Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 18, pp 6046–6055 | Cite as

Preparation of carbon coated ceramic foams by pyrolysis of polyurethane

  • M. Mann
  • G. E. Shter
  • G. S. GraderEmail author


Electronically conducting carbon coatings over alumina foams were prepared by the foams’ impregnation in a polyurethane solution, followed by pyrolysis of the polymer layer. An optimal coating procedure was developed, using a commercial polyurethane lacquer. Pyrolysis was performed by heating the coated foams to 650–1,200 °C in Argon for 2–8 h. Coating characterization included surface area, phase composition, morphological and electrical conductivity measurements. Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) showed the composition was mostly carbon, with trace levels of oxygen impurities. Thickness, microstructure and interface between the alumina foam surface and the carbon film were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM and HR-SEM).

The carbon film’s specific electrical resistivity was 1–10 (Ω m×10−2), depending on the pyrolysis time, temperature and number of coatings. The resistivity was found to decrease by a factor of six when the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 750 to 1,200 °C. A second carbon layer, reduced the resistivity further by about a factor of two. These effects are attributed to densification, improved connectivity between the carbon grains and an overall thickening of the carbon layer. Thermal analysis and Raman measurements on the carbon films point to a grain rearrangement that is consistent with the improved conductivity of the films.


Foam Pyrolysis Polyurethane Carbon Film Carbon Layer 



The investigations were supported by the Technion’s fund for the promotion of research and in part by a joint grant from the Center for Adsorption in Science of the Ministry of Immigrant Absorption State of Israel and the Committee for Planning and Budgeting of the Council for Higher Education under the framework of the KAMEA Program.


  1. 1.
    Kostecki R, Schnyder B, Alliata D, Song X, Kinoshita K, Kotz R (2001) Thin Solid Films 396:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plyuto IV, Shpak AP, Babich IV, Plyuto YV, Sharanda LF, Stoch J, Moulijn JA (1999) Surf Interface Anal 27:911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Inagaki M, Okada Y, Miura H, Konno H (1999) Carbon 37(2):329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inagaki M, Miura H, Konno H, (1998) J Eur Cer Soc 18(8):1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eriksson A, Norekrans AS, Carlsson JO (1992) J Electroanalytical Chem 324(1–2):291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwartzwalder K, Somers A (1963) U. S. Patent 3,090,094Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brockmeyer JW (1986) U.S. Patent No. 4610832Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lubin G (1982) Handbook of composites, Van Nostrand Reinhold Inc., p 215, 757Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dharmasena KP, Wadley HNG (2002) J Mater Res 17(3):625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donnet JB, Voet A (1976) Carbon black, Marcel Dekker, Inc., p 88Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor CA, Chiu WK (2003) Surf Coat Technol 168:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsai H, Bogy DB (1987) J Vac Sci Technol A 6:3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) J Chem Phys 53:1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ko TH, Kuo WS, Chang YH (2000) Polymer Compos 21:745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sichel EK (1982) Carbon black-polymer composites, Marcell Dekker, Inc., p 106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentTechnionHaifa Israel

Personalised recommendations