Skip to main content
Log in

Separation of proteins from aqueous solution using cellulose acetate/poly (vinyl chloride) blend ultrafiltration membrane

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cellulose acetate (CA) membranes are widely used for ultrafiltration applications. CA and poly (vinyl chloride) (PVC) blend membranes are prepared by using polar solvent of N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) by phase inversion method. Polyethylene glycol (PEG 600) is used as polymeric additive in the casting solution. The effect of polymer composition and additive concentration on surface morphology, porosity are studied. The morphology of prepared membranes is found to have asymmetric structure with dense skin layer and porous sub-layer. Applications of these membranes are carried out for rejection and permeation of macromolecular proteins such as trypsin, pepsin, egg albumin, bovine serum albumin. On increasing the concentration of PVC and PEG 600, protein rejection decreases whereas permeate flux increases.CA/PVC/PEG (70/30/10 wt%) blend membrane shows the highest permeation flux of 211.1 lm−2 h−1 for trypsin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pollution prevention and abatement hand book (1998) Dairy Industry World Bank, p 295

  2. Haitao Z, Chengyao W, Yunlong Z (2010) J Mater Sci 45:2296. doi:10.1007/s10853-009-4191-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iritani E, Mukai Y, Murase T (1995) Sep Sci Technol 30:369. doi:10.1080/01496399508013877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan R, Chen V, Bucknall MP (2002) Desalination 146:83. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00493-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Granja PL, Barbosa MA, Pouys L (2001) J Mater Sci 36:2163. doi:10.1023/A:1017587815583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayama M, Yamamoto K, Kohori F et al (2004) J Membr Sci 234:41. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2004.01.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Qin JJ, Li Y, Lee LS, Lee H (2003) J Membr Sci 218:173. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00170-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nowak KM, Kowalska I, Korbutowicz MK (2005) Desalination 184:415. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yellin N, Zelingher N, Ben-Dor L (1986) J Mater Sci 21:504. doi:10.1007/BF01145515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiaoyu H, Changfa X, Shulin A, Guangxia J (2007) J Mater Sci 42:6234. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-1107-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brousse Cl, Chapurlat R, Quentin JP (1976) Desalination 18:137. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(00)84098-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang T, Sun B, Li W (1995) First Membrane Industry report Meeting, Membrane industry association of China, Beijing, p 190

  13. Ramesh Babu P, Galker VG (2000) Appl Polym Sci 77:2606. doi:10.1002/1097-4628(20000919)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng Y, Sui Y (2006) Desalination 196:13. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karus MA, Nemas M, Frommer MA (1979) J Appl Polym Sci 23:445. doi:10.1002/app.1979.070230214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boom RM, Wienk IM, Boomgaard T et al (1992) J Membr Sci 73:277. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(92)80135-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wienk IM, Boom RM, Beerlage MAM et al (1996) J Membr Sci 113:361. doi:10.1016/0376-7388(95)00256-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jimenez DBM, Narbaitz RM, Matsuura T et al (2004) J Membr Sci 231:209. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yeo HT, Lee ST, Han MJ (2000) J Chem Eng Jpn 33:180. ISSN: 0021-9592

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arthanareeswaran G, Thanikaivelan P, Srinivasn K et al (2004) Eur Polym J 40:2153. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.04.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Munari S, Botino A, Camera-Roda G et al (1990) Desalination 77:85. doi:10.1016/0011-9164(90)85022-3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saljoughi E, Sadrzadeh M, Mohammadi T (2009) J Membr Sci 326:627. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman MM, Graft JF, Painter P (1991) Miscible polymer blends. Technomic Publishing, Lancaster. http://pslc.ws/macrogcss/blend.html

  24. Kim JH, Lee KH (1998) J Membr Sci 138:153. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00224-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dunweg G, Lother S, Wolfgang A (1995) US Patent 5, 403, 485

  26. Kim IC, Lee KH (2004) J Membr Sci 230:183. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2003.11.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arthanareeswaran G, Latha CS, Mohan D et al. (2006) Sep Sci Technol 41: 2895. doi:10.1080/0149390600786192

  28. Brinck J, Jonsson AS, Jonsson B et al (2000) J Membr Sci 164:187. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00212-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukai Y, Iritani E, Murase T (1998) Sep Sci Technol 33:169. doi:10.1080/01496399808544762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lakshmi Krishnamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishnamoorthy, L., Arif, P.M. & Ahmedkhan, R. Separation of proteins from aqueous solution using cellulose acetate/poly (vinyl chloride) blend ultrafiltration membrane. J Mater Sci 46, 2914–2921 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5166-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5166-0

Keywords

Navigation