Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 50, Issue 13, pp 4536–4546 | Cite as

Nanoporous Ag2O photocatalysts based on copper terephthalate metal–organic frameworks

Original Paper


We report the nanoporous Ag2O based on the copper terephthalate metal–organic frameworks (Ag2O/MOF) photocatalyst. Ag2O/MOF nanostructure was formed via oxygen treatment of Ag/MOF nanoparticles. The resulting Ag2O/MOF photocatalysts were characterised by various techniques. Results showed that the synthesised Ag2O/MOF nanocomposite exhibited dramatic separation of photoinduced electron/hole and excellent photodegradation activity under visible light irradiation. The degradation rate of acid blue 92 using Ag2O/MOF nanocomposite is found to be higher than that using pure MOF and Ag/MOF. It was divulged that the photodegradation rate is increased by oxygen treatment of Ag in Ag/MOF structure. The possible mechanism for the enhanced photocatalytic properties of the Ag2O/MOF nanocomposite was also discussed. Similar to the mechanism proposed in the photodegradation by the other semiconductors, we propose that the photodegradation mechanism involves the generation of nonselective hydroxyl radicals concluding from the photoexcitation of the Ag2O semiconductor. All these results suggested that the catalysis occurs on the surface of nanocomposite, whose surface are covered with the Ag2O photocatalysts. The observed results on the both rate and efficiency of photodegradation are discussed in terms of (1) the surface area of synthesised MOF covered with Ag (Ag2O) and (2) separation of e /h + pairs. Our research paves the way to design and develop highly effective and stable visible light-induced photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants for water purification.


Photocatalytic Activity Visible Light Irradiation Photocatalytic Reaction Ag2O Silver Atom 


  1. 1.
    Liu Y, Su G, Zhang B, Jiang G, Yan B (2011) Nanoparticle-based strategies for detection and remediation of environmental pollutants. Analyst 136:872–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szygul A, Guibal E, Palacin MA, Ruiz M, Sastre AM (2009) Removal of an anionic dye (Acid Blue 92) by coagulation–flocculation using chitosan. J Environ Manag 90:2979–2986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Du J, Lai X, Yang N, Zhai J, Kisailus D, Su F, Wang D (2011) Hierarchically ordered macro—mesoporous TiO2—graphene composite films: improved mass transfer, reduced charge recombination, and their enhanced photocatalytic activities. ACS Nano 5:590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu R, Liu Y, Liu C, Luo S, Teng Y, Yang L, Yang R, Cai Q (2011) Enhanced photoelectrocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by CuInS2 nanoparticles deposition onto TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Alloys Compd 509:2434–2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cun W, Xinming W, Jincai Z, Bixian M, Guoying S, Ping’an P, Jiamo F (2002) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic property of nano-sized Zn2SnO4. J Mater Sci 37:2989–2996. doi: 10.1023/A:1016077216172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanaor DAH, Sorrell CC (2011) Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation. J Mater Sci 46:855–874. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou W, Liu H, Wang J, Liu D, Du G, Cui J (2010) Ag2O/TiO2 nanobelts heterostructure with enhanced ultraviolet and visible photocatalytic activity. Appl Mater Interfaces 2:2385–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ksibi M, Rossignol S, Tatibouet JM, Trapalis C (2008) Synthesis and solid characterization of nitrogen and sulfur doped TiO2 photocatalysts active under near visible light. Mater Lett 62:4204–4206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Diaz FJ, Chow AT, O’Geen AT, Dahlgren RA, Wong PK (2009) Effect of constructed wetlands receiving agricultural return flows on disinfection byproduct precursors. Water Res 43:2750–2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lyu LM, Huang MH (2011) Investigation of relative stability of different facets of Ag2O nanocrystals through face-selective etching. J Phys Chem C 115:17768–17773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang X, Li S, Yu H, Yu J, Liu S (2011) Ag2O as a new visible-light photocatalyst: self-stability and high photocatalytic activity. Chem Eur J 17:7777–7780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tudela D (2008) Silver (II) Oxide or silver (I, III) oxide? J Chem Educ 85:863–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carson CG, Hardcastle K, Schwartz J, Liu X, Hoffmann C, Gerhardt RA, Tannenbaum R (2009) Synthesis and structure characterization of copper terephthalate metal–organic frameworks, Eur J Inorg Chem 2338–2343Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mori W, Inoue F, Yoshida K, Nakayama H, Takamizawa S, Kishita M (1997) Synthesis of new adsorbent copper(II) terephthalate. Chem Lett 26:1219–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dhakshinamoorthy A, Garcia H (2012) Catalysis by metal nanoparticles embedded on metal–organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 41:5262–5284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petit C, Bandosz TJ (2009) MOF–graphite oxide composites: combining the uniqueness of graphene layers and metal-organic frameworks. Adv Mater 21:4753–4757Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dhakshinamoorthy A, Alvaro M, Garcia H (2011) Metal–organic frameworks as heterogeneous catalysts for oxidation reactions. Catal Sci Technol 1:856–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gascon J, Hernández-Alonso MD, Almeida AR et al (2008) Isoreticular MOFs as efficient photocatalysts with tunable band gap: an operando FTIR study of the photoinduced oxidation of propylene. ChemSusChem 1:981–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sarkar D, Ghosh CK, Mukherjee S, Chattopadhyay KK (2013) Three dimensional Ag2O/TiO2 type-II (p—n) nanoheterojunctions for superior photocatalytic activity. Appl Mater Interfaces 5:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang G, Ma X, Huang B, Cheng H, Wang Z, Zhan J, Qin X, Zhang X, Dai Y (2012) Controlled synthesis of Ag2O microcrystals with facet-dependent photocatalytic activities. J Mater Chem 22:21189–21194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elahifard MR, Rahimnejad S, Haghighi S, Gholami MR (2007) Apatite-coated Ag/AgBr/TiO2 visible-light photocatalyst for destruction of bacteria. J Am Chem Soc 129:9552–9553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corma A, Garcı´a H, Llabre´s i Xamena FX (2010) Engineering metal organic frameworks for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Rev 110:4606–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang D, Choi D, Li J, Yang Z, Nie Z et al (2009) Self-assembled TiO2–graphene hybrid nanostructures for enhanced Li–ion insertion. ACS Nano 3:907–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guo HL, Wang XF, Qian QY, Wang FB, Xia XH (2009) A green approach to the synthesis of graphene nanosheets. ACS Nano 3:2653–2659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bai X, Zong R, Li C, Liu D, Liu Y, Zhu Y (2014) Enhancement of visible photocatalytic activity via Ag@C3N4 core–shell plasmonic composite. J Appl Catal 147:82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mohaghegh N, Tasviri M, Rahimi E, Gholami MR (2014) Nano sized ZnO composites: preparation, characterization and application as photocatalysts for degradation of AB92 azo dye. Mater Sci Semicond Process 21:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang H, Xu P, Du G, Chen Z, Oh K, Pan D, Jiao Z (2011) A facile one-step synthesis of TiO2/graphene composites for photodegradation of methyl orange. Nano Res 4:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA et al (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45:1558–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen LC, Ho YC, Guo WS, Huang CM, Pan TC (2009) Enhanced visible light-induced photoelectrocatalytic degradation of phenol by carbon nanotube-doped TiO2 electrodes. Electrochim Acta 54:3884–3891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Banerjee S, Maity AK, Chakravorty D (2000) Quantum confinement effect in heat treated silver oxide nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 87:8541–8544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yen CW, Mahmoud MA, El-Sayed MA (2009) Photocatalysis in gold nanocage nanoreactors. J Phys Chem A 113:4340–4345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bahr Y, Mahmoud MA (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by gold silver nano-core/silica nano-shell. J Phys Chem Solids 68:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fan W, Lai Q, Zhang Q, Wang Y (2011) Nanocomposites of TiO2 and reduced graphene oxide as efficient photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. J Phys Chem C 115:10694–10701CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neda Mohaghegh
    • 1
  • Sahar Kamrani
    • 1
  • Mahboubeh Tasviri
    • 2
  • Mohammadreza Elahifard
    • 3
  • Mohammadreza Gholami
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistrySharif University of TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of EngineeringUniversity of ArdakanArdakanIran

Personalised recommendations