Advertisement

Journal of Logic, Language and Information

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 233–265 | Cite as

Comparison Across Domains in Delineation Semantics

  • Heather Burnett
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a new logical analysis of quantity comparatives (i.e. More linguists than philosophers came to the party.) within the Delineation Semantics approach to gradability and comparison (McConnell-Ginet in Comparison constructions in English. PhD thesis, University of Rochester, Rochester, 1973; Kamp in Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975; Klein in Linguist Philos 4:1–45, 1980) among many others. Along with the Degree Semantics framework (Cresswell in Montague grammar. Academic Press, New York, 1976; von Stechow in J Semant 3:1–77, 1984; Kennedy in Projecting the adjective. PhD thesis. University of California, Santa Cruz, 1997, among many others) Delineation Semantics is one of the dominant logical frameworks for analyzing the meaning of gradable constituents of the adjectival syntactic category; however, there has been very little work done investigating the application of this framework to the analysis of gradability outside the adjectival domain. This state of affairs distinguishes the Delineation Semantics framework from its Degree Semantics counterpart, where such questions have been investigated in great deal since the beginning of the twenty-first century. Nevertheless, it has been observed [for example, by Doetjes (Seventeenth amsterdam colloquium. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2011); van Rooij (The vagueness handbook. Springer, Dordrecht, 2011c)] that there is nothing inherently adjectival about the way that the interpretations of scalar predicates are calculated in Delineation Semantics, and therefore that there is enormous potential for this approach to shed light on the nature of gradability and comparison in the nominal and verbal domains. This paper is a first contribution to realizing this potential within a Mereological extension of a simple version of the DelS system.

Keywords

Delineation semantics Mereology Comparatives  Plurality 

References

  1. Bale, A. (2008). A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2009). The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26, 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartsch, R., & Vennemann, T. (1972). Semantic structures: A study in the relation between semantics and syntax. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaum.Google Scholar
  4. Barwise, J., & Cooper, R. (1981). Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, S., Krasikova, S., Fleischer, D., Gergel, R., Hofstetter, S., Savelsberg, C., et al. (2009). Crosslinguistic variation in comparative constructions. In J. van Craenenbroeck & J. Rooryck (Eds.), Linguistic variation yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 1–66). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  6. Bhatt, R., & Pancheva, R. (2004). Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bierwisch, M. (1989). The semantics of gradation. In M. Bierwisch & E. Lang (Eds.), Dimensional adjectives (pp. 71–261). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bobaljik, J. (2012). Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bochnak, R. (2013). Crosslinguistic variation in the semantics of comparatives. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Borer, H. (2005). Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bresnan, J. (1973). Syntax of the comparative clause in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 275–343.Google Scholar
  12. Büring, D. (2007). Cross-polar nomalies. In UConn (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT17 (pp. 1–16). Storrs: University of Conneticut.Google Scholar
  13. Caudal, P., & Nicolas, D. (2005). Types of degrees and types of event structures. In C. Maienborn & A. Wöllstein (Eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  14. Chierchia, G. (2010). Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174, 99–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cresswell, M. (1976). The semantics of degree. In B. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp. 261–292). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Doetjes, J. (1997). Quantifiers and selection. PhD thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  18. Doetjes, J. (2011). Incommensurability. In M. Aloni, H. Bastiaanse, T. de Jager, P. van Ormondt, & K. Schulz (Eds.), Seventeenth amsterdam colloquium. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  19. Dowty, D., Wall, R., & Peters, S. (1987). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, M. (2013). The parsing and interpretation of comparatives: More than meets the eye. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  21. Hackl, M. (2001). Comparative quantifiers. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  22. Hackl, M. (2009). On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: Most versus more than half. Natural Language Semantics, 17, 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “number sense”: The approximate number system in 3-,4-,5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Higginbotham, J. (1994). Mass and count quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, 447–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hovda, P. (2008). What is classical mereology? Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamp, H. (1975). Two theories about adjectives. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Keenan, E., & Stavi, J. (1986). A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 253–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy, C. (1997). Projecting the adjective. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, C. (2007). Vagueness and grammar: The study of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kennedy, C. (2011). Vagueness and comparison. In P. Égré & N. Klinedinst (Eds.), Vagueness and language use (pp. 1–24). Palgrave: Palgrave Press.Google Scholar
  32. Klein, E. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein, E. (1991). Comparatives. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 673–691). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal reference, temporal constitution and thematic relations. In A. Szabolcsi & I. Sag (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass nouns: A lattice-theoretic approach. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwartze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and the interpretation of language (pp. 302–322). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  36. Luce, R. (1956). Semi-orders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McConnell-Ginet, S. (1973). Comparison constructions in english. PhD thesis, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  38. Morzycki, M. (2009). Degree modification of gradable nouns: size adjectives and adnominal degree morphemes. Natural Language Semantics, 17, 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morzycki, M. (in press) Modification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nakanishi, K. (2007). Measurement in the nominal and verbal domains. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 235–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Odic, D., Pietroski, P., Hunter, T., Lidz, J., & Halberda, J. (2013). Children’s understanding of “more” and discrimination of number and surface area. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 451–461.Google Scholar
  42. Pietrosky, P., Lidz, J., Hunter, T., & Halberda, J. (2009). The meaning of ‘most’: Semantics numerosity and psychology. Mind and Language, 24, 554–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rett, J. (2007). How many maximizes in the Balkan Sprachbund. In M. Gibson & J. Howell (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT XVI. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  45. Rett, J. (2008). Degree modification in natural language. PhD thesis, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  46. Rett, J. (2014). The polysemy of measurement. Lingua, 143, 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sapir, E. (1944). Grading. A study in semantics. Philosophy of Science, 11, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwarzschild, R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII (pp. 225–245). Ithaca NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  49. Schwarzschild, R. (2006). The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases. Syntax, 9, 67–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Solt, S. (2014). Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics, 31, 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Benthem, J. (1982). Later than late: On the logical origin of the temporal order. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 63, 193–203.Google Scholar
  52. van Rooij, R. (2011a). Implicit vs explicit comparatives. In P. Égré & N. Klinedinst (Eds.), Vagueness and Language Use. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. van Rooij, R. (2011b). Measurement and interadjective comparisons. Journal of Semantics, 28, 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Rooij, R. (2011c). Vagueness and linguistics. In G. Ronzitti (Ed.), The vagueness handbook. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. von Stechow, A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of semantics, 3, 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wellwood, A. (2014). Measuring predicates. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  57. Wellwood, A., Hacquard, V., & Pancheva, R. (2012). Measuring and comparing individuals and events. Journal of Semantics, 29, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wellwood, A., Halberda, J., Hunter, T., Odic, D., Pietroski, P., & Lidz, J. (2013). Meaning more or most: evidence from 3-and-a-half year-olds. In: Pham M (ed) Proceedings of the 48th meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS/CLLE-ERSS/Institut Jean NicodUniversité de Toulouse 2/ENSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations