Abstract
0.7 mm sheets of blends of polycarbonate (PC) with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) rich in PC in the presence and absence of three different transesterification catalysts have been obtained using reactive extrusion-calendering processing method in order to evaluate the fracture toughness of these materials applying the essential work of fracture (EWF) approach which has not been previously reported in the literature. The morphology has been characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, the tensile properties of these materials were determined. There is a decrease on the essential term (w e) values of PC/PET blends without transesterification catalysts while blends with transesterification catalysts present an increment in comparison with neat PC which may related to the product of the transesterification that plays like an emulsifier/compatibilizing agent to reduce the interfacial tension between the components of the blend and reduce the interfacial tension between the two immiscible or incompatible component phases to get a better fracture behavior. This is confirmed by the tensile test results obtained which demonstrate higher values for E and σ y in the case of blends with transesterification catalysts compared with neat PC. For non-essential term of fracture (βw p), blends without catalysts exhibit an increase compared with neat PC by increasing the amount of PET which may due to the lowering of the yielding stress. In contrary, the presence of transesterification catalysts and especially Zn-based shows decrease as a consequence of the restriction that occurred on the movement of PC segments during the transesterification reactions or as a decohesion of the dispersed phase during the test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nadkarni VM, Rath AK (2002) Handbook of thermoplastic polyesters: homopolymers, copolymers, blends, and composites. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Germany
Pilati F, Marianucci E, Berti C (1985) J Appl Polym Sci 30:1267
Nassar TR, Paul DR, Barlow JW (1979) J Appl Polym Sci 23:85
Linder M, Henrichs PM, Hewitt JM, Massa DJ (1985) J Chem Phys 82:1585
Makarewics PJ, Wilkes GL (1979) J Appl Polym Sci 23:1619
Abis A, Braglia R, Camurati I, Merlo E, Natarajan KM, Elwood D, Mylonakis SG (1994) J Appl Polym Sci 52:1431
Suzuki T, Tanaka H, Nishi T (1989) Polymer 30:1287
Fakirov S (1999) Transreactions in condensation polymers. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Germany
Zhang GY, Ma JW, Cui BX, Luo XL, Ma DZ (2001) Macromol Chem Phys 202:604
Murff SR, Barlow JW, Paul DR (1984) J Appl Polym Sci 29:3231
Ignatov VN, Carraro C, Tartari V, Pippa R, Scapin M, Pilati F, Berti C, Toselli M, Fiorini M (1996) Polymer 37:5883
Marchese P, Celli A, Fiorini M (2002) Macromol Chem Phys 203:695
Garcia M, Eguiazabal JI, Nazabal J (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 81:121
Fraisse F, Verney V, Commereuc S, Obadal M (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 90:250
Maspoch MLI, Henault V, Ferrer-Balas D, Velasco JI, Santana OO (2000) Polym Test 19:559
Hashemi S (1997) Polym Eng Sci 37:912
Karger-Kocsis J, Czigány T (1996) Polymer 37:2433
Mai YW, Cotterell B, Horlyck R, Vigna G (1987) Polym Eng Sci 27:804
Al-Jabareen A (2009) Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends prepared by reactive extrusion: thermal and mechanical characterization. Universitat Polytecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Mai YW, Cotterell B (1986) Int J Fract 32:105
Broberg KB (1968) Int J Fract 4:11
Karger-Kocsis J, Czigány T, Moskala EJ (1997) Polymer 38:4587
Clutton EQ (2000) In: Williams JG, Pavan A (eds) ESIS TC4 experience with the essential work of fracture method. European Structural Integrity Society, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
Maspoch MLl, Gámez-Pérez J, Gordillo A, Sánchez-Soto M, Velasco JI (2002) Polymer 43:4177
Sánchez JJ (2003) Comportamiento térmico y mecánico del poli(etilén tereftalato) (PET) modificado con resinas poliméricas basadas en bisfenol-A. Uinversitat Polytecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Li Z-M, Yang W (2004) Macromol Mater Eng 289:426
Moore DR, Pavan A, Williams JG (2001) Fracture mechanics testing methods for polymers, adhesives and composites. ESIS Publication 28, Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam, Holland
Karger-Kocsis J, Moskala EJ, Shang PP (2001) J Therm Anal Calorim 63:671
Chan WYF, Williams JG (1994) Polymer 35:1666
Paton CA, Hashemi S (1992) J Mater Sci 27:2279. doi:10.1007/BF01105033
Hashemi S (1993) J Mater Sci 28:6178. doi:10.1007/BF00365040
Hashemi S (2000) J Mater Sci 35:5851. doi:10.1023/A:1026704323702
Yuan YL, Wu CML, Li RKY (2007) Polym Test 26:102
Sikka M, Pellagrini NN, Schmitt EA, Winey KZ (1997) Macromolecules 30:445
Kulasekere R, Kaiser H, Ankner JF, Russell TP, Brown HR, Hawker CJ, Mayes AM (1996) Macromolecules 29:5493
Acknowledgements
The authors express their thanks to Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación – Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional (AECI) for the funding of a doctoral research scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Jabareen, A., Illescas, S., Maspoch, M.L. et al. Essential work of fracture testing of PC-rich PET/PC blends with and without transesterification catalysts. J Mater Sci 45, 2907–2915 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4282-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4282-1