Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling the deformation of a confectionery wafer as a non-uniform sandwich structure

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research was to model the mechanical behaviour of wafers found in various confectionery products in order to optimise the manufacturing stage. Compression and bending tests showed that the mechanical behaviour of the wafer was characteristic of a brittle foam. The internal microstructure of the wafer sheet was examined with an optical microscope which showed that the wafer possessed a sandwich structure with a porous core between two denser skins. An analytical model was developed to calculate the individual moduli of the wafer core and skin sections. These modulus values were used in a finite element (FE) model which consisted of a simple repetitive geometry. The FE model simulated the linear deformation of the wafer under compression and bending. The predictions from the analytical and numerical models were compared. They were found to agree in compression but deviated under bending due to the large mismatch of the core and skin moduli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fusheng H, Zhengang Z (1999) J Mater Sci 34:291. doi:10.1023/A:1004401521842

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fusheng H, Zhengang Z, Junchang G (1998) Metall Mater Trans 29:1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids structure and properties, 1st edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maire E, Fazekas A, Salvo L, Dendievel R, Youssef S, Cloetens P, Letang JM (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Luyten H, Plijter JJ, Van Vliet T (2004) J Texture Stud 35:445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollien A, Conde Y, Pambaguian L, Mortensen A (2005) Mater Sci Eng 404:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCormack TM, Miller R, Kesler O, Gibson LJ (2001) Int J Solids Struct 38:4901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bart-Smith H, Hutchinson JW, Evans AG (2001) Int J Mech Sci 43:1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Steeves CA, Fleck NA (2004) Int J Mech Sci 46:585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Timoshenko S (1955) Strength of materials: Part 1. Elementary, 3rd edn. Krieger Pub Co, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  11. Timoshenko S (1958) Strength of materials: part 2. Advanced, 3rd edn. Krieger Pub Co, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rizov V, Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) Compos Struct 69:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rizov VI (2006) Comput Mater Sci 35:107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mills NJ, Fitzgerald C, Gilchrist A, Verdejo R (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:2389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mills NJ, Gilchrist A (2008) Int J Impact Eng 35:1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vallès-Pàmies B (2008) Hydration-induced textural changes in cereal products. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham

  17. Traitler N (2007) Physical and mechanical properties of biopolymer cellular solids. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge

  18. Warburton SC, Donald AM, Smith AC (1990) J Mater Sci 25:4001. doi:10.1007/BF00582472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Standard test method for determination of modulus of elasticity for rigid and semi-rigid plastic specimens by controlled rate of loading using three-point bending1 designation: D5934–02

  20. ASTM Designation: D 5934-02. Standard test method for determination of modulus of elasticity for rigid and semi-rigid plastic specimens by controlled rate of loading using three-point bending

  21. Williams JG (1980) Stress analysis of polymers, 2nd edn. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benham PP, Crawford RJ, Armstrong CG (1996) Mechanics of engineering materials, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abaqus Version 6.9. Hibbitt Karlsson and Sorensen Inc, Providence, RI

  24. Simulia (2009) ABAQUS user manual, version 6.9-1

  25. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) J Mech Phys Solids 48:1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mohammed IK (2011) Mechanical characterisation of confectionery wafers. PhD Thesis, Imperial College London

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nestle PTC York for funding the studentship and for supplying materials for testing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. N. Charalambides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohammed, I.K., Charalambides, M.N., Williams, J.G. et al. Modelling the deformation of a confectionery wafer as a non-uniform sandwich structure. J Mater Sci 48, 2462–2478 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-7034-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-7034-6

Keywords

Navigation