Skip to main content

Fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete with ambient curing for in situ applications

Journal of Materials Science volume 49, pages 4297–4304 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete is proven to have excellent engineering properties with a reduced carbon footprint. It not only reduces the greenhouse gas emissions (compared to Portland cement-based concrete) but also utilises a large amount of industrial waste materials such as fly ash and slag. Due to these positive attributes, it is becoming an increasingly popular construction material. Previous studies on geopolymer concrete report that heat curing plays an important role in gaining higher compressive strength values (as opposed to ambient curing), and hence the application of this material could be limited to precast members. Therefore, this research was aimed at investigating the effect of heat curing by comparing the mechanical properties such as compressive strength and ductility of ambient cured and heat cured geopolymer concrete samples. It is worth noting that there was marginal strength change due to heat curing. In Australia, fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete is being used in precast panels in underground constructions. Commercially available geopolymer cement and synthetic fibres are effectively being used to produce elements that are more durable than what is currently used in industry. As a result, this research investigated the effects of polypropylene fibres in geopolymer concrete using 0.05 and 0.15 % fibres (by weight). The addition of polypropylene fibres enhances the compressive strength and the ductility of geopolymer concrete.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, Riessen A, Corder GD (2011) Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to Ordinary Portland Cement. J Clean Prod 19:1080–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rangan BV (2008) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Curtin University of Technology, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wallah SE (2010) Creep behaviour of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Civil Eng Dimens 12:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  4. Intelligence M (2013) World Cement Consumption. http://www.betonabq.org/images/imguser/WorldReport_Aug_2013final__01__cement.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2014

  5. Davidovits J (1988) Geopolymer chemistry and properties. Proceedings of Geopolymer ‘88, First European Conference on Soft Mineralurgy, The Geopolymer Institute, Compiegne, 25–48.

  6. Deevasan KK, Ranganath RV (2010) Geopolymer concrete using industrial byproducts. Constr Mater 164:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ, Rangan BV (2005) Fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Aust J Struct Eng 6:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  8. Memon FA, Nuruddin MF, Demie S, Shafiq N (2011) Effect of curing conditions on strength of fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 80:860–863

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pan Z, Sanjayan JG, Rangan BV (2011) Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete. Mag Concr Res 63:763–771

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neville A, Brooks J (2004) Concrete technology. Pearson Education, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karahan O, Tanyildizi H, Atis C (2009) Statistical analysis for strength properties of polypropylene-fibre-reinforced fly ash concrete. Mag Concr Res 61:557–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swamy RN, Bahia HM (1985) The effectiveness of steel fibres as shear reinforcement. Concr Int 7:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sabir B (2001) Toughness and tortuosity of polypropylene fibre reinforced concrete. Mag Concr Res 53:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wimpenny D, Duxson P, Cooper T, Provis J, Zeuschner R (2011) Fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete products for underground infrastructure. http://www.halcrow.com/Documents/australia/FRGC_products_for_undergound_infrastructure.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2013

  15. Chindaprasirt P, Chareerat T, Sirivivatnanon V (2007) Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cement Concr Compos 29:224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo X, Shi H, Dick WA (2010) Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer. Cement Concr Compos 32:142–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivia M, Nikraz H (2012) Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Mater Des 36:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao R, Sanjayan JG (2011) Geopolymer and Portland cement concretes in simulated fire. Mag Concr Res 63:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Australia S (1999) Method of testing concrete, Method 9: determination of the compressive strength of concrete specimens, pp. 13

  20. Concrete Institute of Australia (2011) Recommended practice: geopolymer concrete. Concrete Institute of Australia, West Perth

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vijai K, Kumutha R, Vishnuram B (2012) Experimental investigations on mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete composites. Asian J Civ Eng (Build Hous) 13:89–96

    Google Scholar 

  22. Collins MP, Mitchell D, MacGregor JG (1993) Structural design considerations for high strength concrete. ACI Concr Int 15:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ahn JM, Shin SW (2007) An evaluation of ductility of high-strength reinforced concrete columns subjected to reversed cyclic loads under axial compression. Mag Concr Res 59:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paultre P, Eid R, Robles HI, Bouaanani N (2009) Seismic performance of circular high-strength concrete columns. ACI Struct J 106:395–404

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rui J, Jin-qing J, Shi-lang X (2007) Seismic ductility of very-high-strength-concrete short columns subject to combined axial loading and cyclic lateral loading. J Chongqing Univ: English Edition 6:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  26. Woods JM, Kiousis PD, Ehsani MR, Saadatmanesh H (2007) Bending ductility of rectangular high strength concrete columns. Eng Struct 29:1783–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pan Z, Sanjayan JG, Rangan BV (2009) An investigation of the mechanisms for strength gain or loss of geopolymer mortar after exposure to elevated temperature. J Mater Sci 44:1873–1880. doi:10.1007/s10853-009-3243-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Foster S, Kilpatrick AE, Warner RF (2010) In reinforced concrete basics analysis and design of reinforced concrete structures, 2nd edn. Frenchs Forest, NSW

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Construction and Maintenance, Toowoomba Regional Council, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia

    Mark Reed

  2. Centre of Excellence in Engineered Fibre Composites (CEEFC), Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences, School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland (USQ), Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia

    Weena Lokuge & Warna Karunasena

Authors
  1. Mark Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weena Lokuge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Warna Karunasena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weena Lokuge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reed, M., Lokuge, W. & Karunasena, W. Fibre-reinforced geopolymer concrete with ambient curing for in situ applications. J Mater Sci 49, 4297–4304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8125-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8125-3

Keywords

  • Compressive Strength
  • Geopolymer
  • Polypropylene Fibre
  • Sodium Silicate Solution
  • Geopolymer Concrete