Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 52, Issue 8, pp 4288–4298

Mesostructure optimization in multi-material additive manufacturing: a theoretical perspective

Original Paper

Abstract

As multi-material additive manufacturing technologies mature, a new opportunity for materials science and engineering emerges between the scale of the microstructure and the scale of an engineering component. Here we explore the problem of “mesostructure optimization,” the computational identification of preferred point-to-point distributions of material structure and properties. We illustrate the opportunity with two simple example problems for 1D and 2D mesostructure optimization, respectively, namely (1) a functionally graded cylinder that is computationally optimized to redistribute the Hertzian contact stress fields and (2) a thin plate made of digital materials computationally designed to simultaneously maximize bending resistance and minimize total weight. The mechanical performance of materials in these two problems is significantly improved as compared to any monolithic-material counterpart, including a topology-optimized monolith in case (2). These results point to new opportunities for multi-objective performance enhancement in materials.

References

  1. 1.
    Bourell DL, Leu MC, Rosen DW (2009) Roadmap for additive manufacturing: identifying the future of freeform processing. The University of Texas, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gebhardt A (2012) Understanding additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping, rapid tooling, rapid manufacturing. Hanser Publications, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies, SpringerLink (Online service). Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hopkinson N, Hague RJM, Dickens PM (2006) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3D printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26:5930–5935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer J, Hengsbach S, Tesari I, Schwaiger R, Kraft O (2014) High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:2453–2458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smay JE, Gratson GM, Shepherd RF, Cesarano J, Lewis JA (2002) Directed colloidal assembly of 3D periodic structures. Adv Mater 14:1279–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hofmann DC, Roberts S, Otis R, Kolodziejska J, Dillon RP, Suh JO, Shapiro AA, Liu ZK, Borgonia JP (2014) Developing gradient metal alloys through radial deposition additive manufacturing. Sci Rep 4:5357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banerjee R, Collins PC, Bhattacharyya D, Banerjee S, Fraser HL (2003) Microstructural evolution in laser deposited compositionally graded α/β titanium-vanadium alloys. Acta Mater 51:3277–3292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oxman N, Keating S, Tsai E (2011) Functionally graded rapid prototyping, innovative developments in virtual and physical prototyping. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on advanced research in virtual and rapid prototyping, CRC Press, Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology, optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rozvany GIN (1997) Topology optimization in structural mechanics. Springer, WienCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA (2001) Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3443–3459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bureerat S, Limtragool J (2006) Performance enhancement of evolutionary search for structural topology optimisation. Finite Elem Anal Des 42:547–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lamberti L (2008) An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for design optimization of truss structures. Comput Struct 86:1936–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moita JMS, Correia VMF, Martins PG, Soares CMM, Soares CAM (2006) Optimal design in vibration control of adaptive structures using a simulated annealing algorithm. Compos Struct 75:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sigmund O (1997) On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mech Struct Mach 25:493–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suzuki K, Kikuchi N (1991) A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 93:291–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rozvany GIN (2009) A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37:217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adams BL, Kalidindi S, Fullwood DT (2013) Microstructure sensitive design for performance optimization. Butterworth-Heinemann, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torquato S (2010) Optimal design of heterogeneous materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 40:101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Torquato S (2002) Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson OK, Schuh CA (2013) The uncorrelated triple junction distribution function: towards grain boundary network design. Acta Mater 61:2863–2873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cross SR, Woollam R, Shademan S, Schuh CA (2013) Computational design and optimization of multilayered and functionally graded corrosion coatings. Corros Sci 77:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suresh S, Mortensen A (1998) Fundamentals of functionally graded materials: processing and thermomechanical behaviour of graded metals and metal–ceramic composites. IOM Communications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mortensen A, Suresh S (1995) Functionally graded metals and metal–ceramic composites: part 1 processing. Int Mater Rev 40:239–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suresh S, Mortensen A (1997) Functionally graded metals and metal–ceramic composites: part 2 thermomechanical behaviour. Int Mater Rev 42:85–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ashby MF (2005) Materials selection in mechanical design, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yang X-S (2014) Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seidel R et al (2016) Ultrastructural and developmental features of the tessellated endoskeleton of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). J Anat 229:681–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gibson LJ (2012) The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials. J R Soc Interface 9:2749–2766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dixon PG, Gibson LJ (2014) The structure and mechanics of Moso bamboo material. J R Soc Interface 11:20140321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Balla VK et al (2007) Compositionally graded yttria-stabilized zirconia coating on stainless steel using laser engineered net shaping (LENS). Scripta Mater 57:861–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Balla VK et al (2009) Fabrication of compositionally and structurally graded Ti–TiO2 structures using laser engineered net shaping (LENS). Acta Biomater 5:1831–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilson J, Shin YC (2012) Microstructure and wear properties of laser-deposited functionally graded Inconel 690 reinforced with TiC. Surf Coat Technol 207:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vaezi M et al (2013) Multiple material additive manufacturing—part 1: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp 8:19–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tammas-Williams S, Todd I (2016) Design for additive manufacturing with site-specific properties in metals and alloys. Scripta Materialia. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.030
  39. 39.
    Liu W, DuPont JN (2003) Fabrication of functionally graded TiC/Ti composites by laser engineered net shaping. Scripta Mater 48:1337–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
    Doubrovski EL et al (2015) Voxel-based fabrication through material property mapping: a design method for bitmap printing. Comput Aided Des 60:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Suresh S (2001) Graded materials for resistance to contact deformation and damage. Science 292:2447–2451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sigmund O (2001) Design of multiphysics actuators using topology optimization—part I: one-material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:6577–6604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.Xtalic CorporationMarlboroughUSA

Personalised recommendations