Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Asymmetrical Difficulty of Acquiring Person Reference in French: Production Versus Comprehension

Journal of Logic, Language and Information volume 21, pages 7–30 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Young French children freely produce subject pronouns by the age of 2. However, by age 2 and a half they fail to interpret 3rd person pronouns in an experimental setting designed to select a referent among three participants (speaker, hearer, and other). No such problems are found with 1st and 2nd person pronouns. We formalize our analysis of these empirical results in terms of direction-sensitive optimizations, showing that uni-directionality of optimization, when combined with non-adult-like constraint rankings, explains the general acquisition pattern of 3rd person pronouns. Building on a specific analysis of assigning 3rd person reference by computing over alternatives (Heim 1991), we show that adult interpretation does not require bidirectional OT although it is fully compatible with it. What matters for comprehension in the domain investigated here is constraint ranking.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Blutner R. (2000) Some apects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17: 189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brener R. (1983) Learning the deictic meaning of third person pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 12(3): 235–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien Y.-C., Wexler K. (1990) Children’s knowledge of locality conditions on binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 13: 225–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M-T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In BU proceedings (pp. 157–168).

  • Clark, E. V. (1998). Lexique et syntaxe dans l’acquisition du français. In C. Martinot (Ed.), Special issue of Langue Française: l’acquisition du français langue maternelle (Vol. 118, pp. 49–60).

  • Conroy A., Takahashi E., Lidz J., Phillips C. (2009) Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 446–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson J. (2010) Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: From subject clitic to agreement marker. Language 86: 85–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hoop, H. & Krämer, I. (2005/2006). Children’s optimal interpretations of indefinite subjects and objects. Language Acquisition, 13, 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., Pethick, S., & Reilly, J. S. (1993). The MacArthur communicative development inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.

  • Girouard P. C., Ricard M., Gouin Decarie T. (1997) The acquisition of personal pronouns in French-speaking and English-speaking children. Journal of Child Language 24: 311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann C., Rizzi L., Frauenfelder U. (1996) The acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In: Clahsen H. (eds) Generative perspectives on language acquisition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 309–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1991) Artikel und Definitheit. In: Von Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenoessischen Forschung. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 487–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, P., de Hoop, H., & Lamers, M. (2005). Asymmetries in language use reveal asymmetries in the grammar. In Proceedings of the 15th Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 113–118).

  • Hendriks, P., Spenader, J. (2005/6). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13, 319–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks P., Hoop H., Krämer I., de Swart H., Swarts J. (2010) Conflicts in interpretation. Equinox Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger G. (2002) Some notes on the formal properties of bidirectional optimality theory. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 11(4): 427–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowicz C., Rigaut C. (1997) L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs en français. In: Zribi- Hertz A. (eds) Les pronoms: Morphologie, syntaxe, et typologie. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, Paris, pp 57–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen O. (1924) The philosophy of grammar. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser G. (1994) More about INFL-ection and agreement: The acquisition of clitic pronouns in French. In: Meisel J. (eds) Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 131–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern S. (2003) Le compte-rendu parental au service de l’évaluation de la production lexicale des enfants français entre 16 et 30 mois. Glossa 85: 48–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre G., Hagstrom P., Vainikka A., Todorova M. (2002) Partial constraint ordering in child French syntax. Language Acquisition 10: 189–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre G., Hagstrom P., Chen-Main J., Tao L., Smolensky P. (2004) Deriving output probabilities in child Mandarin from a Dual-Optimization grammar. Lingua 114/9-10: 1147–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre G., Barrière I., Goyet L., Nazzi T. (2010) Comprehension of infrequent subject–verb agreement forms: Evidence from French-learning children. Child Development 81(6): 1859–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, G., Barrière I., Goyet L., & Nazzi, T. (2011). On the acquisition of implicated presuppositions: Evidence from French personal pronouns. Selected papers from GALANA 2010 (in press).

  • Legerstee M., Feider H. (1986) The acquisition of person pronouns in French-speaking children. International Journal of Psychology 21: 629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Noveck I. (2001) When children are more logical than adults. Cognition 78: 165–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou A., Musolino J. (2003) Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the syntax-semantics interface. Cognition 86: 253–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce A. (1992) Language acquisition and syntactic theory: A comparative analysis of French and English child grammars. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Technical report, Linguistics Department, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder. Rutgers Optimality Archive 537.

  • Sauerland U. (2008) On the semantic markedness of phi-features. In: Harbour D., Adger D., Bejar S. (eds) Phi-theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer J., Matthewson L. (2005) Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 53–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky P. (1996) On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 720–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatsushiro, K. (2008). German determiner presuppositions in first language acquisition. In H. Chan, H. Jacob & E. Kapia (Eds.), Proceedings supplement of BUCLD (Vol. 32).

  • Zeevat H. (2000) The asymmetry of optimality theoretic syntax and semantics. Journal of Semantics 17: 243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Géraldine Legendre & Paul Smolensky

Authors
  1. Géraldine Legendre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Smolensky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Géraldine Legendre.

Additional information

Thanks to: Isabelle Barrière/Brooklyn College, Thierry Nazzi and Louise Goyet/LPP Paris Descartes, and Jenny Culbertson and Mónica López-González/JHU for their participation in the experimental study reported here; Emmanuel Chemla/LSCP/Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris, Philippe Schlenker and Benjamin Spector/Institut Jean Nicod, Paris for sharing their semantics/pragmatics expertise; the 2010 GALANA audience; the audience at the 2009 KNAW conference in Amsterdam, in particular Henk Zeevat; the audience at the 2010 Tandem Workshop in Berlin, in particular Uli Sauerland; and two anonymous reviewers, as well as the guest editors, Petra Hendriks, Helen de Hoop, and Henriëtte de Swart. Last but not least, we thank for their financial support the NSF (grant #0446954 to GL) and a Chaire Internationale de Recherche Blaise Pascal, l’Etat et la Région d’Ile-de-France (PS).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Legendre, G., Smolensky, P. On the Asymmetrical Difficulty of Acquiring Person Reference in French: Production Versus Comprehension. J of Log Lang and Inf 21, 7–30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9150-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-011-9150-0

Keywords

search

Navigation