This study deals with the integration of crisp and granular information for predicting the performance of a manufacturing process. Supporting and computing a set of two If-Then rules is considered the central idea for this integration. In these rules, the antecedent part deals with the recommended ranges of the control variables of the process, while the consequent part deals with the acceptable ranges of the performance measures of the process. The rules specify that if the control variables are kept within their recommended ranges, then it is likely or unlikely to get the performance measures within their acceptable ranges. The rules are supported by using the following conditional probabilities: the probability of getting the performance measures acceptable given that the control variables are within their recommended ranges (which should be likely), and the probability of getting performance measures acceptable given that the control variables are not within their recommended ranges (which should be unlikely). The remarkable thing is that both acceptable ranges and recommended ranges are subjectively defined concepts. So are likelihood perceptions such as “likely” and “unlikely.” Therefore, all of them can be defined by using some kind of fuzzy-granular information. The usefulness of this new approach is demonstrated by solving a machining decision-making problem (select cutting conditions and inserts satisfying subjectively defined surface finish requirement in terms of roughness and fractal dimension of machined surface). Further study should be directed toward understanding these rules in the context of predictive process planning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AC:
-
acceptable range
- AL:
-
absolutely likely
- AUL:
-
absolutely unlikely
- c-granular:
-
crisp-granular or semi-numerical information
- CV:
-
control variable
- DoB():
-
degree of belief of ()
- E():
-
expected value of ()
- FD:
-
fractal dimension
- f-granular:
-
fuzzy granular
- fp-granular:
-
fuzzy-probability granular
- LP:
-
linguistic probability
- LPL:
-
likelihood-predominant probability
- QL:
-
quite likely
- QUL:
-
quite unlikely
- ML:
-
most likely
- NA:
-
not acceptable
- NR:
-
not recommended
- PM:
-
performance measure
- PMIC:
-
performance measure constraint information
- PPA:
-
probabilistic-possibilistic algorithm
- Pr():
-
probability of ()
- P2 Rules:
-
probabilistic-possibilistic rules
- Ra:
-
Surface Roughness (arithmetic average)
- RA:
-
recommended range
- SI:
-
symbolic information
- SL:
-
some likely
- SUL:
-
some unlikely
- UPL:
-
unlikely-predominant probability
References
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (eds). (2000) The Handbook of Fuzzy Sets: Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, Volume 7, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht
ISO. (1997) Geometrical Product Specifications—Surface texture: Profile method—Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. 4287:1997
R. R. Aliev R. A. Aliev (2001) Soft Computing and Its Applications World Scientific Publication Singapore
C. A. Brown W. A. Johnsen K. M. Hult (1998) ArticleTitleScale-sensitivity, fractal analysis and simulations International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 38 IssueID5–6 633–637
O. Castillo P. Melin (2003) Soft Computing and Fractal Theory for Intelligent Manufacturing Springer-Verlage Heidelberg
Cooman, G. de. (2002) Precision-imprecision equivalence in a broad class of imprecise hierarchical uncertainty models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 105(1), 175–198
H. Kantz T. Schreiber (1997) Nonlinear Time Series Analysis Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series 7. Cambridge University Press Cambridge
B. B. Mandelbrot (1967) ArticleTitleHow long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension Science 156 636–638
Moon, F. C. (1994) Chaotic Dynamics and Fractals in Material Removal Processes, In Chapter 2 of Nonlinearity and Chaos in Engineering Dynamics, J. M. T. Thompson and S. R. Bishop (eds), John Wiley and Sons, New York
Negnevitsky, M. (2002) Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems. Chapter 4: Uncertainty management in rule-based expert systems, Addison-Wesley, England, pp. 55–86
E. H. Shortliffe B. G. Buchanan (1975) ArticleTitleA model of inexact reasoning in medicine Mathematical Biosciences 23 IssueID3–4 351–379
Ullah, A. M. M. S., Rahman, Md. R., Kachitvichyanuluk, V. and Harib, K. H. (2003) Fractal Dimension: A New Machining Decision-Making Parameter. Proceedings of the Forth International Conference on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials (IPMM’03), 18–23 May 2003, Sendai, Japan
Wally, P. (2000) Imprecise Probabilities: Overview. URL: http://ippserv.rug.ac.be
Zadeh, L. A. (2002) Toward a perception-based theory of probabilistic reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 105(1), 233–264
Zadeh, L. A. (2001) A new direction of AI—toward a computational theory of perceptions, AI Magazine, 22(1), 73–84
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ullah, A.M.M.S., Harib, K.H. Manufacturing process performance prediction by integrating crisp and granular information. J Intell Manuf 16, 317–330 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-005-7026-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-005-7026-3