Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part II: application on real samples
- 369 Downloads
Preservation of documentary heritage is one of the biggest challenges facing paper conservators today. The singular properties of bacterial cellulose (BC) lead us to propose to reinforce paper with BC sheets. In the first part of this study, the reinforcing capability of BC was tested on model papers of well-known fiber composition. The aim of the present study was to verify the suitability of rebuilding degraded old papers with BC. The degraded papers were characterized before and after the reinforcement. In addition, lined samples were characterized before and after an aging process in order to study the stability in time. The same methodology was used with Japanese paper (JP), a material commonly used by paper conservators, in order to compare both materials as reinforcement. Mechanical properties of paper lined with BC are as good as those obtained with JP. Papers lined with BC have more marked modifications on their optical properties than those restored with JP. Nevertheless, letters in books lined with BC are more legible. Moreover, only the papers restored with BC show high changes in porosity. The aging process leads to a slight decrement in burst index. Changes on tear index and optical properties with the aging process depend on the paper to be restored. This study suggests that BC improves deteriorated paper quality, without altering the information contained therein, and that this improvement is maintained over time. Hence, BC is a promising alternative material for the restoration of paper.
KeywordsContact Angle Aging Process Bacterial Cellulose Static Contact Angle Dynamic Contact Angle
The authors wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation for funding this study via Project CTQ 2010-17702, and the Madrid Regional Goverment via Project RETO PROSOST P2013-MAE2907.
- 2.Lindström T (2009) Sizing. In: Ek M, Gellerstedt G, Henriksson G (eds) Pulp and paper chemistry and technology, vol 3., De Gruyter, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 275–318Google Scholar
- 4.Sparks P (1990) Technical considerations in choosing mass deacidification processes. Washington, D.C, Commission on Preservation and AccessGoogle Scholar
- 5.Ardelean E, Bobu E, Niculescu GH, Groza C (2011) Effects of different consolidation additives on ageing behavior of archived document paper. Cell Chem Technol 45:97–103Google Scholar
- 7.Chávez-Pacheco JL, Martínez-Yee S, Contreras-Zentella M, Escamilla-Marván E (2004) Celulosa Bacteriana en Gluconacetobacter xylinum: biosíntesis y aplicaciones. Rev Esp Cienc Quím Biol 7:18–25Google Scholar
- 8.El-Saied H, El-Diwany AI, Basta AH, Atwa NA, El-Ghawas DE (2008) Production and characterization of economical bacterial cellulose. BioResources 3:1196–1217Google Scholar
- 11.Brown RM (1989) Microbial cellulose as a building block resource for specialty products and processes therefore, PCT Int Appl WO 8912107 A1, 37Google Scholar
- 20.Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Villar JC (2013) The effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on bacterial cellulose production and properties from Gluconacetobacter sucrofermentans CECT 7291 focused on its use in degraded paper restoration. BioResources 8:3630–3645Google Scholar
- 26.Moutinho I, Figueiredo M, Ferreira PJ (2004) Influência dos agentes de colagem superficial na estrutura do papel—uma análise química. In: Jiménez L, Villar JC (eds) Proceedings of III CIADICYP. INIA, Madrid, pp 377–383Google Scholar
- 27.Etzler FM, Buche M, Bobalek JF, Weiss MA (1995) Surface free energy of paper and inks: printability issues. Papermakers conference, Chicago, TAPPI Press: pp 383–394Google Scholar
- 29.Area C, Cheradame H (2011) Paper aging and degradation: recent findings and research methods. BioResources 6:5307–5337Google Scholar