Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 252–268

# Geometrical Analysis of Polynomial Lens Distortion Models

• José I. Ronda
• Antonio Valdés
Article

## Abstract

Polynomial functions are a usual choice to model the nonlinearity of lenses. Typically, these models are obtained through physical analysis of the lens system or on purely empirical grounds. The aim of this work is to facilitate an alternative approach to the selection or design of these models based on establishing a priori the desired geometrical properties of the distortion functions. With this purpose we obtain all the possible isotropic linear models and also those that are formed by functions with symmetry with respect to some axis. In this way, the classical models (decentering, thin prism distortion) are found to be particular instances of the family of models found by geometric considerations. These results allow to find generalizations of the most usually employed models while preserving the desired geometrical properties. Our results also provide a better understanding of the geometric properties of the models employed in the most usual computer vision software libraries.

## Keywords

Lens distortion Camera calibration Polynomial model

51 78

## References

1. 1.
Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
2. 2.
Hartley, R., Kang, S.B.: Parameter-free radial distortion correction with center of distortion estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29, 1309–1321 (2007)
3. 3.
Ricolfe-Viala, C., Sánchez-Salmerón, A.-J.: Correcting non-linear lens distortion in cameras without using a model. Opt. Laser Technol. 42, 628–639 (2010)
4. 4.
Claus, D., Fitzgibbon, A.W.: A rational function lens distortion model for general cameras. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), vol. 1, pp. 213–219 (2005)Google Scholar
5. 5.
Weng, J., Cohen, P., Herniou, M., et al.: Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 965–980 (1992)
6. 6.
Li, H., Hartley, R.: A non-iterative method for correcting lens distortion from nine point correspondences. OMNIVIS 2, 7 (2005)Google Scholar
7. 7.
Álvarez, L., Gómez, L., Sendra, J.R.: An algebraic approach to lens distortion by line rectification. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 35, 36–50 (2009)
8. 8.
Strand, R., Hayman, E.: Correcting radial distortion by circle fitting. In: BMVC (2005)Google Scholar
9. 9.
Wu, F., Wei, H., Wang, X.: Correction of image radial distortion based on division model. Opt. Eng. 56, 013108 (2017)
10. 10.
Devernay, F., Faugeras, O.: Straight lines have to be straight. Mach. Vis. Appl. 13, 14–24 (2001)
11. 11.
Ma, W., Liu, Y.: A curve-fitting method for correcting radial distortion. In: Image and Signal Processing, CISP’09. 2nd International Congress on IEEE, pp. 1–4 (2009)Google Scholar
12. 12.
Conrady, A.: Lens-systems, decentered. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 79, 384–390 (1919)
13. 13.
Brown, D.C.: Decentering distortion of lenses. Photogramm. Eng. 32, 444–462 (1966)Google Scholar
14. 14.
Tang, Z., von Gioi, R.G., Monasse, P., Morel, J.-M.: A precision analysis of camera distortion models. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 2694–2704 (2017)
15. 15.
Bradski, G.: The opencv library. Dr. Dobb’s. J. Softw. Tools. 25, 120, 122–125 (2000)Google Scholar
16. 16.
Vinberg, E.B.: Linear Representations of Groups. Birkhäuser (2012)Google Scholar
17. 17.
Matlab computer vision toolbox: The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA (2017)Google Scholar