Skip to main content

Market Concentration and Product Variety under Spatial Competition: Evidence from Retail Gasoline


We show that for a spatially differentiated economy reduced product variety is the likely outcome of mergers except in cases where exit costs in relation to (outlet specific) fixed costs are high. Our empirical analysis of the Austrian retail gasoline market confirms that increases in concentration reduce product variety. Ignoring this product variety effect is likely to lead to an underestimate of market power in structural merger analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Baker, J.B. and Bresnahan, T.F., “The gains from merger or collusion in product-differentiated industries,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 33(4), pp. 427–444, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S.T. and Waldfogel, J., “Do mergers increase product variety? Evidence from radio broadcasting,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 116, pp. 1009–1025, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, S. and Shepard, A., “Dynamic pricing in retail gasoline markets,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 27, pp. 429–451, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T.F., “Empirical studies of industries with market power,” in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R.D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemenz, G. and Gugler, K., “Locational choice and price competition: Some empirical results for the Austrian retail gasoline market,” Empirical Economics, pp. 1–22, Jan 2006.

  • Evans, W.N., Froeb, L.M., and Werden, G.J., “Endogeneity in the concentration–price relationship: Causes, consequences, and cures,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. XLI(4), pp. 431–438, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesove, D. and Mullin, W.P., “Testing static oligopoly models: Conduct and cost in the sugar industry, 1890–1914,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 29(2), pp. 355–377, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J.S., Monaco, K., and Rothschild, R., “Spatial price discrimination and merger: The N-firm case,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 67, pp. 672–684, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivaldi, M. and Verboven, F., “Quantifying the effects from horizontal mergers in European competition policy,” CEPR WP No. 2697, 2002.

  • Ivaldi, M., McCullock, G., and Linari, C., “US railroad mergers: A structural econometric perspective, presented at the EARIE 2002 meeting in Madrid, 2002.

  • Martinez-Giralt, X., and Neven, D., “Can price competition dominate market segmentation?,” Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 36, pp. 431–442, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netz, J.S. and Taylor, B.A., “Maximum or minimum product differentiation? Location patterns of retail outlets,” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 84, pp. 162–175, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, A., “Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry,” Econometrica, vol. 69(2), pp. 307–342, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepall, L., Richards, D.J., and Norman, G., Industrial Organization: Contemporary Theory and Practice, 2e. South-Western: Mason, Ohio, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkse, J., Slade, M.E., and Brett, C., “Spatial price competition: A semiparametric approach,” Econometrica, vol. 70(3), pp. 1111–1153, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S.C., “Monopolistic competition with outside goods,” The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, pp. 141–156, 1979.

  • Slade, M.E., “Vancouver’s gasoline-price wars: An empirical exercise in uncovering supergame strategies,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 59, pp. 257–276, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Götz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Götz, G., Gugler, K. Market Concentration and Product Variety under Spatial Competition: Evidence from Retail Gasoline. J Ind Compet Trade 6, 225–234 (2006).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


JEL Classifications