Modeling the thermodynamic behavior and shock response of Ti systems at the atomic scales and the mesoscales
- 527 Downloads
The ‘quasi-coarse-grained dynamics’ (QCGD) method is extended to model the thermodynamic behavior and the shock response of HCP Ti systems at the mesoscales by coarse-graining the atomistic microstructure using representative atoms (R-atoms) and scaled interatomic potentials. To demonstrate the capability of the QCGD method, the melting behavior of a single-crystal slab of HCP Ti and the dynamic failure (spallation) behavior of nanocrystalline systems under shock loading conditions are first investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using an embedded atom method interatomic potential for Ti. The melting simulation suggests an interplay between the nucleation and propagation of the surface-induced heterogeneous melting and the nucleation and propagation of bulk homogeneous melting of the system. In addition, the spall strengths calculated using MD at strain rates of 1010 s−1 allow the development of improved models for the strain rate dependence of the spall strength determined experimentally at 105 s−1. The QCGD method is observed to be capable of reproducing the MD-predicted kinetics of melting and the shock response and spall failure of nanocrystalline Ti systems using a coarse-grained microstructure comprising of representative atoms (R-atoms). The QCGD simulations demonstrate the ability to model the mesoscale behavior of Ti systems by modeling the shock deformation and failure due to spallation of a 1 µm × 1 µm × 2 µm sized system at strain rates of 108 s−1 to bridge the gap between MD simulations and experiments.
This material is based upon work supported by the US Army Research Office under Contract/Grant Number W911NF-14-1-0257. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Army Research Office or of the US Government.
- 5.National Research Council (2011) Opportunities in protection materials science and technology for future army applications. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 20.Remington BA, Bazan G, Belak J, Bringa E, Caturla M, Colvin JD, Edwards MJ, Glendinning SG, Ivanov DS, Kad B, Kalantar DH, Kumar M, Lasinski BF, Lorenz KT, McNaney JM, Meyerhofer DD, Meyers MA, Pollaine SM, Rowley D, Schneider M, Stölken JS, Wark JS, Weber SV, Wolfer WG, Yaakobi B, Zhigilei LV (2004) Materials science under extreme conditions of pressure and strain rate. Metall Mater Trans A 35:2587–2607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kanel GI, Razorenov SV, Fortov VE (1987) Spall resistance of metals over a wide range of shock load amplitudes. Acad Sci USSR-Dokl 294:350Google Scholar
- 25.Sedao X, Shugaev MV, Wu C, Douillard T, Esnouf C, Maurice C, Reynaud S, Pigeon F, Garrelie F, Zhigilei LV, Colombier J-P (2016) Growth twinning and generation of high-frequency surface nanostructures in ultrafast laser-induced transient melting and resolidification. ACS Nano 10:6995–7007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Mackenchery K, Dongare AM (2015) Shock Hugoniot Behavior of single crystal titanium using atomistic simulations. In: Proceedings of 2015 shock compression of condensed matter (accepted, in press)Google Scholar
- 40.Chase MW (1998) NIST-JANAF thermochemical tables. American Institute of Physics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 41.Marsh SP (1980) LASL Shock Hugoniot data. University of California Press, Berkeley, p 143Google Scholar