Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SysML-based design chain information modeling for variety management in production reconfiguration

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Satisfying diverse customer needs leads to proliferation of product variants. It is imperative to model the coherence of functional, product and process varieties throughout the design chain. Based on a model-based systems engineering approach, this paper applies the Systems Modeling Language (SysML) to model design chain information. To support variety management decisions, the SysML-based information models are further implemented as a variety coding information system. A case study of switchgear enclosure production reconfiguration system demonstrates that SysML-based information modeling excels in conducting requirements, structural, behavioral and constraints analysis and in performing trade-off study. In addition, it maintains semantic coherence along the design chain, keeps traceability across different levels of abstraction, thus improving interoperability among heterogeneous tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akira T. (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-Firm Boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal 22(5): 403–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alblas, A., Zhang, L., & Wortmann, H. (2010). Representing function-technology platform based on the unified modeling language. International Journal of Production Research, Under Review.

  • Brunetti G., Golob B. (2000) A feature-based approach towards an integrated Product Model including conceptual design information. Computer-Aided Design 32(14): 877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candadai A., Herrmann J. W., Minis I. (1996) Application of group technology in distributed manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 7(4): 271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., Liu Y., & Paredis, C. J. (2010). Integration of system-level design and analysis models of mechatronic system behavior based on SysML and simscape. In Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences, Montreal, Canada.

  • Chincholkar, M. M., Herrmann, J. W., & Wei, Y. F. (2003). Applying design for production methods for improved product development. In Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences, DETC2003/DFM-48133, Illinois, USA.

  • Cho J., Han S., Kim H. (2006) Meta-ontology for automated information integration of Parts libraries. Computer-Aided Design 38(7): 713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. A., & Starkey, K., 1988, Organization Transitions and Innovation - Design, London.

  • Fiorentini, X., Sudarsan, R., Suh, H., Lee, J., & Sriram, R. D. (2008). An evaluation of description logic for the development Of product models. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Accepted for publication.

  • Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., & Steiner, R. (2008). A Practical Guide to SysML: The Systems Modeling Language.

  • Grabot B., Blanc J. C., Binda C. (1996) A decision support system for production activity control. Decision Support Systems 16(2): 87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann J. W., Chincholkar M. M. (2002) Reducing throughput time during product design. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 20(6): 416–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, E., Ramamurthy, R., & McGinnis, L. (2007). System and simulation modeling using SysML. in Proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference (pp. 796–803).

  • IBM. (2007). Software group-extended product lifecycle management. Solution Deep-Dive Design Chain Management.

  • Jiao J., Tseng M. M., Ma Q., Zou Y. (2000) Generic bill of materials and operations for high-variety production management. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application 8(4): 297–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao J., Zhang L., Pokharel S. (2007) Process platform planning for variety coordination from design to production in mass customization manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54(1): 112–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. A., Paredis, C. J., & Burkhart, R. M. (2008). Integrating models and simulations of continuous dynamics into SysML. 6th international Modelica conference (pp. 135–145). Linküping, Sweden: Modelica Association.

  • Johnson, T. A., Paredis, C. J., Burkhart, R., & Jobe, J. M. (2007). Modeling continuous system dynamics in SysML. ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Washington, USA.

  • Lee, Y. T. (1999). Information modeling: From design to implementation. In Proceedings of the second world manufacturing congress, Canada.

  • Li Z., Ramani K. (2007) Ontology-based design information extraction and retrieval. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 21(2): 137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. C. J., Liu, Y., & Lee, W. B. (2010). A methodology for building a semantically annotated multi-faceted ontology for product family modeling. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Online.

  • Lin H. K., Harding J. A., Shahbaz M. (2004) Manufacturing system engineering ontology for semantic interoperability across extended project teams. International Journal of Production research 42(24): 5099–5118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., & Zeng, Y. (2010). Formalization of design chain management using environment-based design theory. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, (in press).

  • Loffredo, D. (1998). Efficient database implementation of EXPRESS information models. Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York.

  • Martin M. V., Ishii K. (2002) Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design 13(4): 213–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. J., Crump, J. W., Fernandes, R., Keen, A., & Painter, M. K. (1995). Information integration for concurrent engineering (IICE) compendium of methods report. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433-7604, http://www.idef.com/pdf/compendium.pdf.

  • Ming X. G., Yan J. Q., Lu W. F., Ma D. Z. (2005) Technology solutions for collaborative product lifecycle management—status review and future trend. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 13(4): 311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan, R. P., Passey, S. J., Wong, P. L., Pritchard, M. C., & Nagappan, G. (2004). Performance measures and metrics for collaborative design chain management. In the 10th international conference on concurrent enterprising, Seville, Spain.

  • Nyere, J. (2006). The design chain operations reference model, supply chain council (SCC).

  • OMG (Object Management Group). (2009). OMG systems modeling language specification. http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.2/.

  • Olavson, T., & Fry, C. (2006). Understanding the dynamics of value-driven variety management, MIT Sloan Management Review, (Fall), 63–69.

  • Panchal J. H., Fernandez M. G., Allen J. K., Paredis C. J., Mistree F. (2009) A modular decision-centric approach for reusable design processes. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 17(1): 5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peak, R. S., Burkhart, R. M., Friedenthal, S. A., Wilson, M. W., Bajaj, M., & Kim, I. (2007). Simulation-based design using SysML part 1: A parametrics primer. INCOSE international symposium.

  • Poirier C. C., Reiter S. E. (1996) Supply chain optimization: Building the strongest total business network. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramdas K. (2003) Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production and Operations Management 12(1): 79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdas K., Zhylevskyy O., Moore W. (2010) A methodology to support product differentiation decisions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 57(4): 649–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. T. (1998). Planning product platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review, (Summer), 19–31.

  • Salvador, F., De Holan, P., & Piller, F. (2009). Cracking the code of mass customization. MIT Sloan Management Review, (Spring), 71–78.

  • Shah, A. A., Kerzhner, A. A., Schaefer, D., & Paredis, C. J. (2009). Multi-view modeling to support embedded systems engineering in SysML. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.

  • Sudarsan R., Baysal M. M., Roy U., Foufou S., Bock C., Fenves S. J., Subrahmanian E., Lyons K., Sriram R. D. (2005) Information models for product representation: Core and assembly models. International Journal of Product Development 2(3): 207–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh N. P. (2001) Axiomatic design: Advances and applications. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg D. (1998) Managing product development within a design chain. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 18(5): 508–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twigg D. (2005) Design chain, the Blackwell encyclopedia of management: Operations management. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K. T. (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24: 419–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich K. T., Randall T., Fisher M., Reibstein D. (1998) Managing product variety: A study of the bicycle industry, Managing Product Variety. Kluwer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. T. (2007). Variety. Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/~ulrich/documents/ulrich-variety.pdf.

  • van Veen E. A., Wortmann J. C. (1992) Generic bill of material processing systems. Production Planning & Control 3(3): 314–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J., Lin H. Y. (2006) A fuzzy hybrid decision-aid model for selecting partners in the design chain. International Journal of Production Research 44(10): 2047–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W. H., Yeh S. C., Fang L. C. (2007) The development of a collaborative design chain reference model for the motorcycle industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 35(3–4): 211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y. (2004) Environment-based formulization of design problem. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 8(4): 45–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha X. F., Sriram R. D. (2006) Platform-based product design and development: A knowledge-intensive support approach. Knowledge-Based Systems 19(7): 524–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Xu, Q., & Jiao, J. (2010). Domain-based production reconfiguration with constraint satisfaction. Computers in Industry, Under Review.

  • Zipkin P. (2001) The limits of mass customization. MIT Sloan Management Review 42(3): 81–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Dazhong Wu & Roger J. Jiao

  2. Department of Management, IESEG School of Management, Lille, France

    Linda L. Zhang

  3. Boeing Research & Technology, Seattle, WA, USA

    Roberto F. Lu

Authors
  1. Dazhong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda L. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roger J. Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberto F. Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dazhong Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, D., Zhang, L.L., Jiao, R.J. et al. SysML-based design chain information modeling for variety management in production reconfiguration. J Intell Manuf 24, 575–596 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0585-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0585-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation