Advertisement

Journal of International Entrepreneurship

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 12–37 | Cite as

Learning advantages of newness: A reconceptualization and contingent framework

  • Shaker A. Zahra
  • Congcong Zheng
  • Jifeng Yu
Article
  • 367 Downloads

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that new ventures (companies less than 6 years old) have advantages over established firms in terms of learning when internationalizing their operations. Yet, the concept of “learning advantages of newness” appears to be at odds with some central concepts in the organizational learning literature, probably because it is grounded in several assumptions that are open to debate. In this paper, we attempt to reconcile this incongruity by identifying the underlying assumptions of this concept, reconceptualizing the notion of learning advantages of newness, and showing that these advantages are contingent on several environmental, organizational, and strategic variables.

Keywords

Learning advantages of newness New venture internationalization Organizational learning Entrepreneurship 

Abstrait

Un corpus théorique grandissant suggère que les nouvelles entreprises (âgées de moins de six ans) ont des avantages comparativement aux grandes entreprises établies en termes d’apprentissage lorsqu’elles internationalisent leurs opérations. Jusqu’à maintenant, le concept «des avantages de la nouveauté dans le processus d’apprentissage» ne semble pas concorder avec des concepts centraux de la littérature sur l’apprentissage organisationnel, probablement parce qu’il est. fondé sur plusieurs prémisses qui sont encore débattues. Dans cet article, nous tentons de corriger cette incongruité: en identifiant les prémisses sous-jacentes de ce concept; en reconceptualisant la notion des avantages de la nouveauté dans le processus d’apprentissage; et en montrant que ces avantages sont contingents à des variables environnementales, organisationnelles et stratégiques.

Resumen

Una corriente de investigación creciente sugiere que las empresas de nueva creación (menores de seis años) poseen ventajas de aprendizaje sobre las más establecidas cuando internacionalizan sus operaciones. Sin embargo, el concepto de “ventajas de aprendizaje de novedad” parece entrar en discordancia con algunos de los conceptos centrales de la literatura de aprendizaje organizativo, probablemente porque se basa en varios supuestos que están abiertos a debate. En este artículo, tratamos de reconciliar esta incongruencia, de la siguiente manera: identificando los fundamentos subyacentes en este concepto; revisando conceptualmente la noción de ventajas de aprendizaje de novedad; y mostrando que estas ventajas son contingentes a determinadas variables del entorno, organizativas, y estratégicas.

Palabras clave

Ventajas de Aprendizaje de Novedad Internacionalización de Nuevas Empresas Aprendizaje Organizativo Emprendimiento 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Mike Peng, Kai-yu Hsieh, John Francis, Karen Ehrhart, Amy Randel, Lynn Shore, Martina Musteen, and Harry J. Sapienza for their comments on the earlier drafts of this paper. We acknowledge the contributions of R. Isil Yavuz to the earlier drafts of this paper, an earlier version of which was presented in the Academy of International Business Annual Conference. Congcong Zheng acknowledges a grant from the Lavin Entrepreneurship Center of San Diego State University, which has made this research possible.

References

  1. Al-Laham A, Souitaris V (2008) Network embeddedness and new-venture internationalization: analyzing international linkages in the German biotech industry. J Bus Ventur 23(5):567–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amburgey TL, Miner AS (1992) Strategic momentum: the effects of repetitive, positional and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strateg Manag J 13(5):335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson S (2004) Internationalization in different industrial contexts. J Bus Ventur 19(6):851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argote L (1999) Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad Manag J 43(5):909–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkema HG, Vermeulen F (1997) What differences in the cultural backgrounds of partners are detrimental for international joint ventures. J Int Bus Stud 28:845–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkema H, Vermeulen F (1998) International expansion through start-up or acquisition: a learning perspective. Acad Manag J 41:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barkema HG, Bell JHJ, Pennings JM (1996) Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strateg Manag J 17(2):152–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birley S, Stockley S (2000) Entrepreneurial teams and venture growth. In: Sexton DL, Landström H (eds) The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 287–307Google Scholar
  10. Bloodgood JM, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG 1996 The internationalization of new high-potential U.S. ventures: antecedents and outcomes. Enterp Theory Pract Summer 61–76Google Scholar
  11. Bourgeois LJI (1981) On the measurement of organizational slack. Acad Manag Rev 26:29–39Google Scholar
  12. Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Adm Sci Q 42(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruneel J, Yli-Renko H, Clarysse B (2010) Learning from experience and learning from others: how congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strateg Entrep J 4:164–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter MA, Fredrickson JW (2001) Top management team, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Acad Manag J 44(3):533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caruana A, Morris MH, Vella AJ (1998) The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. J Small Bus Manag 16(1):16–29Google Scholar
  16. Cavusgil ST, Knight G (2015) The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 46:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan CM, Makino S, Isobe T (2006) Interdependent behavior in foreign direct investment: the multi-level effects of prior entry and prior exit on foreign market entry. J Int Bus Stud 37:642–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ Sci 5(4):554–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 15:128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbett AC (2005) Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Enterp Theory Pract 29:473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coviello NE (2015) Re-thinking research on born globals. J Int Bus Stud 46:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1995) Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for international market development. Eur J Mark 29(7):49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coviello NE, Munro HJ (1997) Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. Int Mark Rev 6:361–386Google Scholar
  24. Coviello NE, McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2011) The emergence, advance and future of international entrepreneurship research—an introduction to the special forum. J Bus Ventur 26:625–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  26. DeClercq D, Sapienza H, Yavuz I, Zhou L (2012) Learning and knowledge in early internationalization research: past accomplishments and future directions. J Bus Ventur 27:143–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DeClercq D, Sapienza H, Zhou L (2014) Entrepreneurial strategic posture and learning effort in international ventures: the moderating roles of operational flexibilities. Int Bus Rev 23:981–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Deephouse DL (1996) Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad Manag J 39(4):1024–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delmar F, Shane AS (2003) Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strateg Manag J 24(12):1165–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Denrell J, March JG (2001) Adaptation as information restriction: the hot stove effect. Organ Sci 12(5):523–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dodgson M (1993) Organizational learning: a review of some literature. Organ Stud 14(3):375–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eisenhardt K (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environment. Acad Manag J 32(3):543–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisenhardt KM, Martin J (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21:1105–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eisenhardt KM, Zbaracki MJ (1992) Strategic decision making. Strateg Manag J 13(Winter Special Issue):17–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eriksson K, Johanson J, Majgard A, Sharma D (1997) Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. J Int Bus Stud 28:337–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fernhaber SA, Gilbert BA, McDougall PP (2008) International entrepreneurship and geographic location: an empirical examination of new venture internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 39:267–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Furuya N, Stevens MJ, Bird A, Oddou G, Mendenhall M (2009) Managing the learning and transfer of global management competence: antecedents and outcomes of Japanese repatriation effectiveness. J Int Bus Stud 40:200–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ganco M, Agarwal R (2009) Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: a complexity approach. Acad Manag Rev 34(2):228–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ghoshal S (1987) Global strategy: an organising framework. Strateg Manag J 8:425–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greve HR (1998) Performance, aspirations and risky organizational change. Adm Sci Q 43(1):58–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2013) Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: what shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups? Organ Sci 24:280–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Guillen MF (2002) Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China. Acad Manag J 45(3):509–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Harrison RT, Leitch CM (2005) Entrepreneurial learning: researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Enterp Theory Pract 29:351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haynie JM, Shepherd DA, Mosakowski E, Earley PC (2010) A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. J Bus Ventur 25:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heugens PPMAR, Lander MW (2009) Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): a meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Acad Manag J 52(1):61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Holcomb TR, Ireland RD, Holmes RM Jr, Hitt MA (2009) Architecture of entrepreneurial learning: exploring the link among heuristics, knowledge, and action. Enterp Theory Pract 33:167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR (1986) Induction: processes of inference, learning, and discovery. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literature. Organ Sci 2(1):88–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hyytinen A, Pajarinen M, Rouvinen P (2015) Does innovativeness reduce startup survival rates? J Bus Ventur 30:564–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1990) The mechanism of internationalization. Int Mark Rev 7(4):11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jones MV, Coviello NE (2005) Internationalisation: conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. J Int Bus Stud 36(3):284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kogut B (1988) Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strateg Manag J 9:319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ Sci 3(3):383–397Google Scholar
  57. Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J Int Bus Stud 24:625–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  59. Laperrière A, Spence M (2015) Enacting international opportunities: the role of organizational learning in knowledge-intensive business services. J Int Entrep 13(3):212–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lave J (1982) A comparative approach to educational forms and learning processes. Anthropol Educ Q 13(2):181–187Google Scholar
  61. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lave, J (1988) Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Lave J, Wenger E (1990) Situated learning: legitimate periperal participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annu Rev Sociol 14:319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strateg Manag J 22:565–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2004) International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Acad Manag J 47(4):598–609Google Scholar
  67. Manz C, Sims H (1990) Superleadership. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. March J (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2(1):71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mathews JA, Zander I (2007) The international entrepreneurial dynamics of accelerated internationalisation. J Int Bus Stud 38:387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McDougall PP, Shane S, Oviatt BM (1994) Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research. J Bus Ventur 9(6):469–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Miller D, Friesen PH (1984) A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Manag Sci 30(10):1161–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mitchell W, Shaver M, Yeung B (1994) Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies’ experience in United States medical sector markets. Strateg Manag J 15:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moen O, Servais P (2002) Born global or gradual global? Examining the export behavior of small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 10(3):49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mudambi R, Zahra S (2007) The survival of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 38(2):333–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nicholson N, Schuler RS, Van de Ven AH (1995) The Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of organizational behavior. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  76. Nohria N, Gulati R (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad Manag J 39(5):1245–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Oehme M, Bort S (2015) SME internationalization modes in the German biotechnology industry: the influence of imitation, network position, and international experience. J Int Bus Stud 46(6):629–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Operti E, Carnabuci G (2014) Public knowledge, private gain: the effect of spillover networks on firms’ innovative performance. J Manag 40:1042–1074Google Scholar
  79. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 1:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Petersen B, Pedersen T, Lyles MA (2008) Closing knowledge gaps in foreign markets. J Int Bus Stud 39:1097–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Politis D (2005) The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Enterp Theory Pract 29:399–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Posen HE, Chen JS (2013) An advantage of newness: vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organ Sci 24(6):1701–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Posen HE, Lee J, Yi S (2013) The power of imperfect imitation. Strateg Manag J 34(2):149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Prashantham S, Floyd SW (2012) Routine microprocesses and capability learning in international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 43(6):544–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Reuber AR, Fischer E (2002) Foreign sales and small firm growth: the moderating role of the management team. Enterp Theory Pract 27(1):29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Reuber AR, Fischer E (1997) The influence of the management team's international experience on the internationalization behaviors of SMEs. J Int Bus Stud 4:807–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):914–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sapienza HJ, De Clercq D, Sandberg W (2005) Antecedents of international and domestic learning effort. J Bus Ventur 20(4):437–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schilling MA, Vidal PG, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Manag Sci 49(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schwens C, Kabst R (2011) Internationalization of young technology firms: A complementary perspective on antecedents of perceived foreign market familiarity. Int Bus Rev 20:60–74Google Scholar
  93. Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm Sci Q 26(4):501–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  95. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Terlaak A, Gong Y (2008) Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Acad Manag Rev 33(4):846–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tushman ML, Romanelli E (1985) Organisational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res Organ Behav 7:171–222Google Scholar
  98. Uzzi B (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients. Manag Sci 49(4):383–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Walsh JP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organ Sci 6(3):280–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Walsh JP, Fahey L (1986) The role of negotiated belief structures in strategy making. J Manag 12(3):325–338Google Scholar
  101. Williams DW, Grégoire D, A. (2015) Seeking commonalities or avoiding differences? Re-conceptualizing distance and its effects on internationalization decisions. J Int Bus Stud 46(3):253–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ (2001) Social capital, knowledge-acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strateg Manag J 22:587–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yu J, Gilbert BA, Oviatt B (2011) Effects of alliances, time, and network cohesion on the initiation of foreign sales by new ventures. Strateg Manag J 32(4):424–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad Manag J 38(2):341–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zaheer S, Mosakowski E (1997) The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services. Strateg Manag J 18(6):439–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zahra SA (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zahra SA, George G (2002) International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda. In: Hitt MA, Duane Ireland R, Sexton DL (eds) Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  108. Zahra S, Gianco G, Naldi L, Larrañeta B 2015 Industry knowledge characteristics, prior experience and new venture survival. Paper presented at the annual Academy of Management MeetingGoogle Scholar
  109. Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad Manag J 43(5):925–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zander I, McDougall-Covin P, Rose EL (2015) Born globals and international business: evolution of a field of research. J Int Bus Stud 26:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zhou L, Barnes BR, Lu Y (2010) Entrepreneurial proclivity, capability upgrading and performance advantage of newness among international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 41:882–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zollo M, Singh H (2004) Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers. Strateg Manag J 25:1233–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Strategic Management & Organization, Carlson School of ManagementUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, College of Business AdministrationSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Management, College of Business AdministrationUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations