Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 701–705 | Cite as

Wear characteristics of a new type austenitic stainless steel

  • Jianjian Ye
  • Zhiwei Lai
  • Yuhua WenEmail author
  • Ning Li


In order to solve the problem of the poor wear resistance in conventional austenitic stainless steels, a new type austenitic stainless steel was designed based on Fe–Mn–Si–Cr–Ni shape memory alloys in this article. Studies on its wear resistance and wear mechanism have been carried out by comparison with that of AISI 321 stainless steel using friction wear tests, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscope. Results showed that the wear resistance of Fe–14Mn–5.5Si–12Cr–5Ni–0.10C alloy was better than that of AISI 321 stainless steel both in dry and oily friction conditions owing to the occurrence of the stress-induced γ → ε martensitic phase transformation during friction process. This article also compared the corrosion performance of the two stainless steels by testing the corrosion rate. Results showed that the corrosion rate of Fe–14Mn–5.5Si–12Cr–5Ni–0.10C alloy was notably lower in NaOH solution and higher in NaCl solution than that of AISI 321 stainless steel.


Austenite Martensite Wear Resistance Corrosion Rate Martensitic Transformation 



The study was supported by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-06-0793).


  1. 1.
    Michal GM, Ernst F, Kahn H, Cao Y, Oba F, Agarwal N, Heuer AH (2006) Acta Mater 54:1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richter E, Guenzel R, Parasacandola S, Telbizova T, Kruse O, Moeller W (2000) Surf Coat Technol 128–129:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun Y, Bell T (1998) Wear 218:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lei MK, Zhu XM (2005) Surf Coat Technol 193:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viswanathan A, Sastikumar D, Rajarajan P, Kumar H, Nath AK (2007) Opt Laser Technol 39:1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wei R (1996) Surf Coat Technol 83:218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flis J, Mankowski J, Rolinski E (1989) Surf Eng 5:151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rolinski E (1987) Surf Eng 3:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamauchi N, Okamoto A, Tukahara H, Demizu K, Ueda N, Sone T, Hirose Y (2003) Surf Coat Technol 174–175:465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Otsuka H, Tanasashi H et al (1990) Mater Sci Forum 5:451Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu XM, Zhang YS (1997) J Mater Sci Lett 16:1516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sato A, Chishima E, Soma K, Mori T (1982) Acta Metall 30:1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato A, Chishima E, Yamaji Y, Mori T (1984) Acta Metall 32:539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Otsuka H, Yamada H, Maruyama T, Tanasashi H et al (1990) ISIJ Int 30:674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wen YH, Yan M, Li N (2004) Scr Mater 50:441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin CX, Wang GX, Wu YD, Wang JG, Zhang JJ (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 438–440:804Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Söderberg O, Liu XW, Yakovenko PG, Ullakko K, Lindroos VK (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 273–275:543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang X, Wan JF, Chen SP, Hsu TY (2002) J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 36:21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations