Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 463–468 | Cite as

Mechanical property under high dynamic loading and microstructure evaluation of a TiB2 particle-reinforced stainless steel

  • H. Nahme
  • E. LachEmail author
  • A. Tarrant


The incorporation of low density, high modulus ceramic particles into a steel matrix is a potential route to improve the mechanical performance of steels. A powder metallurgy, mechanical blending route has been adopted to produce a homogeneous distribution of TiB2 particles in a 316L stainless steel matrix. The resulting composite showed large increases in both the compression and the tensile strength when compared to the unreinforced alloy. The compression strength was measured under both quasistatic and dynamic conditions. Tensile strength was measured only under quasistatic conditions. Dynamic compression tests were performed at temperatures of 200 and 400 °C. Metallographic investigations have been performed on the specimen in the initial status and after a deformation. Fracture surfaces were studied in a scanning electron microscope to allow more detailed assessment of fracture mechanisms.


Compression Strength Shock Velocity Spall Strength TiB2 Particle Plate Impact 


  1. 1.
    Lach E, Werner E, Bohmann A, Scharf M (2000) Adv Eng Mater 2(11):750–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uggowitzer PJ (1991) In: Speidel MO, Uggowitzer PJ (eds) Ergebnisse der Werkstoff-Forschung, vol 4. Thubal-Kain, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulikoxski Z, Wisbey A, Godfrey TMT, Goodwin PS, Flower HM (2000) Mater Sci Technol 925–928Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hopkinson J (1872) In: Proceedings of the Manchester literary and philosophical society, vol XI. pp 40–45Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lichtenberger A, Gazeaud G, Lach E (1988) In: International conference on mechanical and physical behaviour of materials under dynamic loading. Les Editions de Physique, Les Ulis, pp C3-589–594Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nahme H, Worswick MJ (1994) Dynamic properties and spall plane formation of brass, EURODYMAT 94, Oxford, UK, Sept. 26–30, pp 707–712Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kainer KU (1993) Advanced composites 93. In: Chandra T, Dhingra AK (eds) The minerals, metals & materials society, pp 1213–1219Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Test Recommendation (1999) Dynamic compression testing using the split Hopkinson bar pressure bar. Dymat standardisation––identification n RE/002B/87, 2nd versionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lichtenberger A, Lach E, Bohmann A (1994) J Phys IV 4(8):29–34Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orowan E (1948) Symposium on internal stresses in metals and alloys, Institute of Metals, London, p 451Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    AMC Data, Iron & Steel MMC, Aerospace Metal Composites Limited, FARNBOROUGH, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ernst-Mach-Institute, EMIFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.French-German Research Institute of Saint Louis, ISLSaint LouisFrance
  3. 3.Aerospace Metal Composites Limited, AMCFarnboroughUK

Personalised recommendations