Skip to main content
Log in

Expectation effect of perceptual experience in sensory modality transitions: modeling with information theory

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A user’s experience of a product involves a set of state transitions. For example, the state of a sensory modality may shift from vision to touch to perceive a quality of a product. Between such state transitions, users expect experiences of the subsequent states as well as experience the current state event. A discrepancy between prior expectation and posterior experience evokes emotions, such as surprise, satisfaction, and disappointment, affecting the perceived product value. A noteworthy psychological phenomenon is that expectation affects perceived experience. This phenomenon, called the expectation effect, is a key to designing the affective experience of a product. Although experimental findings of this effect exist in a variety of disciplines, general and theoretical models of the effect are largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose a theoretical model of the expectation effect using information theory and affective expectation model. We hypothesize that Shannon’s entropy of prior subjective probability distributions of posterior experience determines the occurrence of an expectation effect, and the amount of information gained after experiencing a posterior event positively relates to the intensity of the expectation effect. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the conscious awareness of expectation discrepancy discriminates the two types of expectation effect, assimilation and contrast. To verify these hypotheses, we conducted an experiment using the tactile quality of surface texture. In the experiment, we extracted the visual expectation effect on tactile roughness and analyzed the causes of the effect based on these hypotheses. The experimental results validated the proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buckingham, G., Ranger, N. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2011). The material-weight illusion induced by expectations alone. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(1), 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Barnes, C. J., Childs, T. H. C., Henson, B., & Shao, F. (2009). Materials’ tactile testing and characterisation for consumer products’ affective packaging design. Materials & Design, 30(10), 4299–4310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childs, T., Agouridas, V., Barnes, C., & Henson, B. (2006). Controlled appeal product design: A life cycle role for affective (Kansei) engineering. In Proceedings of LCE2006, 537–542.

  • Deliza, R., & MacFie, H. J. H. (1996). The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies, 11(2), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir, E., Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2009). Appraisal patterns of emotions in human-product interaction. International Journal of Design, 3(2), 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. R., & Beltzner, M. A. (2000). Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nature Neuroscience, 3(7), 737–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geers, A. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1999). Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(4), 394–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollins, M., Faldowski, R., Rao, S., & Young, F. (1993). Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 54(6), 697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S., Karlof, K., & Young, F. (2000). Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1534–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49(10), 1295–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Matula, D. E. (1993). Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(4), 726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, S. J., Thorne, G., & Jones, B. (1986). Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(2), 169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludden, G. D. S., Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Hekkert, P. (2012). Beyond surprise: A longitudinal study on the experience of visual-tactual incongruities in products. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, N. (2002). Rough set approach to product design solution for the purposed kansei. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 48(6), 85–94.

  • Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. H. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447(7141), 206–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, T., Nakagawa, S., & Yanagisawa, H. (2011). Proposal of “Expectlogy” as design methodology. In international conference on engineering design 2011.

  • Okamoto, S., Nagano, H., & Yamada, Y. (2012). Psychophysical dimensions of tactile perception of textures. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(3), 460–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütte, S. T. W., Eklund, J., Axelsson, J. R. C., & Nagamachi, M. (2004). Concepts, methods and tools in Kansei Engineering. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(3), 214–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C., Weaver, W., Blahut, R., & Hajek, B. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 623–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., Smith, G., & Chen, Y.-R. (2013). A KE-LSA approach for user-centered design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 919–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, R., MacKenzie, S., & Olshavsky, R. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. The Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, B. A., Duggins, A., Penny, W., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2005). Information theory, novelty and hippocampal responses: Unpredicted or unpredictable? Neural Networks, 18(3), 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Kraft, D., & Wetzel, C. G. (1989). Preferences as expectation-driven inferences: Effects of affective expectations on affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa, H. (2010). Kansei quality in product design. In S. Fukuda (Ed.), Emotional engineering: Service development (pp. 289–310). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa, H., & Yuki, N. (2011). Deviation of visual expectation from somatosensory experience in emotional quality (Effects of surface characteristic in context of “lifting object”). Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, doi:10.1115/DETC2011-47568.

  • Yanagisawa, H., & Takatsuji, K. (2012). Effect of visual expectation on sensory design of tactile texture owing to expectation disconfirmation. Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, doi:10.1115/DETC2012-70186.

  • Zhou, F., Ji, Y., & Jiao, R. (2013). Affective and cognitive design for mass personalization: Status and prospect. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 1047–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K05755, the Design Innovation Lab at the University of Tokyo and its corporate partners. We would like to thank Professor Tamotsu Murakami, Professor Satoshi Nakagawa, Dr. Kazutaka Ueda, and members of the Design Engineering Lab at the University of Tokyo for supporting this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideyoshi Yanagisawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yanagisawa, H., Takatsuji, K. Expectation effect of perceptual experience in sensory modality transitions: modeling with information theory. J Intell Manuf 28, 1635–1644 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1096-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1096-7

Keywords

Navigation