Skip to main content

Direct assembly process: a novel fabrication technique for large strain ionic polymer transducers

Journal of Materials Science volume 42, pages 7031–7041 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Ionic polymer transducers (IPT) consist of an ion-exchange membrane plated with flexible conductive electrodes on their outer surface. Compared to other types of electromechanical transducers, ionomeric transducers have the advantage of high-strain output (>9%), low-voltage operation (<5 V), and high sensitivity in the charge-sensing mode. A novel fabrication technique for ionic polymer transducers named the Direct Assembly Process (DAP) was developed in this paper. The DAP allows the use of any type of ionomer, diluent, and conducting powder in the transducer, and permits the exploration of any novel ionomeric design. In this paper the effect of diluent content of the IPT, electrode thickness, and composition were optimized in term of maximum peak strain and strain rate generated by an IPT. Decreasing viscosity and increasing polarity and content of the diluent were demonstrated to increase the strain rate of an IPT. The thickness of the electrode was varied and correlated with the maximum strain generated due to a 2 V step input. This study also demonstrated that RuO2 composition has an optimal loading of 42 vol%, while SWNT electrodes have an optimal performance at around 30 vol%.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Shahinpour M, Bar-Cohen Y, Simpson JO, Smith J (1998) Smart Mater Struct 7(6):R15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadeghipour K, Salomon R, Neogi S (1992) Smart Mater Struct 1:3445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oguro K, Kawami Y, Takenaka H (1992) J Micromachine Soc 5:27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akle JB, Bennett M, Leo JD (2006) Sensor Actuat A Phys 126(1):173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim K, Shahinpoor M (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12(1):65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Akle B, Hickner M, Leo D, Mcgrath J (2005) J Mater Sci 40:3715

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nemat-Nasser S (2002) J Appl Phys 92(5):2899

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oguro K, Fujiwara N, Asaka K, Onishi K, Sewa S (1999) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 3669, pp 63–71

  9. Leo D, Farinholt K, Wallmersperger T (2005) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 5759, pp 170–181

  10. Kim K, Shahinpoor M (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:65

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shahinpoor M, Kim K (2002) Sensor Actuat Phys 96:125

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahinpoor M, Kim K (2002) Polymer J 43:797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taegeun N, Yong Suk T, Jae-Do N, Jae Wook J, Hoon Mo K, Hyoukryeol C, Sang Sik B (2001) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 4329, pp 458–465

  14. Akle B (2005) PhD Thesis, Virginia Tech

  15. Akle B, Leo D (2006) Sensor Atuat Phys (in press)

  16. Akle JB, Leo JD. J Intel Mat Syst Str (to appear)

  17. Supriya L, Akle B, Leo D, Claus R (2005) IEEE Sensors J (in press)

  18. Bennett M, Leo D (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:424

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamagawa H, Nogata F, Watanabe T, Abe A, Yagasaki K, Jin JY (2003) J Mater Sci 38:1039

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonhote P, Paula Dias A, Papageorgiou N, Kalyanasundaram K, Gratzel M (1996) Inorg Chem 35:1168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett M, Leo D (2004) Sensor Actuat Phys 115:79

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stauffer D, Aharony A (1992) Introduction to percolation theory, vol 4. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bennett M, Leo D (2005) In: Proceeding of the SPIE smart structures and materials conference, vol 5759, pp 506–517

  24. Endo M, Takeda T, Kim YJ, Koshiba K, Ishii K (2001) Carbon Sci 1:117

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and U.S. Army Research Office under Contract/Grant number DAAD19-02-1-0275 Macromolecular Architecture for Performance (MAP) MURI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Center for Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061-0261, USA

    Barbar J. Akle, Matthew D. Bennett & Donald J. Leo

  2. Department of Chemistry, Macromolecules and Interfaces Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061-0261, USA

    Kenton B. Wiles & James E. McGrath

Authors
  1. Barbar J. Akle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew D. Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald J. Leo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kenton B. Wiles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James E. McGrath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbar J. Akle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akle, B.J., Bennett, M.D., Leo, D.J. et al. Direct assembly process: a novel fabrication technique for large strain ionic polymer transducers. J Mater Sci 42, 7031–7041 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0632-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0632-4

Keywords

  • Ionic Liquid
  • Electric Double Layer
  • Percolation Threshold
  • RuO2
  • LiBH4