Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revisiting an Evasive Concept: Introduction to the Special Issue on Competitiveness

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term competitiveness stems from the analysis of firms and is usually thought to be well defined at the firm level. Today, however, the notion competitiveness has become a prominent concept in the assessment of countries, regions and locations. The competitive advantage of nations and the competitiveness of locations have become important topics in economic policy. Interest in this field has been notably stimulated by the work of Michael Porter. Although the diversity of approaches presented in this issue may appear large to the reader, it is in reality dwarfed by the multiplicity of concepts, articles and books which have been written in reference to the term competitiveness. The vagueness of the general term, the lack of theoretical background, implicit preferences and prejudices, and finally the scope of policy recommendations made in reference to this term have induced outstanding researchers to warn that the term competitiveness of a nation could be dangerous, obsessive, elusive or meaningless.1 The articles presented in this volume share some elements of this critique, but also demonstrate that research is being continued, and that it is indeed relevant to the design and evaluation of economic policy, most notably, the so-called Lisbon Strategy of the European Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiginger, K., Die internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Österreichs. WIFO: Wien, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., “The use of unit values for discriminating between price and quality competition.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1996.

  • Aiginger, K., “A framework for evaluating the dynamic competitiveness of countries,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 9(2), pp. 159–188, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., Europe’s Position in Quality Competition, Enterprise paper for The European Competitiveness Report 2000, 2000.

  • Krugman, P.R., “Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(2), pp. 28–44, March–April, 1994A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R., “The fight over competitiveness: A zero sum debate: Response: proving my point.” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73(4), July–August 1994B.

  • Krugman, P., “Making Sense of the Competitiveness Debate,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 12(3), pp. 17–25, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” The Free Press, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., “Building the Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index”, in Porter, M.E. et al. (eds.), Global Competitiveness Report 2003–2004 of the World Economic Forum, Oxford, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 29–56, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfmayr, Y., “Trade Performance of CEECs According to Technology Class,” in The Competitiveness of Transition Economies, OECD proceedings, 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Aiginger.

Additional information

1All four adjectives are found in articles by Krugman (1994A, B, 1996): Krugman asserts that the concept of competitiveness is elusive or meaningless when applied to national economies (since there is no well-defined bottom line, like going out of business); for economies with little international trade, competitiveness is specifically maintained to be a funny way of saying “productivity.” Thinking and speaking in terms of competitiveness is claimed to be dangerous because it may lead to the wasteful spending of government money, as well as to trade wars and protectionism, and to the support of bad policy on a wide spectrum of important issues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiginger, K. Revisiting an Evasive Concept: Introduction to the Special Issue on Competitiveness. J Ind Compet Trade 6, 63–66 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-9471-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-9471-x

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation