Abstract
The attempt to define the term “competitiveness of nations” has reached the phase of decreasing returns. Fortunately, the literature seems to be converging slightly, a tendency, we hope to accelerate. We propose (1) defining competitiveness as “the ability of a country or location to create welfare.” We maintain (2) that a comprehensive evaluation contains an output evaluation and a process evaluation. We claim (3) that the output evaluation (competitiveness achieved) is closely related to a welfare assessment, with a specific slant and stepwise operationalisations. Furthermore, (4) process evaluation (investigating the ability) is related to the analysis of production and technology functions, adding qualitative elements like strategies, and the strengths and weaknesses of a country. This consensus is at variance with the concept of price competitiveness; it sidelines the importance of external balances, while the productivity approach to competitiveness is nested within. Dangerous obsessions and wrong policy conclusions can never be excluded, but are much less likely if we use this approach to competitiveness—as compared to concepts focusing on price competitiveness or on external balances. Specifically, the greater competitiveness of one country must not necessarily go hand in hand with lower competitiveness in other countries. In advanced countries specifically, policies promoting the ability to create welfare will create positive spillovers into other economies.
References
Aiginger, K., “The use of unit values for discriminating between price and quality competition,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996.
Aiginger, K., “A framework for evaluating the dynamic competitiveness of countries,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 9(2), pp. 159–188, 1998.
Aiginger, K., Europe’s Position in Quality Competition, Background Report for “The European Competitiveness Report 2000,” DG Enterprise, Brussels, 2000.
Aiginger, K., “Revisiting an evasive concept: Introduction to the special issue on competitiveness,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.
Aiginger, K. and Landesmann, M., “Competitive economic performance: The European view,” Conference on Transatlantic Perspectives on US-EU Economic Relations: Convergence, Conflict & Cooperation, Harvard University, April 2002, WIFO Working Paper No. 179, June 2002.
Aiginger, K. and Peneder, M., Die qualitative Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der österreichischen Industrie, Wien, 1994.
Aiginger, K. and Wolfmayr, Y., The qualitative competitiveness of transition countries, OECD, April 1996.
Beck, B., Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der schweizerischen Exportindustrie, Paul Haupt Verlag, Bern, Stuttgart, 1990.
Cantwell, J., “Innovation and Competitiveness,” in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, 2004.
Competitiveness Policy Council: Promoting long term productivity. “Third report to the President and the Congress,” Government Printing Office, Washington, 1994.
Cooper, R.N., “The Competitive Position of the United States,” in Seymour (ed.), The Dollar in Crisis, Burlingame, New York, 1961.
D’Aspremont, C. and Gevers, L., “Social welfare functionals and international comparability,” in Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1, 2002.
Europäische Wirtschaft, Die Wettbewerbsposition Europas in der Triade, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1994, Nr. 56, 1994.
Europäische Wirtschaft, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1995, Nr. 59, 1995.
European Commission, European Competitiveness Reports, 1998, Brussels.
European Commission, Die Wirtschaftsaussichten für die Gemeinschaft: 1994–96, Beiheift A 11/12, 1994.
European Commission, Jahreswirtschaftsbericht 1995, Nr. 59, 1995.
European Commission, Competitiveness of European Manufacturing. DG Enterprise, Brussels, 2001.
Fagerberg, J., “International Competitiveness,” The Economic Journal, vol. 98, pp. 355–374, 1988.
Fagerberg, J., “Technology and international differences in growth rates,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33(3), pp. 1147–1175, 1994.
Fagerberg, J., Verspagen, B., and Von Tunzelmann, N., “The dynamics of technology, trade and growth,” Edward Elgar, 1994.
Faust, K. and Schedl, H., “The International Competitiveness of German Industry,” IFO-Institut, München, 1984.
Gordon, R.J., Two Centuries of Economic Growth: Europe Chasing the American Frontier, Paper prepared for the Economic History Workshop, Northwestern University, October 2002.
Grilo, I. and Koopman, G.J., “Productivity and microeconomic reforms: Strengthening EU competitiveness,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.
Grupp, H., “Science, high technology and the competitiveness of EU countries,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, pp. 209–223, 1995.
Gutmann, G., Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Band 239, 1994.
Hatsopoulos, G.N., Krugman, P.R., and Summers, L.H., “U.S competitiveness: Beyond the trade deficit,” Science, vol. 241, pp. 299–307, 1988.
IMD, “The World Competitiveness Yearbook,” 1994.
Ketels, Ch.H.M., “Michael Porter’s competitiveness framework—recent learnings and new research priorities,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.
Kloth, H., Stehn, J., et al., Standort Deutschland: Strukturelle Herausforderungen im neuen Europa, Kieler Studien, 265, Tübingen, 1994.
Kohler, W., “The “Lisbon Goal” of the EU: Rhetoric or substance?” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.
Krugman, P., “Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(2), pp. 28–44, March–April, 1994a.
Krugman, P., “The fight over competitiveness: A zero sum debate: Response: proving my point,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(4), July–August 1994b.
Krugman, P., “Making sense of the competitiveness debate,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12(3), pp. 17–25, 1996.
Krugman, P.R. and Hatsopoulos, G.N., “The problem of U.S. competitiveness in manufacturing,” New England Economic Review, pp. 18–29, January/February 1987.
Legler, H., “Zur Position der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im internationalen Wettbewerb,” in Forschungsberichte des Niedersächsischen Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 3, 1982.
Lippschitz, L. and McDonald, D., “Real exchange rates and competitiveness,” Empirica, vol. 19, pp. 37–69, 1992.
Löbbe, K., “Innovationen, Investitionen und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der deutschen Wirtschaft,” RWI Heft 16: Essen, 1995.
Marston, R.C., “Real and nominal exchange rate variability,” Empirica, vol. 16, pp. 147–160, 1989.
Mueller, D., “The persistence of profits above the norm,” Economica, vol. 44(176), pp. 369–380, 1977, London School of Economics and Political Science.
OECD, “Industry and Technology: Scoreboard of indicators,” Paris, 1994.
OECD, Competitiveness policy: A new agenda DSTI/IND (95)14, Paris, 1995a.
OECD, Competitiveness: an overview of reports issued in member countries DSTI/IND (95)15, Paris, 1995b.
OECD/TEP, Technology and the economy. The key relationships, The technology/economy programme, Paris, 1992.
Orlowski, D., “Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einer Volkswirtschaft,” Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen, 1982.
Oughton, C., “Competitiveness policy in the 1990s,” The Economic Journal, vol. 107(444), 1997.
Oughton, C. and Whittam, G., “Competition and cooperation in the small firm sector,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 44(1), 1997.
Peneder, M., “Pattern of Industrial Competitiveness,” Wien, 1994.
Peneder, M., “Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Standortqualität. Eine Kritik der Länder-Ranglisten,” Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, vol. 46(3), pp. 170–177, 1999.
Porter, M.E., “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” The Free Press: New York, 1990.
Porter, M.E., “Building the microeconomic foundations of prosperity: Findings from the business competitiveness index,” in Porter, M.E. et al. (eds.), Global Competitiveness Report 2003–2004 of the World Economic Forum. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 29–56, 2004.
President’s Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, “Global Competition,” Government Printing Office: Washington, 1985.
Rodrik, D. (ed.), “In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth,” Princeton University Press, 2003.
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F., “Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 9(2), June 2004.
Schumacher, D., Belitz, H., Haid, A., Hornschild, K., Petersen, H.J., Straßberger, F., and Trabold, H., Technologische Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, DIW Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, Heft 155, 1995.
Scott, B., and Lodge, G. (eds.), US Competitiveness and the World Economy. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, 1985.
Siggel, E., “International competitiveness and comparative advantage: A survey and a proposal for measurement,” Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 6(2), 2006.
Silverberg, G. and Soete, L., “Economics of Growth and Technological Change,” Edward Elgar, 1994.
Sinn, H.W., Schlingerkurs: Lohnpolitik und Investitionsförderung in den neuen Bundesländern. in Gutmann, G., Die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft, Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Band 239, 1994.
Soete, L., “The impact of technological innovation on international trade,” Research Policy, vol. 16, pp. 101–130, 1987.
Suntum, U., “Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit einer Volkswirtschaft,” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, vol. 106(5), 1986.
The German Sachverständigenrat, “Investieren für mehr Beschäftigung,” Jahresgutachten zur wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 1981.
Uri, P., “Bericht über die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Europäischen Gemeinschaft,” Luxembourg, 1971.
Von Tunzelmann, G.N., “Government policy and the long run dynamics of competitiveness,” Structural change and economic Dynamics, vol. 6, pp. 1–21, 1995.
World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report, 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aiginger, K. Competitiveness: From a Dangerous Obsession to a Welfare Creating Ability with Positive Externalities. J Ind Compet Trade 6, 161–177 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-9475-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-9475-6