Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 17, pp 5788–5792 | Cite as

Fractograph–fatigue crack growth kinetics relationship for a fiber reinforced composite

  • Yong X. GanEmail author
  • Heshmat A. Aglan

Fractography is widely used in post-failure analysis to identify fracture origin locations, stress characteristics and service environment. The fracture surface of filled polymer materials often provides clues to the initiation sites of crack, the growth mechanisms and the role of the reinforcement. The technique of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is the most widely used method of studying fracture surface morphology. In addition, other techniques such as optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and acoustic microscopy can provide useful complementary information. The SEM has been increasingly used for quantitative fractography in determination of mechanism of material failure. For polymeric and filled polymeric materials, the SEM serve as the key tool for evaluation of fracture surface features and the determination of failure mechanisms under either monotonic or cyclic tensile loading condition. The advantages of SEM include good depth of field and focus, and...


Fatigue Test Fatigue Crack Growth Fatigue Crack Propagation Damage Zone Crack Speed 



The experimental part of this work was in part sponsored by NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center under contract number NAG10−0168 through Tuskegee University. The technical guidance of P. D. Faughnan and C. Bryan of Materials Science Division, NASA Kennedy Space Center is also acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Cantwell WJ, Roulin-Moloney AC (1989) In: Roulin-Moloney AC (ed) Fractography and failure mechanisms of polymers and composites, Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York, p 241Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lange FF, Radford KC (1971) J Mater Sci 6:1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moloney AC, Kausch HH, Stieger HR (1983) J Mater Sci 18:208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moloney AC, Kausch HH, Stieger HR (1984) J Mater Sci 19:1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Young RJ, Beaumont PWR (1975) J Mater Sci 10:1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cantwell WJ, Roulin-Moloney AC, Kaiser T (1988) J Mater Sci 23:1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Z, Aglan H, Faughnan P, Bryan C (1998) J Reinforced Plastics and Composites 17:752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aglan H, Gan Y, El-Hadik M, Faughnan P, Bryan C (1999) J Mater Sci 34:83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aglan H (1996) NASA Technical Annual Report, NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida, p 10Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aglan H (1997) NASA Technical Annual Report, NASA John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida, p 2Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aglan H (1993) Int J Damage Mech 2:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aglan H, Gan Y (2001) J Mater Sci 36:389CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Albert Nerken School of EngineeringThe Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and ArtNew York CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTuskegee UniversityTuskegeeUSA

Personalised recommendations