Tool wear monitoring in ultrasonic welding using high-order decomposition

Article
  • 184 Downloads

Abstract

Ultrasonic welding has been used for joining lithium-ion battery cells in electric vehicle manufacturing. The geometric profile change of tool shape significantly affects the weld quality and should be monitored during production. In this paper, a high-order decomposition method is suggested for tool wear monitoring. In the proposed monitoring scheme, a low dimensional set of monitoring features is extracted from the high dimensional tool profile measurement data for detecting tool wear at an early stage. Furthermore, the proposed method can be effectively used to analyze the data cross-correlation structure in order to help identify the unusual wear pattern and find the associated assignable cause. The effectiveness of the proposed monitoring method was demonstrated using a simulation and a real-world case study.

Keywords

Ultrasonic metal welding Tool wear monitoring High-order representation Principal component analysis (PCA) High-order singular value decomposition (HOSVD) 

References

  1. Abellan-Nebot, J. V., & Subirón, F. R. (2010). A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 47(1–4), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Lathauwer, L., de Moor, B., & Vandewalle, J. (2000). On the best rank-1 and rank-(R1, R2,., Rn) approximation of high order tensors. SIAM Journal of Matrix Analysis and Applications, 21(4), 1324–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. He, X., Cai, D., & Niyogi, P. (2005). Tensor subspace analysis, advances in neural information processing systems, 18 (NIPS). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hotelling, H. (1947). Multivariate quality control. Techniques of Statistical Analysis, 1947, 114–184.Google Scholar
  5. Jolliffe, I. (2005). Principal component analysis. New York: Wiley Online Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kisić, E., Durović, Z., Kovačević, B., & Petrović, V. (2015). Application of \(T^{2}\) control charts and hidden Markov models in condition-based maintenance at thermoelectric power plants. Hindawi corporation, Shock and Vibration, 2015, Article ID 960349.Google Scholar
  7. Kolda, T., & Bader, B. (2009). Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev, 51(3), 455–500.Google Scholar
  8. Li, X., Dong, S., & Yuan, Z. (1999). Discrete wavelet transform for tool breakage monitoring. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 39(12), 1935–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mason, R. L., Tracy, N. D., & Young, J. C. (1995). Decomposition of T2 for multivariate control chart interpretation. Journal of Quality Technology, 27(2), 109–119.Google Scholar
  10. Paynabar, K., Jin, J. J., & Pacella, M. (2013). Monitoring and diagnosis of multichannel nonlinear profile variations using uncorrelated multilinear principal component analysis. IIE Transactions, 45(11), 1235–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shao, C., Guo, W., Kim, T. H., Jin, J. J., Hu, S. J., Spicer, J. P., & Abell, J. A. (2014). Characterization and monitoring of tool wear in ultrasonic metal welding. In 9th international workshop on microfactories, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 5–8, (pp. 161–169).Google Scholar
  12. Shao, C., Kim, T. H., Jin, J. J., Hu, S. J., Spicer, J. P., & Abell, J. A. (2016). Tool wear monitoring for ultrasonic metal welding of lithium-ion batteries. ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138(5), 051005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shao, C., Paynabar, K., Kim, T. H., Jin, J. J., Hu, S. J., Spicer, J. P., et al. (2013). Feature selection for manufacturing process monitoring using cross-validation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(4), 550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shi, D., & Gindy, N. N. (2007). Tool wear predictive model based on least squares support vector machines. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(4), 1799–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yan, H., Paynabar, K., & Shi, J. (2015). Image-based process monitoring using low-rank tensor decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 99, 1–12.Google Scholar
  16. Zhou, J. H., Pang, C. K., Zhong, Z. W., & Lewis, F. L. (2011). Tool wear monitoring using acoustic emissions by dominant-feature identification. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60(2), 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Operations EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations