Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 3088–3097 | Cite as

Effects of curing time and temperature on strength development of inorganic polymeric binder based on natural pozzolan

  • Ebrahim Najafi Kani
  • Ali AllahverdiEmail author


This paper reports the results of a study on the influence of curing conditions on compressive strength development in inorganic polymeric binder prepared from natural pozzolan. Three mixes with different chemical formulations were prepared and cured hydrothermally at different temperatures and times. In particular, the effect of a precuring at an atmosphere of more than 95% relative humidity at room temperature on compressive strength development before the application of heat was studied. Different curing regimes including hydrothermal treatment in steam-saturated atmosphere at different temperatures of 45, 65, 85 °C and for different time periods of 5, 10, 15, and 20 h after 1 and 7 days of precuring were applied. The mix exhibiting the maximum compressive strength after hydrothermal treatment was selected and cured in autoclave at temperatures of 125, 150, 180, and 210 °C for different time periods of 20, 30, 40, and 50 h for investigating the effects of higher times and temperatures of curing on strength development and also to determine the maximum achievable compressive strength. Results show that relatively long precuring in humid atmosphere is very beneficial for compressive strength development. The highest compressive strength achieved for three different regimes of curing including 28 days at an atmosphere of more than 95% relative humidity at 25 °C, 20 h hydrothermal treatment at 85 °C after 1 day precuring, and 20 h hydrothermal treatment at 85 °C after 7 days precuring were 37.5, 37.5, and 57.5 MPa, respectively. The maximum achievable compressive strength under autoclave curing at 210 °C for 30 h after 7 days of precuring was 108.7 MPa.


Compressive Strength Geopolymer Hydrothermal Treatment Strength Development High Compressive Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Davidovits J (1999) In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on geopolymer, Saint-Quentin, France, p 9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barbosa VFF, MacKenzie KJD (2003) Mater Res Bull 38:319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu H, van Deventer JSJ (2000) Int J Miner Process 59:247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakharev T (2005) Cem Concr Res 35:1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA (2002) Appl Geochem 17:1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT (1999) Cem Concr Res 29:1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang W, Roy D (1990) Am Ceram Soc Bull 71:642Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Perera DS, Uchida O, Vance ER, Finnie KS (2007) J Mater Sci 42:3099. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2002) Chem Eng J 89:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allahverdi A, Najafi Kani E (2008) In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on non-traditional cement and concrete, Brno, Czech Republic, p 8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allahverdi A, Mehrpour K, Najafi Kani E (2008) IUST Int J Eng Sci 19:1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clayden NJ, Esposito S, Aronne A, Pernice P (1999) J Non-Cryst Solids 258:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ortego JD, Barroeta Y (1991) Environ Sci Technol 25:1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyNarmak, TehranIran

Personalised recommendations