Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 13, pp 5129–5134 | Cite as

Mechanical properties of nanohydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel composites as biomaterial

  • Pan Yusong
  • Xiong DangshengEmail author
  • Chen Xiaolin


Nanohydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel (nano-HA/PVA gel) composites has been proposed as a promising biomaterial, especially used as an articular cartilage repair biomaterial. In this paper, nano-HA/PVA gel composites were prepared from mixing nano-HA particles modified by silicon coupling agent, with physiological saline solution (PSS) of PVA by freezing-thawing method. The effects of various factors on the mechanical properties of nano-HA/PVA gel composites were evaluated. It was shown that the mechanical behavior of nano-HA/PVA gel composites was similar to that of natural articular cartilage, which held special viscoelastic characteristics. The tensile strength and tensile modulus of the composites improved correspondingly with the increase of freezing-thawing times and concentration of PVA solution. The more concentration of PVA solution, the higher influence degree of concentration on the tensile strength of composites is. The tensile strength and tensile modulus of nano-HA/PVA hydrogel composites increased first and then decreased with the rising nano-HA content of the composites. The tensile modulus of the composites improved remarkably with the increase of elongation ratio.


Tensile Strength Articular Cartilage Tensile Modulus Elongation Ratio Interfacial Bonding Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Research is supported by the national natural science foundation of China and by the national high technology research and development program of China.


  1. 1.
    Kobayashi M, Chang YS, Oka M (2005) Biomaterials 26:3243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noguchi T, Yamamuro T, Oka M (1991) Appl Biomater 2(2):101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Covert RJ, Ott RD, Ku DN (2003) Wear 255:1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sawae Y, Murakari T (1996) Trans JSME Part C 62:2343Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suciu AN, Iwatsubo T, Matsuda M (2004) JSME Part C 47(1):199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng QG, Jiu MX, Xiang HZ (1998) Biomed Mater Eng 8(1):75Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stammen JA, Williams S, Ku DN (2001) Biomaterials 22:799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang HY, Liu ZH, Tao F (1997) Clin Neurol Neurosurg 99:20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahn ES, Gleason NJ, Nakahira A (2001) Nano Lett 1(3):149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zheng YD, Wang YJ, Chen XF et al (2005) Chem J Chinese Univ 26(9):1735Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu Q, Joost RW, Clemens AB (1997) Biomaterials 18:1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muta H (2001) Mol Struct (Theochem) 536:219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosa R, Finizia A, Claudio DR (2004) Macromolecules 37:1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nebahat D, Dilhan MK, Elvan B (2006) Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 48:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Material Science & EngineeringNan Jing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations