Skip to main content
Log in

Methodology for complexity and cost comparison between subtractive and additive manufacturing processes

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This works presents a methodology, along with its software implementation called “Design 2 Cost”, for evaluating the manufacturing cost and complexity of a part built by a subtractive (e.g. milling) or additive (e.g. laser metal deposition, Selective laser melting, wire-arc additive manufacturing) process. The overall manufacturing complexity is calculated as a weighted average of morphological and material criteria, which are defined either locally or globally. The local morphological criteria are calculated over the leaf nodes of an octree representation of the part using a raycasting technique. This allows to efficiently probe the local geometry of the part and compare it with manufacturing constraints emanating from the manufacturing process and its associated effector. This algorithm yields a cartography of the local complexity criteria that helps visualizing the problematic regions for the processes under consideration. The software is accompanied by a database that feeds the required material and process properties needed for the calculation of the manufacturing complexity and cost. The proposed methodology therefore permits a technical and economic comparison of manufacturing processes for a given geometry and material, as well as a comparison of various part geometries and materials for a given manufacturing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almaghariz, E. S., Conner, B. P., Lenner, L., Gullapalli, R., Manogharan, G. P., & Lamoncha, B. (2016). Quantifying the role of part design complexity in using 3D printing for molds and cores. International Journal of Metalcasting, 10, 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busachi, A., Erkoyuncu, J., Colegrove, P., Martina, F., Watts, C., and Drake, R. (2017). A review of additive manufacturing technology and cost estimation techniques for the defence sector. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 19, 117–128.

  • Giachetti, R. E. (1998). A decision support system for material and manufacturing process selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9(3), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hascoët, J.-Y., Touzé, S., & Rauch, M. (2018). Automated identification of defect geometry for metallic part repair by an additive manufacturing process. Welding in the World, 62(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentz, J. B., Nguyen, V. K., Maeder, W., Panarese, D., & Gunnink, J. W. (2013). An enabling digital foundation towards smart machining. Procedia CIRP, 12, 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., Xiong, Y., Zhang, Z., & Rosen, D. W. (2022). Machine learning integrated design for additive manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 33(4), 1073–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonata, L., de Araujo, P., Ozcan, E., Atkin, J., & Baumers, M. (2016). A part complexity measurement method supporting 3D Printing A part complexity measurement method supporting 3D Printing. (January).

  • Kerbrat, O. (2009). “Méthodologie de conception d’outillages modulaires hybrides basée sur l’évaluation quantitative de la complexité de fabrication.” PhD thesis, ENS Cachan.

  • Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P., & Hasco, J. (2015). A novel methodology of design for additive manufacturing applied to additive laser manufacturing process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 30, 389–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P., & Hascoet, J.-Y. (2010a). Manufacturability analysis to combine additive and subtractive processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 16(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P., & Hascoet, J. Y. (2010b). Manufacturing complexity evaluation at the design stage for both machining and layered manufacturing. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3), 208–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P., & Hascoët, J. Y. (2011). A new DFM approach to combine machining and additive manufacturing. Computers in Industry, 62(7), 684–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korosec, M., Balic, J., & Kopac, J. (2005). Neural network based manufacturability evaluation of free form machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczyk, T., Malinowski, T., Moldovan, L., Fuwen, H., Paczkowski, T., & Ciobanu, I. (2019). CAD CAM system for manufacturing innovative hybrid design using 3D printing. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, P., Mognol, P., & Hascoet, J. Y. (2013). Modeling and control of a direct laser powder deposition process for Functionally Graded Materials (FGM) parts manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(5), 685–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning, F., Shi, Y., Cai, M., Xu, W., and Zhang, X. (2020). Manufacturing cost estimation based on a deep-learning method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 54, 186–195.

  • Ponche, R., Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P., & Hascoet, J. Y. (2014). A novel methodology of design for additive manufacturing applied to additive laser manufacturing process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 30(4), 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreve, K., Schuster, H. R., and Basson, A. H. (1999). Manufacturing cost estimation during design of fabricated parts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 213(7), 731–735.

  • Yang, S., Page, T., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Y. F. (2020). Towards an automated decision support system for the identification of additive manufacturing part candidates. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(8), 1917–1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. C., Krizan, S., and Ishii, K. (1993). Computer-aided design for manufacturing process selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 4(3), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Goel, A., Ghalsasi, O., & Anand, S. (2019). CAD-based design and pre-processing tools for additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 52, 277–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Touzé.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Touzé, S., Rauch, M. & Hascoët, JY. Methodology for complexity and cost comparison between subtractive and additive manufacturing processes. J Intell Manuf 35, 555–574 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02059-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02059-z

Keywords

Navigation