, Gong X, Dai Y, Zou J, Fu H (2015) Silver/iron oxide/graphitic carbon composites as bacteriostatic catalysts for enhancing oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 283:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ma TY, Dai S, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ (2014) Metal–organic framework derived hybrid Co3O4-carbon porous nanowire arrays as reversible oxygen evolution electrodes. J Am Chem Soc 136:13925–13931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhan T, Liu X, Lu SS, Hou W (2017) Nitrogen doped NiFe layered double hydroxide/reduced graphene oxide mesoporous nanosphere as an effective bifunctional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. Appl Catal B Environ 205:551–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang C, Antonietti M, Fellinger TP (2014) Blood ties: Co3O4 decorated blood derived carbon as a superior bifunctional electrocatalyst. Adv Funct Mater 24:7655–7665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu ZY, Chen P, Wu QS, Yang LF, Pan Z, Wang Q (2014) Co/Co3O4/C–N, a novel nanostructure and excellent catalytic system for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy 8:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang J, Wu H, Gao D, Miao S, Wang G, Bao X (2015) High-density iron nanoparticles encapsulated within nitrogen-doped carbon nanoshell as efficient oxygen electrocatalyst for zinc–air battery. Nano Energy 13:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu HS, Zhang H, Liu R, Zhang X, Zhao H, Wang G (2017) Macroscale cobalt-MOFs derived metallic Co nanoparticles embedded in N-doped porous carbon layers as efficient oxygen electrocatalysts. Appl Surf Sci 392:402–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang X, Liu S, Zang Y, Liu R, Liu G, Wang G et al (2016) Co/Co9S8 @S, N-doped porous graphene sheets derived from S, N dual organic ligands assembled Co-MOFs as superior electrocatalysts for full water splitting in alkaline media. Nano Energy 30:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aijaz A, Masa J, Rösler C, Xia W, Weide P, Botz AJR et al (2016) Co@Co3O4 encapsulated in carbon nanotube-grafted nitrogen-doped carbon polyhedra as an advanced bifunctional oxygen electrode. Angew Chem Int Ed 55:4087–4091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Han J, Sa YJ, Shim Y, Choi M, Park N, Joo SH et al (2015) Coordination chemistry of [Co(acac)2] with N-doped graphene: implications for oxygen reduction reaction reactivity of organometallic CoO4N species. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:12622–12626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun T, Xu L, Li S, Chai W, Huang Y, Yan Y et al (2016) Cobalt–nitrogen-doped ordered macro-/mesoporous carbon for highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Appl Catal B Environ 193:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niu KX, Yang BP, Cui JF, Jin JT, Fu XG, Zhao QP et al (2013) Graphene-based non-noble-metal Co/N/C catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution. J Power Sources 243:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lan YQ, Liu CH, Tang YJ, Wang XL, Huang W, Li SL et al (2016) Highly active Co–Mo–C/NRGO composite as efficient oxygen electrode for water–oxygen redox cycle. J Mater Chem A 4:418100–418106Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Furukawa H, Cordova KE, Keeffe MO, Yaghi OM (2013) The chemistry andapplications of metal–organic frameworks. Science 341:1230444–1230456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou HC, Long JR, Yaghi OM (2012) Introduction to metal–organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112:673–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li JR (2009) Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 38:1477–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cadiau A, Adil K, Bhatt PM, Belmabkhout Y, Eddaoudi M (2016) A metal–organic framework-based splitter for separating propylene from propane. Science 353:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Horcajada P, Chalati T, Serre C, Gillet B, Sebrie C, Baati T et al (2014) Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat Mater 9:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gao J, Miao J, Li J, Teng WY, Yang L, Zhao Y et al (2014) Ap-type Ti(IV)-based metal–organic framework with visible-light photo-response. Chem Commun 50:3786–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tanabe KK, Cohen SM (2011) Postsynthetic modification of metal–organic frameworks—a progress report. Chem Soc Rev 40:498–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun H, Su H, Ma X, Zhang P, Zhang X, Dai X et al (2016) Fe/IRMOF-3 derived porous carbons as non-precious metal electrocatalysts with high activity and stability towards oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim Acta 205:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xia BY, Yan Y, Li N, Wu HB, Lou XW, Wang X (2016) A metal–organic framework-derived bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst. Nat Energy 1:15006–15009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu H, Fisher A, Cheng D, Cao D (2016) Cu, N-codoped hierarchical porous carbons as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 8:21431–21439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wen YH, Xu GF, Yao K, Dou RT, Guo JX (2014) Syntheses, characterization, and electrochemical lithium-ion storage properties of two cobalt coordination polymers containing 5-hydroxyisophthalic acid and bis-benzoimidazole ligands. Z Anorg Allg Chem 640:2091–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ramírez A, Hillebrand P, Stellmach D, May MM, Bogdanoff P, Fiechter S (2014) Evaluation of MnOx, Mn2O3, and Mn3O4 electrodeposited films for the oxygen evolution reaction of water. J Phys Chem C 118:14073–14081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu T, Guo YF, Yan YM, Wang F, Deng C, Rooney D et al (2016) CoO nanoparticles embedded in three-dimensional nitrogen/sulfur co-doped carbon nanofiber networks as a bifunctional catalyst for oxygen reduction/evolution reactions. Carbon 106:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bian W, Yang Z, Strasser P, Yang R (2014) A CoFe2O4/graphene nanohybrid as an efficient bi-functional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution. J Power Sources 250:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang LJ, Wang XY, Wang RH, Hong MC (2015) Structural evolution from metal–organic framework to hybrids of nitrogen-doped porous carbon and carbon nanotubes for enhanced oxygen reduction activity. Chem Mater 27:7610–7618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Li R, Dai Y, Chen B, Zou J, Jiang BJ, Fu H (2016) Nitrogen-doped Co/Co9S8/partly-graphitized carbon as durable catalysts for oxygen reduction in microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 307:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hao GP, Lu AH, Dong W, Jin ZY, Zhang XQ, Zhang JT et al (2013) Sandwich-type microporous carbon nanosheets for enhanced supercapacitor performance. Adv Energy Mater 3:1421–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Men B, Sun Y, Li M, Hu C, Zhang M, Wang L et al (2016) Hierarchical metal-free nitrogen-doped porous graphene/carbon composites as an efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalyst. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1415–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang L, Su Z, Jiang F, Yang L, Qian J, Zhou Y et al (2014) Highly graphitized nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanopolyhedra derived from ZIF-8 nanocrystals as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reactions. Nanoscale 6:6590–6602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lu J, Zhou WJ, Wang LK, Jia J, Ke Y, Yang LJ et al (2016) Core–shell nanocomposites based on gold nanoparticle@Zinc–Iron-embedded porous carbons derived from metal–organic frameworks as efficient dual catalysts for oxygen reduction and hydrogen evolution reactions. ACS Catal 6:1045–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xia W, Mahmood J, Zou R, Xu Q (2015) Metal–organic frameworks and their derived nanostructures for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ Sci 8:1837–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wu G, Zelenay P (2013) Nanostructured nonprecious metal catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Acc Chem Res 46:1878–1889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gu WL, Hu LY, Li J, Wang EK (2016) Hybrid of g-C3N4 assisted metal–organic frameworks and their derived high-efficiency oxygen reduction electrocatalyst in the whole pH range. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:35281–35288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tao L, Wang Q, Dou S, Ma Z, Huo J, Wang S et al (2016) Edge-rich and dopant-free graphene as a highly efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Environ Sci 52:2764–2767Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Olson TS, Pylypenko S, Atanassov P, Asazawa K, Yamada K, Tanaka H (2010) Anion-exchange membrane fuel cells: dual-site mechanism of oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media on cobalt–polypyrrole electrocatalysts. J Phys Chem C 114:5049–5059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu J, Sun X, Song P, Zhang Y, Xing W, Xu W (2013) High-performance oxygen reduction electrocatalysts based on cheap carbon black, nitrogen, and trace iron. Adv Mater 25:6879–6883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Aravind SJ, Jafri RI, Rajalakshmi N, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Solar exfoliated graphene–carbon nanotube hybrid nano composites as efficient catalyst supports for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Mater Chem 21:18199–18204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Zhou J, Wang J, Regier T et al (2011) Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat Mater 10:780–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hu H, Han L, Yu MZ, Wang ZY, Lou XW (2016) Metal–organic-framework-engaged formation of Co nanoparticle-embedded carbon@Co9S8 double-shelled nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction. Energy Environ Sci 9:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Sensor Analysis of Tumor Marker (Ministry of Education), State Key Laboratory Base of Eco-chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular EngineeringQingdao University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Department of Applied Chemistry, College of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations