Advertisement

An Experimental Analysis on Propeller Performance in a Climate-controlled Facility

  • Matteo ScanavinoEmail author
  • Andrea Vilardi
  • Giorgio Guglieri
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Despite many commercial applications make extensive use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), there is still lack of published data about their performance under unconventional weather conditions. In the last years, multirotors and fixed wing vehicles, commonly referred to as drones, have been studied in wind environments so that stability and controllability have been improved. However, other important weather variables have impact on UAS performance and they should be properly investigated for a deeper understanding of such vehicles. The primary objective of our study is the preliminary characterization of a propeller in a climate-controlled chamber. Mechanical and electrical data have been measured while testing the propeller at low pressure and cold temperatures. Test results point out that thrust and electric power are strongly affected by air density. A comparison between the experimental data and the results of the Blade Element Theory is carried out to assess the theory capability to estimate thrust in unconventional environments. The overlap between experimental data and theory computation is appropriate despite geometrical uncertainties and corroborate the need of a reliable aerodynamic database. Propeller performance data under unconventional atmospheres will be leveraged to improve UAS design, propulsion system modelling as well as provide guidelines to certify operations in extreme environments.

Keywords

Propeller performance Unmanned aircraft system test bench Harsh environmental coditions Blade element theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Regional Development Fund 2014-2020 of , under Grant Agreement 2223/2017/Project number FESR1048, Creazione di un servizio di sviluppo tecnico per droni testati per il funzionamento in condizioni ambientali estreme, DronEx.

References

  1. 1.
    Blade element theory for propeller. http://www.aerodynamics4students.com/propulsion/blade-element-propeller-theory.php. Accessed: 2019-07-12
  2. 2.
    Precisionhawk explores extreme-weather testing of drones with ace research centre. https://www.precisionhawk.com/blog/media/topic/precisionhawk-explores-extreme-weather-testing-of-drones-with-ace-research-centre. Accessed: 2019-07-26
  3. 3.
    Series 1520 thrust stand - rcbenchmark. https://www.rcbenchmark.com/pages/series-1520. Accessed: 2019-07-26
  4. 4.
    terraxcube. https://terraxcube.eurac.edu/. Accessed: 2019-07-26
  5. 5.
    U5 t-motor propulsion system specifications. http://store-en.tmotor.com/goods.php?id=318. Accessed: 2019-07-09
  6. 6.
    Brandt, J., Selig, M.: Propeller Performance Data at Low Reynolds Numbers. In: 49Th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p. 1255 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FreeflySystem: Alta 8 Aircraft Fligth ManualGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guglieri, G.: Effect of autopilot modes on flight performances of electric mini-uavs. Aeronaut. J 117(1187), 57–69 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Houghton, E.L., Carpenter, P.W.: Aerodynamics for engineering students. Elsevier (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, Y., Li, L., Chen, W., Tian, W., Hu, H.: An experimental study on the aerodynamic performance degradation of a uas propeller model induced by ice accretion process. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 102, 101–112 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, Y., Li, L., Li, H., Hu, H.: An experimental study of surface wettability effects on dynamic ice accretion process over an uas propeller model. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 73, 164–172 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, Y., Li, L., Ning, Z., Tian, W., Hu, H.: Experimental investigation on the dynamic icing process over a rotating propeller model. J. Propuls. Power 34(4), 933–946 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Navarathinam, N., Lee, R., Chesser, H.: Characterization of lithium-polymer batteries for cubesat applications. Acta Astronaut. 68(11-12), 1752–1760 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Russell, C.R., Jung, J., Willink, G., Glasner, B.: Wind tunnel and hover performance test results for multicopter uas vehicles (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wild, G., Murray, J., Baxter, G.: Exploring civil drone accidents and incidents to help prevent potential air disasters. Aerospace 3(3), 22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.terraXcube, Eurac ResearchBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations