Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competition for Business Location: A Survey

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the links between firms’ mobility and the shaping of regional policy, with a particular focus on tax and infrastructure policy decisions. We survey the recent literature exploring the impact of firms’ location choice, and its determinants, on the level of competition between regional governments. We confront theoretical results with empirical evidences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bade, F. and Nerlinger, E., “The spatial distribution of new technology-based firms: Empirical results for West-Germany,” Papers in Regional Science, vol. 79(2), pp. 155–176, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., and Robert-Nicoud, F., Economic Geography and Public Policies. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, S., Gorg, H., and Strobl, E., “Multinationals’ location choice, agglomeration economies, and public incentives,” International Regional Science Review, vol. 29(1), pp. 81–107, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrel, R. and Pain, N., “Domestic institutions, agglomeration and foreign direct investment in Europe,” European Economic Review, vol. 43(4–6), pp. 925–934, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, P. and Cabral, L., “Competing for foreign direct investment,” Review of International Economics, vol. 8(2), pp. 360–371, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, F., Gorg, H., and Strobl, E., “Foreign direct investment, agglomerations and demonstration effects: An empirical investigation,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 139, pp. 583–600, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayindir-Upmann, T., “Two games of interjurisdictional competition when local governments provide industrial public goods,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 5, pp. 471–487, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellak, C., “How domestic and foreign firms differ and why does it matter?,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 18(4), pp. 483–514, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benassy-Quere, A., Fontagne, L., and Lahreche-Revil, A., “How does FDI react to corporate taxation?,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 12(5), pp. 583–603, 2005a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benassy-Quere, A., Gobalraja, N., and Trannoy, A., “Tax competition and public input,” CEPII Working Papers, 2005–8, 2005b.

  • Billington, N., “The location of foreign direct investment: An empirical analysis,” Applied Economics, vol. 31(1), pp. 65–76, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Cuff, K., and Marceau, N., “Inter-jurisdictional competition for firms,” International Economic Review, vol. 43, pp. 761–782, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Cuff, K., and Marceau, N., “Agglomeration effects and the competition for firms,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol.  11(5), pp. 623–645, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borck, R. and Pflüger, M., “Agglomeration and tax competition,” European Economic Review, vol. 50(3), pp. 647–668, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudier-Bensebaa, F., “Agglomeration economies and location choice: Foreign direct investment in Hungary,” Economics of Transition, vol. 13(4), pp. 605–628, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougheas, S., Demetriades, P., and Morgenroth, E., “International aspects of public infrastructure investment,” Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 36(4), pp. 884–910, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. and Nalebuff, B., Co-opetition. Doubleday, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, 1996.

  • Brueckner, J., “Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies,” International Regional Science Review, vol. 26(2), pp. 175–188, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. and Saavedra, L., “Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition?,” National Tax Journal, vol. 54(3), pp. 231–253, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buch, C., Kleinert, J., Lipponer, A., and Toubal, F., “Determinants and effects of foreign direct investment: Evidence from German firm-level data,” Economic Policy, vol. 20(41), pp. 52–110, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, T., “Local business taxation and competition for capital: The choice of the tax rate,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 31(2,3), pp. 215–245, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, T., “Tax base effects and fiscal externalities of local capital taxation: Evidence from a panel of German jurisdictions,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 54(1), pp. 110–128, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner, T. and Ruf, M., “Tax incentives and the location of FDI: Evidence from a panel of German multinationals,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 14(2), pp. 151–164, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, F., Langset, B., and Rattso, J., “The relationship between firm mobility and tax level: Empirical evidence of fiscal competition between local governments,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol.  58(2), pp. 273–288, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A., “The determinants of foreign direct investment: Sensitivity analyses of cross-region regressions,” Kyklos, vol. 54(1), pp. 89–113, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlot, S., “Economie géographique et secteur public: Des infrastructures de transport à la concurrence fiscale,” Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, vol.  1, pp. 5–16, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, P.-P. and Lafourcade, M., “Transportation costs decline and regional inequalities: Evidence from France, 1978–1993,” CEPR Discussion Paper, vol. 2894, 2001.

  • Coughlin, C. and Segev, E., “Location determinants of foreign-owned manufacturing plants,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 40(2), pp. 323–351, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, M., Mayer, T., and Mucchielli, J.-L., “How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 34(1), pp. 27–54, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R., “State tax competition for foreign direct investment: A winnable war?,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 67(2), pp. 498–512, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. and Weinstein, D., “Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical assessment,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 59(51), pp. 1–23, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembour, C. and Wauthy, X., “Investment in public infrastructure and tax competition between contiguous regions,” Cahiers du CEREC, 2003/3, 2003.

  • De Mooij, R. and Ederveen, S., “Taxation and foreign direct investment: A synthesis of empirical research,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 10, pp. 673–693, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M., Lockwood, B., and Redoano, M., “Do countries compete over corporate tax rates?,” CEPR Discussion Paper, 3400, 2002.

  • Devereux, M. and Griffith, R., “Taxes and the location of production: Evidence from a panel of US multinationals,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 68(3), pp. 335–367, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. and Griffith, R., “Evaluating tax policy for location decisions,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 10, pp. 107–126, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M., Griffith, R., and Simpson, H., “Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 91(3,4), pp. 413–435, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohse, D., “Infrastructure provision and locational efficiency in a federation: A numerical approach,” Papers in Regional Science, vol. 77(3), pp. 241–263, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumais, G., Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E., “Geographic concentration as a dynamic process,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 84(2), pp. 193–204, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G. and Puga, D., “From sectoral to functional urban specialization,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 57(2), pp. 343–370, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, W. and Haufler, A., “Company tax coordination cum tax rate competition in the European Union,” Finanz Archiv, vol. 62(4), pp. 579–601, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Communities, Conclusions of the ECOFIN Council meeting on 1 December 1997 concerning taxation policy (including code of conduct for business taxation), Official Journal of the European Communities 98/C 2/01, Brussels, 1998.

  • Ferrer, C., “Pattern and determinants of location decisions by French multinationals in European regions,” in Rugman, A. and Mucchielli, J.-L. (eds.), Multinational location strategy, Greenwich and London, JAI Press, pp. 117–138, 1998.

  • Figuieres, C., Garderes, P., and Rychen, F., “Infrastructures publiques et politiques de développement décentralisées,” L’Actualité économique, vol. 78(4), pp. 539–570, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S. and Strange, R., “Where do Japanese manufacturing firms invest within Europe, and why?,” Transnational Corporation, vol. 8(1), pp. 117–142, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, P., List, J., and Millimet, D., “Chasing the smokestack: Strategic policymaking with multiple instruments,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 34, pp. 387–410, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., and Venables, A., The Spatial Economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M. and Thisse, J.-F., Economics of Agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

  • Fumagalli, C., “On the welfare effects of competition for foreign direct investments,” European Economic Review, vol. 47(6), pp. 963–983, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J., Game Theory. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabe, T. and Bell, K., “Tradeoffs between local taxes and government spending as determinant of business location,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 44(1), pp. 21–41, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., Greenaway, D., and Wakelin, K., “Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK?,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 48(2), pp. 119–133, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D., “Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 34(1), pp. 19–39, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorg, H. and Strobl, E., “Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis,” Economic Journal, vol. 111(475), pp. 723–739, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorg, H. and Strobl, E., “Spillovers from foreign firms through worker mobility: An empirical investigation,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 107(4), pp. 693–709, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubert, H. and Mutti, J., “Do taxes influence where U.S. corporations invest?,” National Tax Journal, vol. 53(4), pp. 825–840, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes, P., Figueiredo, O., and Woodward, D., “Agglomeration and the location of foreign direct investment in Portugal,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 47(1), pp. 115–135, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, J. and Wooton, I., “International competition for multinational investment,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 101(4), pp. 631–649, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haaparanta, P., “Competition for foreign direct investments,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 63, pp. 141–153, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, A. and Wooton, I., “Country size and tax competition for foreign direct investment,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 71(1), pp. 121–139, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haufler, A. and Wooton, I., “The effects of regional tax and subsidy coordination on foreign direct investment,” European Economic Review, vol. 50(2), pp. 285–305, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, M. and Boadway, R., “An empirical analysis of intergovernmental tax interaction: The case of business income taxes in Canada,” Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne d’Economique, vol. 34(2), pp. 481–503, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, C., “Information costs, agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment in China,” Regional Studies, vol. 36(9), pp. 1029–1036, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, K. and Mayer, T., “Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 86(4), pp. 959–972, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., Ries, J., and Swenson, D., “Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 29(2), pp. 197–218, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks, J., Peralta, S., and Weber, S., “Fiscal competition, revenue sharing, and policy-induced agglomeration,” CORE Discussion Papers, 2005/93, 2005.

  • Holl, A., “Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure: Empirical evidence from Spain,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 34(3), pp. 341–363, 2004a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl, A., “Transport infrastructure, agglomeration economies, and firm birth: Empirical evidence from Portugal,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 44(4), pp. 693–712, 2004b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H., “Stability in competition,” Economic Journal, vol. 39, pp. 41–57, 1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, F. and Pain, N., “Inward investment and technical progress in the United Kingdom manufacturing sector,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 48(2), pp. 134–147, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulten, C. and Schwab, R., “A fiscal federalism approach to infrastructure policy,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 27, pp. 139–159, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janeba, E., “Tax competition in imperfectly competitive markets,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 44(1), pp. 135–153, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justman, M., Thisse, J.-F., and Van Ypersele, T., “Taking the bite out of fiscal competition,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 52(2), pp. 294–315, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justman, M., Thisse, J.-F., and Van Ypersele, T., “Fiscal competition and regional differentiation,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 35(6), pp. 848–861, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. and Owen, J., “Should governments compete for foreign direct investment?,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 59(2), pp. 230–248, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, H., Midelfart-Knarvik, K., and Schjelderup, G., “Competing for capital in a lumpy world,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 78(3), pp. 253–274, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogstrup, S., “A synthesis of recent developments in the theory of capital tax competition,” EPRU Working Paper Series, 2004–2002, 2004.

  • Ludema, R. and Wooton, I., “Economic geography and the fiscal effects of regional integration,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 52(2), pp. 331–357, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. and Rogers, C., “Industrial location and public infrastructure,” Journal of International Economics, vol. 39(3,4), pp. 335–351, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, B. and Walz, U., “Regional competition for mobile oligopolistic firms: Does public provision of local inputs lead to agglomeration?,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 40(2), pp. 353–375, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. and Mucchielli, J.-L., “La localisation à l’étranger des entreprises multinationales: Une approche géographique hiérarchisée appliquée aux entreprises japonaises en Europe,” Economie et Statistique, 326–327, pp. 159–167, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P. and Shefer, D., “Location, agglomeration and infrastructure,” Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, pp. 177–196, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucchielli, J.-L. and Puech, F., “Internationalisation et localisation des firmes multinationales: l’exemple des entreprises françaises en Europe,” Economie et Statistique, 363–365, pp. 129–144, 2003.

  • Ottaviano, G. and Thisse, J.-F., “Agglomeration and geography,” in Henderson, J. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics: Cities and Geography, North-Holland, Amsterdam, vol. 4, 2004.

  • Peri, G. and Urban, D., “Catching-up to foreign technology? Evidence on the ’Veblen-Gerschenkron’ effect of foreign investments,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 36(1), pp. 72–98, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflüger, M., “A simple, analytically solvable chamberlinian agglomeration model,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 34(5), pp. 565–573, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelli, F., “On spatial public finance empirics,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 12(4), pp. 475–492, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoholm, F., “Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: Evidence from establishment data,” Journal of Development studies, vol. 36(1), pp. 53–73, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, P., “The Case for International Tax Coordination Reconsidered,” Economic Policy, vol. 15(31), 429–472, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. and Webb, M., “International competition in corporate taxation: Evidence from the OECD time series,” Economic Policy, vol. 21(45), pp. 153–201, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowhase, S., “Tax-rate differentials and sector-specific foreign direct investment: empirical evidence from the EU,” FinanzArchiv, vol. 61(4), pp. 535–558, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C., “A pure theory of local expenditures,” Journal of Political Economics, vol. 64, pp. 416–424, 1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbussche, H., Janssen, B., and Crabbe, K., “Is there regional tax competition? Firm level evidence for Belgium,” De Economist, vol. 153(3), pp. 257–276, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, U. and Wellisch, D., “Strategic provision of local public inputs for oligopolistic firms in the presence of endogenous location choice,” in Wildasin, D. (ed.), Fiscal aspects of evolving federations. Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–138, 1997.

  • Wasylenko, M., “Taxation and economic development: The state of the economic literature,” New England Economic Review, March/April, pp. 37–52, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. and Wildasin, D., “Capital tax competition: Bane or boon?,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 88(6), pp. 1065–109, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, H., “Has tax competition emerged in OECD regions? Evidence from panel data,” International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 12(5), pp. 667–687, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooders, M. and Zissimos, B., “Hotelling tax competition,” CESifo Working Paper, 932, 2003.

  • Wooders, M. and Zissimos, B., “Relaxing tax competition through public good differentiation,” Vanderbilt Working Paper, 06-W01, 2006.

  • Woodward, D., “Locational determinants of Japanese manufacturing start-ups in the United States,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 58(3), pp. 690–708, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEREC, Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, 43 Boulevard du Jardin Botanique, 1000, Brussels, Belgium

    C. Dembour

Authors
  1. C. Dembour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Dembour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dembour, C. Competition for Business Location: A Survey. J Ind Compet Trade 8, 89–111 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-007-0013-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-007-0013-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation