Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mission Capability Estimation of Multicopter UAV for Low-Altitude Remote Sensing

Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Restricted mission capability becomes one of the most important challenges facing multicopter UAVs with the increasing complexity of the low-altitude remote sensing mission. Mission capability estimation is the major precondition and the foundation of the mission planning, decomposition, and execution. It’s constrained by platform performance, payload characteristics, mission requirements, and environmental conditions. Flight energy consumption has become the main capability metric criterion of multicopter UAVs in coverage path planning based remote sensing missions. Modeling on flight energy consumption has been the principal subject of many pieces of research. However, current models have not established a connection between inflight performance and remote sensing mission characteristics. Therefore, a mechanistic model is proposed in this study to estimate a multicopter UAV’s mission capability during the mission planning procedure. This model is based on the combination of multicopter flight mechanics and remote sensing mission-oriented coverage path planning theories. The field wind condition is taken into consideration as well. The applicability and performance of the model were evaluated by combining simulation and 60 field mission sorties. The model estimated results are in accordance with the true values. The mean error in the total energy consumption is 5% of the battery used in the experiment. This model will ultimately provide a theoretical basis for mission decision making, help to reduce the low-battery risk and guarantee the safety and efficiency of mission operations prior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Manfreda, S., et al.: On the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Environmental Monitoring. Remote Sens. 10(4) (2018)

  2. Hoffer, N.V., Coopmans, C., Jensen, A.M., Chen, Y.Q.: A survey and categorization of small low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle system identification. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 74(1–2), 129–145 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim, H., Park, J., Lee, D., Kim, H.J.: Build your own Quadrotor open-source projects on unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(3), 33–45 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, K.K., Frazier, A.E.: A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery for terrestrial applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39(15–16), 5078–5098 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yao, H., R. Qin, and X. Chen: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Remote Sensing Applications—A Review. Remote Sens., 11(12)2019.

  6. Adler, B., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.: Autonomous exploration of urban environments using unmanned aerial vehicles. J. Field Robot. 31(6), 912–939 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandino, J., et al., Aerial Mapping of Forests Affected by Pathogens Using UAVs, Hyperspectral Sensors, and Artificial Intelligence. Sens., 2018. 18(4)

  8. Honkavaara, E., Eskelinen, M.A., Polonen, I., Saari, H., Ojanen, H., Mannila, R., Holmlund, C., Hakala, T., Litkey, P., Rosnell, T., Viljanen, N., Pulkkanen, M.: Remote sensing of 3-D geometry and surface moisture of a peat production area using Hyperspectral frame cameras in visible to short-wave infrared spectral ranges onboard a small unmanned airborne vehicle (UAV). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54(9), 5440–5454 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qi, J.T., et al.: Search and rescue rotary-wing UAV and its application to the Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake. J. Field Robot. 33(3), 290–321 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Floreano, D., Wood, R.J.: Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature. 521(7553), 460–466 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shakhatreh, H., Sawalmeh, A.H., al-Fuqaha, A., Dou, Z., Almaita, E., Khalil, I., Othman, N.S., Khreishah, A., Guizani, M.: Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): a survey on civil applications and key research challenges. Ieee Access. 7, 48572–48634 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghamisi, P., Gloaguen, R., Atkinson, P.M., Benediktsson, J.A., Rasti, B., Yokoya, N., Wang, Q., Hofle, B., Bruzzone, L., Bovolo, F., Chi, M., Anders, K.: Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing a comprehensive review of the state of the art. Ieee Geosci. Remote Sensing Mag. 7(1), 6–39 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Besada, J.A., et al., Drone Mission Definition and Implementation for Automated Infrastructure Inspection Using Airborne Sensors. Sens., 2018. 18(4)

  14. Gortney, W.E. Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. 2016

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cabreira, T.M., Brisolara, L.B., Ferreira Jr., P.R.: Survey on coverage path planning with unmanned aerial vehicles. Drones. 3(1), 4 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sofonia, J.J., Phinn, S., Roelfsema, C., Kendoul, F., Rist, Y.: Modelling the effects of fundamental UAV flight parameters on LiDAR point clouds to facilitate objectives-based planning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 149, 105–118 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tu, Y.-H., Phinn, S., Johansen, K., Robson, A., Wu, D.: Optimising drone flight planning for measuring horticultural tree crop structure. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 160, 83–96 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dandois, J., Olano, M., Ellis, E.: Optimal altitude, overlap, and weather conditions for computer vision UAV estimates of Forest structure. Remote Sens. 7(10), 13895–13920 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesas-Carrascosa, F.J., Torres-Sánchez, J., Clavero-Rumbao, I., García-Ferrer, A., Peña, J.M., Borra-Serrano, I., López-Granados, F.: Assessing optimal flight parameters for generating accurate multispectral Orthomosaicks by UAV to support site-specific crop management. Remote Sens. 7(10), 12793–12814 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roth, L., Hund, A., Aasen, H.: PhenoFly Planning Tool flight planning for high-resolution optical remote sensing with unmanned areal systems. Plant Methods. 14, 116 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdilla, A., A. Richards, and S. Burrow, Power and Endurance Modelling of Battery-Powered Rotorcraft. 2015 Ieee/Rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Iros), 2015: p. 675–680

  22. Chang, K., et al.: LiPo battery energy studies for improved flight performance of unmanned aerial Systems. Unman. Syst. Technol. Xviii, 9837 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Podhradsky, M., Coopmans, C., Jensen, A.: Battery state-of-charge based altitude controller for small, low cost multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 74(1–2), 193–207 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karydis, K., Kumar, V.: Energetics in robotic flight at small scales. Interf. Foc. 7(1), 20160088 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Coops, N.C., Goodbody, T.R.H., Cao, L.: Four steps to extend drone use in research. Nature. 572(7770), 433–435 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ten Harmsel, A.J., Olson, I.J., Atkins, E.M.: Emergency flight planning for an energy-constrained multicopter. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 85(1), 145–165 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Debbah, M.: Mobile unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for energy-efficient internet of things communications. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 16(11), 7574–7589 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baek, D., et al. Battery-Aware Energy Model of Drone Delivery Tasks. in ISLPED. 2018

  29. Abeywickrama, H.V., Jayawickrama, B.A., He, Y., Dutkiewicz, E.: Comprehensive energy consumption model for unmanned aerial vehicles, based on empirical studies of battery performance. Ieee Acc. 6, 58383–58394 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Prasetia, A.S., Wai, R.J., Wen, Y.L., Wang, Y.K.: Mission-based energy consumption prediction of multirotor UAV. Ieee Acc. 7, 33055–33063 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Q, Q., Modeling and Evaluation of Propulsion System. In: Introduction to Multicopter Design and Control. 2017: Springer, Singapore

  32. Bershadsky, D., S. Haviland, and E.N. Johnson, Electric Multirotor UAV Propulsion System Sizing for Performance Prediction and Design Optimization, in 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 2016: San Diego, California, USA

  33. Gatti, M.: Complete Preliminary Design Methodology for Electric Multirotor. J. Aerosp. Eng., 30(5)2017.

  34. Tekinalp, O., et al., Propulsion System Selection and Modeling for a Quadrotor with Search and Rescue Mission. 2016

  35. Baek, D., Chen, Y., Bocca, A., Bottaccioli, L., Cataldo, S.D., Gatteschi, V., Pagliari, D.J., Patti, E., Urgese, G., Chang, N., Macii, A., Macii, E., Montuschi, P., Poncino, M.: Battery-aware operation range estimation for terrestrial and aerial electric vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68(6), 5471–5482 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Franco, C., Buttazzo, G.: Coverage path planning for UAVs photogrammetry with energy and resolution constraints. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 83(3–4), 445–462 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cabreira, T.M., Franco, C.D., Ferreira, P.R., Buttazzo, G.C.: Energy-aware spiral coverage path planning for UAV photogrammetric applications. Ieee Robot. Autom. Lett. 3(4), 3662–3668 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sieberth, T., Wackrow, R., Chandler, J.H.: Automatic detection of blurred images in UAV image sets. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 122, 1–16 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wierzbicki, D.: Multi-Camera Imaging System for UAV Photogrammetry. Sens., 18(8)2018.

  40. Gruszczynski, W., Matwij, W., Cwiakala, P.: Comparison of low-altitude UAV photogrammetry with terrestrial laser scanning as data-source methods for terrain covered in low vegetation. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 126, 168–179 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liu, C., A. Akbar, and H.B. Wu, Dynamic Model Constrained Optimal Flight Speed Determination of Surveying UAV Under Wind Condition. 2018 26th International Conference on Geoinformatics (Geoinformatics 2018), 2018

  42. Jung, W., Lim, S., Lee, D., Bang, H.: Unmanned aircraft vector field path following with arrival angle control. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 84(1–4), 311–325 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bangura, M., Mahony, R.: Thrust control for multirotor aerial vehicles. IEEE Trans. Robot. 33(2), 390–405 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rodriguez, L., et al.: Energy-Efficient Trajectory Generation with Spline Curves Considering Environmental and Dynamic Constraints for Small UAS. 2017 Ieee/Rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Iros), 1739-1745 2017

  45. Coombes, M., et al., Optimal Polygon Decomposition for UAV Survey Coverage Path Planning in Wind. Sens., 18(7) 2018

  46. Sharifi, A. and H. Nobahari, Multiple Model Filters Applied to Wind Model Estimation for a Fixed Wing UAV. Proceedings of 2016 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, (Icmae), 109–115 2016

  47. Saha, B., et al., Battery health management system for electric UAVs, in 2011 Aerospace Conference. p. 1–9 2011

  48. Orsag, M., et al.: Springer. Cham. p. 33–85 (2018)

  49. Heier, S., Wind Energy Conversion Systems, in Grid Integration of Wind Energy. 2014, John Wiley & Sons. p. 31-117

  50. de Sousa Barros, J., Oliveira Freitas, T., Nigam, V., V. Brito, A.: Analysis of design strategies for unmanned aerial vehicles using co-simulation. Des. Autom. Embed. Syst. 21, 157–172 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Shanghai Tongfan Surveying Engineering and Technology Co., Ltd., for their technical support regarding the UAV and flight data collection.

Funding

This research is supported and funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFB0502102) and (Grant No. 2018YFB1305003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akram Akbar.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Akbar, A., Wu, H. et al. Mission Capability Estimation of Multicopter UAV for Low-Altitude Remote Sensing. J Intell Robot Syst 100, 667–688 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01199-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-020-01199-9

Keywords

Navigation