Skip to main content
Log in

Contestability in the Digital Music Player Market

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We test the concept of contestability in the digital music player market. The theory suggests that the threat of new entrants keeps firms’ market power in check. But Baumol and others argue that pure contestable markets rarely happen in reality. The portable music player market has been dominated by one producer. We estimate a quality-adjusted price index from 2002 to 2010. Results show that market prices decline at an average rate of about 20 percent per year, which is similar to other IT products. This provides support for the idea that the market is fairly contestable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Baumol et al. (1986, 1988) and Willig (2008).

  2. All prices quoted in this paper are in U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.

References

  • Apple Inc. (2004) iTunes Music Store Catalog Tops One Million Songs, Apple Press Info, Available at <http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2004/08/10iTunes-Music-Store-Catalog-Tops-One-Million-Songs.html>

  • Associated Press (2014) Apple Wins Class-Action Lawsuit Over iPod Prices, The New York Times, December 16 issue

  • Bailey EE, Baumol WJ (1984) Deregulation and the theory of contestable markets. Yale J Regul 1:111–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1986) On the theory of perfectly-contestable markets. In: Stiglitz JE, Mathewson GF (eds) New developments in the analysis of market structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1988) Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure revised edition. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt ER, Rappaport NJ (2001) Price and Quality of Desktop and Mobile Personal Computers: A Quarter-Century Historical Overview. Amer Econ Rev 91 (2):268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breznitz D, Kenney M, Rouvinen P, Zysman J, Ylä-Anttila P (2011) Value capture and policy design in a digital economy. J IndCompet Trade 11(3):203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow GC (1967) Technological change and the demand for computers. Amer Econ Rev 57(5):1117–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwelos PD, Berndt ER, Cockburn IM (2008) Faster, smaller, cheaper: an hedonic price analysis of PDAs. Appl Econ 40(22):2839–2856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Court AT (1939) Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples, in the dynamics of automobile demand. General Motors Corporation, New York, pp 99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert WE (2004) Elementary indices. In Consumer price index manual: theory and practice, Geneva: International Labour Office, Chapter 20: 355–371

  • Edwards B (2011) The birth of the iPod, Macworld, October 23 issue

  • Grobart S, Rusli EM (2011) For flip video camera, four years from hot Start-Up to obsolete, The New York Times, pp B1

  • Kenney M, Rouvinen P, Zysman J (2015) The Digital Disruption and its Societal Impacts. J Ind Compet Trade 15(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushida KE, Murray J, Zysman J (2015) Cloud computing: From scarcity to abundance. J Ind Compet Trade 15(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liegey P, Shepler N (1999) Adjusting VCR prices for quality change: a study using hedonic methods. Mon Labor Rev 122(9):22–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjoo F (2012) The Flop That Saved Microsoft, Slate, October 26 issue

  • Pon B, Seppälä T, Kenney M (2015) One ring to unite them all: convergence, the Smartphone, and the Cloud. J Ind Compet Trade 15(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prud’homme M, Sanga D, Yu K (2005) A computer software price index using scanner data. Can J Econ 38(3):999–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd WG (1984) ‘Contestability’ vs. Competition. Amer Econ Rev 74 (4):572–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson I, Rosen E (2014) Absolute value: What really influences customers in the age of (nearly) perfect information. New York, Harper Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1987) Technological change, sunk costs, and competition. Brook Papers Econ Act 1987(3):833–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (1991) Sunk costs and market structure : Price competition, advertising and the evolution of concentration. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton J (1996) Technology and market structure: Theory and history. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Triplett JE (1989) Price and Technological Change in a Capital Good: A Survey of Research on Computers. In: Dale W.Jorgenson and Ralph Landau (eds), Technology and Capital Formation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 127–213

  • Triplett J (2004) Handbook on hedonic indexes and quality adjustments in price indexes: Special application to information technology products, STI working paper 2004/9 statistical analysis of science, Technology and Industry, OECD

  • van der Grient H, Haan J (2003) An almost ideal hedonic price index for televisions. Paper presented to the International Working Group on Price Indices (Seventh Meeting), pp 111–122

  • Willig RD (2008) Contestable markets. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn, vol 2. Palgrave Macmillan, pp 182–187

  • Yangzom K (2013) Applying the hedonic quality adjustment method to digital cameras, Unpublished study, Statistics Canada

  • Yu K, Prud’homme M (2010) Econometric issues in hedonic price indices: the case of internet service providers. Appl Econ 42:1973–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Corinne Langinier, Bakhtiar Moazzami, Rob Petrunia, an anonymous reviewer, and the participants of the 49th Annual Conference of the Canadian Economics Association for valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kam Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, W., Yu, K. Contestability in the Digital Music Player Market. J Ind Compet Trade 19, 293–311 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-018-0284-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-018-0284-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation