Skip to main content
Log in

ICT-supported knowledge representation for development of routines in industry

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational Learning (OL) is important for a firm’s productivity growth. According to some literatures, information and communication technology do not support organizational learning and therefore not enhanced productivity. This research however has demonstrated that in the case of manufacturing companies some computer-based systems representing organizational knowledge—knowledge management systems (KMS) do support organizational learning. For OL to take place through KMS, our findings suggest that a deliberate organizational learning structure must be in place within the organization. This article demonstrates how knowledge management systems deliberately developed and implemented by management, can support the development of operating routines for manufacturing industries. KMS, if deliberately implemented for the purpose of empowering employee participation, may be a supporting mechanism for process and product improvement and innovation in manufacturing organizations. Such a structure may results, as our case demonstrates, in a dynamic and iterative employee—management knowledge development process resulting in productivity enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). What is an organization that it may learn?, Organizational Learning II. Mass., USA: Addison-Wesley, Reading

  • Brown J.S., Duguid P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science 2(1): 40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox: Computers are the catalyst for bigger changes. Communication of the ACM, August 1998 (accepted for publication). Web address: http://ccs.mit.edu/erik/.

  • Cangelosi V.E., Dill W.R. (1965). Organizational learning: Observations toward a theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 10(2): 175–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2003). Semantic learning as change enabler: Relating organizational identity and organizational learning. Handbook of Knowledge Management, Blackwell, 2003.

  • Crossan M.M., Lane H.W., White R.E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24(3): 522–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert R.M., March J.G. (1963). A behavior theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyle, M. A. (2003). Introduction: Watersheds of organizational learning and knowledge management. The Blackwell handbook of Organizational learning and Knowledge management, UK: Blackwell publishing Ltd.

  • Fiol C.M., Lyles M.A. (1985). Organizational Learning. Academy of Management Review 10(4): 803–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 1. March

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønhaug, K., & Kolltveit, K. (2005). IS Prosjekter: Implementering og Prosjektsuksess, Magma, årg. 8, nr. 4.

  • Huber, G. H. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1) February.

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, 14. In J. G. March (Ed.), The pursuit of organizational intelligence. Malden, USA: Blackwell, 1999.

  • Levitt B., March J.G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz J. (2006). Strategic intelligence, business intelligence, competitive intelligence, and knowledge management. Boca Raton, Auerbach Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R., Winter S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Reinmõller, P., & Toyama, R. (2001). Integrated information technology systems for knowledge creation. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Orlikowski W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11(4): 404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H., & Swan, J. (2003). Discourses of knowledge management and the learning organization: Their production and consumption. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 495–512). UK: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Thorsrud, E., & Emery, F. E. (1969). Mot en ny bedriftsorganisasjon, eksperimenter i industrielt demokrati. Oslo, J. G. Tanum Forlag.

  • Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2003). Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrated framework. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 122–141). UK: Blackwell publishing Ltd.

  • Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), May–June.

  • Wang K., Hjelmervik O.R., Bremdal B. (2001). Introduction to Knowledge Management, theory and practice. Trondheim, Tapir Akademiske Forlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J., Wang Q., Wan L., Zhong Y. (2005). Configuration- oriented product modeling and knowledge management for made-to-order manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology 25: 41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo M., Winter S.G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capability. Organization Science 13(3): 339

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kesheng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hjelmervik, O.R., Wang, K. ICT-supported knowledge representation for development of routines in industry. J Intell Manuf 18, 479–485 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0055-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-007-0055-3

Keywords

Navigation