Abstract
This article reviews the thermal transport properties as predicted by 26 classical interatomic potentials for uranium dioxide, an important nuclear fuel material, determined using a lattice dynamics-based method. The calculations reveal structural instabilities for multiple potentials, as well as the presence of lower energy structures even for potentials in which the fluorite structure is stable. Both rigid atom and shell model potentials are considered, and general trends in their representation of the thermal conductivity are identified. Reviewed classical potentials predict thermal conductivity in the range of ~5–22 W/mK, compared to the experimental value of 8.9 W/mK. The quality of the anharmonicity correction that is based on the correlation between thermal expansion and thermal conductivity is investigated, and it found to generally improve thermal conductivities results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Verrall R, Lucuta P (1996) J Nucl Mater 228(2):251
Hutchings MT (1987) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2(83):1083
Martin D (1988) J Nucl Mater 152(2–3):94
Kang KH, Ryu HJ, Song KC, Yang MS (2002) J Nucl Mater 301(2–3):242
Pillai C, George A (1993) J Nucl Mater 200(1):78
Lucuta PG, Matzke H, Verrall RA (1995) J Nucl Mater 223(1):51
Ronchi C, Sheindlin M, Musella M, Hyland GJ (1999) J Appl Phys 85(2):776
Dudarev SL, Botton GA, Savrasov SY, Szotek Z, Temmerman WM, Sutton AP (1998) Phys Status Solid (A) 166(1):429
Kudin KN, Scuseria GE, Martin RL (2002) Phys Rev Lett 89:266402
Sanati M, Albers RC, Lookman T, Saxena A (2011) Phys Rev B 84:014116
Yu J, Devanathan R, Weber WJ (2009) J Phys: Condens Matter 21(43):435401
Catlow CRA (1977) P Roy Soc A-Math Phy 353(1675):533
van Duin ACT, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA (2001) J Phys Chem A 105(41):9396
Shan T-R, Devine BD, Hawkins JM, Asthagiri A, Phillpot SR, Sinnott SB (2010) Phys Rev B 82(23):235302
Tiwary P, van de Walle A, Grønbech-Jensen N (2009) Phys Rev B 80:174302
Govers K, Lemehov S, Hou M, Verwerft M (2007) J Nucl Mater 366(1–2):161
Skomurski FN, Ewing RC, Rohl AL, Gale JD, Becker U (2006) Am Mineral 91(11–12):1761
Goel P, Choudhury N, Chaplot S (2008) J Nucl Mater 377(3):438
Yakub E, Ronchi C, Staicu D (2010) J Nucl Mater 400(3):189
Read MS, Jackson RA (2010) J Nucl Mater 406(3):293
Lindan P, Gillan M (1991) J Phys: Condens Matter 3(22):3929
Motoyama S, Ichikawa Y, Hiwatari Y, Oe A (1999) Phys Rev B 60:292
Yamada K, Kurosaki K, Uno M, Yamanaka S (2000) J Alloys Compd 307:1
Arima T, Yamasaki S, Inagaki Y, Idemitsu K (2005) J Alloys Compd 400(1–2):43
Watanabe T, Sinnott SB, Tulenko JS, Grimes RW, Schelling PK, Phillpot SR (2008) J Nucl Mater 375(3):388
Ward A, Broido DA, Stewart DA, Deinzer G (2009) Phys Rev B 80(12):125203
Chernatynskiy A, Phillpot SR (2010) Phys Rev B 82(13):134301
Chernatynskiy A, Turney JE, McGaughey AJH, Amon CH, Phillpot SR (2011) J Am Ceram Soc 94(10):3523
Maradudin AA, Fein AE (1962) Phys Rev 128:2589
Turney JE, McGaughey AJH, Amon CH (2009) Phys Rev B 79(22):224305
Krishnan R, Srinivasan R, Devanarayanan S (1979) In: Thermal expansion of crystals. Franklin Book Company, New York
Dick BG, Overhauser AW (1958) Phys Rev 112(1):90
Oitmaa J (1967) Aust J Phys 20(5):495
Desai TG, Uberuaga BP (2009) Scr Mater 60(10):878
Fink JK (2000) J Nucl Mater 279(1):1
Klemens P (1958) In: Solid state physics, vol. 7. Academic Press, New York, p 1
Roufosse M, Klemens PG (1973) Phys Rev B 7:5379
Acknowledgements
We are happy to thank Mark Read for making his potential available to us prior to publication. We would also like to thank Pratyush Tiwary for discussions of his potential. This study was authored by subcontractors (AC, SRP) of the U.S. Government under DOE Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517, under the Energy Frontier Research Center (Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science, FWP 1356). Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains and the publisher (by accepting the article for publication) acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. The study of SBS was funded by DOE Nuclear Energy Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) Campaign, Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program, FUELS: Integrated Performance and Safety Codes and Models project. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the US DOE under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396. This research was also supported in part by the National Science Foundation through TeraGrid resources under grant number TG-DMR100051.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chernatynskiy, A., Flint, C., Sinnott, S.B. et al. Critical assessment of UO2 classical potentials for thermal conductivity calculations. J Mater Sci 47, 7693–7702 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6230-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-6230-0