Advertisement

Exploring the Effect of Obscurants on Safe Landing Zone Identification

  • Keith W. Sevcik
  • Noah Kuntz
  • Paul Y. OhEmail author
Article

Abstract

Manned rotorcraft are often employed in harsh environments and difficult terrain that are inaccessible to other craft. Conversely, robotic rotorcraft are operated in controlled settings, often at safe, high altitudes. Missions such as cargo delivery, medevac and fire fighting are unachievable because of unpredictable adverse environmental conditions. To enable UAVs to perform these missions, the effects of obscurants on UAV sensor suites and algorithms must be clearly understood. This paper explores the use of a laser range finder to accomplish landing zone identification in unknown, unstructured environments. The ability to detect a landing zone in environments obscured by smoke is investigated. This is accomplished using a design methodology of testing and evaluating in a controlled environment followed by verification and validation in the field. This methodology establishes a concrete understanding of the sensor performance, thereby removing ambiguities in field tests.

Keywords

Evaluating guidance algorithms Verifying performance Navigation and control 

References

  1. 1.
    Dimmeler, A., Clement, D., Biichtemann, W.: Effects of obscurants on the performance of laser range finders. Technical Report 6, FGAN–FfO, Tubingen, Germany (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brinkworth, B.: Calculation of attenuation and back-scattering in cloud and fog. Atmos. Environ. 5(8), 605–611 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arshinov, Y.F., Donchenko, V.A., Zuev, V.E., Kostin1, V.V., Samokhvalov, I.V.: Experimental investigation of attenuation and backscatter of laser radiation at lambda=2.36 mu and lambda=0.63 mu by artificial fogs and smokes. Russ. Phys. J. 16(6), 789–793 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thrun, S., Diel, M., Hahnel, D.: Scan alignment and 3-d surface modeling with a helicopter platform. In: The 4th Int. Conf. on Field and Service Robotics, pp. 14–16 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scherer, S., Singh, S., Chamberlain, L., Saripalli, S.: Flying fast and low among obstacles. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2023–2029 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saripalli, S., Montgomery, J., Sukhatme, G.: Vision-based autonomous landing of an unmanned aerial vehicle. In: Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2799–2804 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saripalli, S., Sukhatme, G.: Landing on a moving target using an autonomous helicopter. In: Int. Conf. on Field and Service Robotics (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, A., Montgomery, J., Matthies, L.: Vision guided landing of an autonomous helicopter in hazardous terrain. In: Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3966–3971 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meingast, M., Geyer, C., Sastry, S.: Vision based terrain recovery for landing unmanned aerial vehicles. In: IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 1670–1675 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, A., Klumpp, A., Collier, J., Wolf, A.: LIDAR-based hazard avoidance for safe landing on Mars. AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn. 25(6), 1091–1099 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Narli, V., Oh, P.: A hardware-in-the-loop test rig for designing near-earth aerial robotics. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2509–2514 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sevcik, K.W., Oh, P.Y.: Designing aerial robot sensor suites to account for obscurants. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1582–1587 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Dahlkamp, H., Stavens, D., Aron, A., Diebel, J., Fong, P., Gale, J., Halpenny, M., Hoffmann, G., Lau, K., Oakley, C., Palatucci, M., Pratt, V., Stang, P., Strohband, S., Dupont, C., Jendrossek, L.-E., Koelen, C., Markey, C., Rummel, C., van Niekerk, J., Jensen, E., Alessandrini, P., Bradski, G., Davies, B., Ettinger, S., Kaehler, A., Nefian, A., Mahoney, P.: Stanley, the robot that won the darpa grand challenge. Journal of Field Robotics 23(9), 661–692 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Urmson, C., Ragusa, C., Ray, D., Anhalt, J., Bartz, D., Galatali, T., Gutierrez, A., Johnston, J., Harbaugh, S., Kato, H., Messner, W., Miller, N., Peterson, K., Smith, B., Snider, J., Spiker, S., Ziglar, J., Whittaker, W., Clark, M., Koon, P., Mosher, A., Struble, J.: A robust approach to high-speed navigation for unrehearsed desert terrain. Journal of Field Robotics 23(8), 467–508 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Research, development, test and evaluation of materiel for extreme climatic conditions. Army Regulation, pp. 70–38 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and MechanicsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations