Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Urbanization effect of homogenization on ground-dwelling arachnids’ diversity in natural forest and peatland remnants

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Continuous large forests intermingled with small patches of open ecosystems (e.g. peatlands) are typical in temperate mountain regions. They are usually removed when cities are installed, but patches remain inside. Moreover, the constant growth of cities threatens the surrounding natural landscapes. Urbanization and land-use change generates degradation of natural habitats, and loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In this context, we assessed arachnid diversity in non-urban, peri-urban and urban forests and peatlands in Ushuaia city (Argentina) to evaluate the effect of urbanization in these habitats. We evaluated spider abundance, richness, Exponential of Shannon Entropy (Exp(H)), Simpson Diversity (D), similarity indices and composition. Also, we explored the association between spider assemblage, urbanization categories in each habitat type and local characteristics. We installed 115 pitfall traps, and collected 2589 individuals identified in 50 species from 14 families (including Opiliones and pseudoscorpions). Urbanization had significant effects on abundance and D in both habitat types, with higher abundances in non-urban than urban and peri-urban, and higher D in peri-urban than no-urban and intermediate values in urban. Meanwhile, richness, Exp(H) and D differed between habitats, with consistent higher values in peatlands than forests. At species level, composition was different among urbanization categories, with some species lost (species that only occur in non-urban category) and gains (species that only occur in urban and peri-urban categories). In both habitats, spider assemblages of urbanizations were better correlated with vascular plant cover, with woody debris + litter cover most significantly and positively related to spiders in non-urban forests, and bryophyte cover more related to spiders in non-urban peatlands. We conclude that urban forest fragments and peatlands were able to conserve some of the arachnid diversity characteristic of natural habitats, but homogenization mediated by urbanization exists, which could affect arachnid community functions and conservation.

Implication for insect conservation Our results show that urbanized habitats must undergo long-term monitoring, because although certain species are preserved, some specialists were present only in natural remnants, while others showed an affinity with urbanized habitats only. The species replaced due to possible inter-specific competition, niche modification, or both can lead to the impoverishment of the arachnid fauna. Therefore, urban planning should consider strategies to preserve and restore these semi-natural habitats to promote the conservation of these natural predators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achury R, Chacón de Ulloa P, Arcila A, Suarez AV (2020) Habitat disturbance modifies dominance, coexistence, and competitive interactions in tropical ant communities. Ecol Entomol 45:1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aisen S, Werenkraut V, González Márquez ME, Ramírez MJ, Ruggiero A (2017) Environmental heterogeneity, not distance, structures montane epigaeic spider assemblages in north-western Patagonia (Argentina). J Insect Conserv 21:951–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0034-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaruikka D, Kotze DJ, Matveinen K, Niemelä J (2002) Carabid beetle and spider assemblages along a forested urban-rural gradient in southern finland. J Insect Conserv 6:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argañaraz CI, Gleiser RM (2017) Does urbanization have positive or negative effects on crab spider (Araneae: Thomisidae) diversity? Zoologia 34. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.34.e19987

  • Argañaraz CI, Martínez Pastur GJ, Ramírez MJ, Grismado CJ, Blazina AP, Lencinas MV (2020a) Ground-dwelling spiders and understory vascular plants on Fuegian austral forests: community responses to variable retention management and their association to natural ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118375

  • Argañaraz CI, Rubio GD, Rubio M, Castellarini F (2020b) Ground-dwelling spiders in agroecosystems of the dry Chaco: a rapid assessment of community shifts in response to land use changes. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2020.1831605. Biodiversity

  • Avalos G, Rubio GD, Bar ME, Damborsky MP (2006) A preliminary species checklist of spider (Arachnida: Araneae) from Center North of Corrientes province, Argentina. Rev Iber Aracnol 13:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez J, Lencinas MV, Huertas Herrera A, Martínez Pastur G (2019) Assessing the conservation value of nature reserves: terrestrial birds in Isla de los Estados (Staten Island) Provincial Reserve, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Community Ecol 20:2. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.2.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitez J, Pizarro JC, Blazina AP, Lencinas MV (2021) Response of bird communities to native forest urbanization in one of the southernmost city of the world. Urban For Urban Gree 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126887

  • Blandenier G, Bruggisser OT, Rohr RP, Bersier LF (2013) Are phenological patterns of ballooning spiders linked to habitat characteristics? J Arachnol 41:126–113. https://doi.org/10.1636/P12-48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcamo JR, Contador T, Gañán M, Convey P, Kennedy J, Rozzi R (2019) Altitudinal gradients in magellanic sub-antarctic lagoons: the effect of elevation on freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and distribution. Peerj 7. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7128

  • Chao A, Chiu CH, Jost L (2014) Unifying species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional diversity, and related similarity and differentiation measures through hill numbers. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:297–324. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Ma KH, Hsieh TC, Chiu CH (2015) Online Program SpadeR (Species-richness Prediction And Diversity Estimation in R). Program and User’s Guide published at http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/

  • Chao A, Ma KH, Hsieh TC (2016) iNEXT (iNterpolation and EXTrapolation) Online: Software for Interpolation and Extrapolation of Species Diversity. Program and User’s Guide published at http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/

  • Chao A, Kubota Y, Zelený D, Chiu C-H, Li C-F, Kusumoto B et al (2020) Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages. Ecol 35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12102

  • Corcuera P, Valverde PL, Jiménez ML, Ponce-Mendoza A, De la Rosa G, Nieto G (2015) Ground spider guilds and functional diversity in native pine woodlands and eucalyptus plantations. Environ Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvv181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson JC, Butterfield J (1986) The spider communities on peat and upland grassland in northern England. Holarct Ecol 9:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2015) Statistics: An introduction Using R. Second Edition, Wiley

  • de la Delgado YA, Perry KI, Turo KJ, Parker DM, Thompson JL, Gardiner MM (2020) Local and landscape-scale environmental filters drive the functional diversity and taxonomic composition of spiders across urban greenspaces. J Appl Ecol 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13636

  • Frangi J, Richter L (1992) Los ecosistemas forestales de la Tierra del Fuego. Vida Silvestre (ICONA, España) 72 2° sem, 36–43

  • Grismado C, Ramírez MJ, Izquierdo MA (2014) “Araneae: taxonomía, diversidad y clave de identificación de familias de la Argentina” in Biodiversidad de Artrópodos Argentinos volumen 3 eds. In: Roig-Juñent S, Claps LE, Morrone JJ (eds) San Miguel de Tucumán. INSUE – UNT), Argentina, pp 55–94

    Google Scholar 

  • He C, Liu Z, Tian J, Ma Q (2014) Urban expansion dynamics and natural habitat loss in China: a multiscale landscape perspective. Glob Chang Biol 20:9. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INDEC (2010) Censo Nacional De Población, Hogares y Viviendas (2010) Documento Metodológico Preliminar. Available at: http://censo2010.indec.gov.ar/metodologia.asp. Accessed 1 Apr 2022

  • Jones EL, Leather SR (2012) Invertebrates in urban areas: a review. Eur J Entomol 109:463–478. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2012.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosten H, Clarke D (2002) Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands: background and principles including a framework for decision making. NHBS Ltd., Totnes

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps G, Martínez Pastur G, Peri PL (2012) Cambio climático en Patagonia Sur: Escenarios futuros en el manejo de los recursos naturales. Ediciones INTA, Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Lencinas MV, Martínez Pastur G, Medina M, Busso C (2005) Richness and density of birds in timber Nothofagus pumilio forests and their unproductive associated environments. Biodiv Conserv 14:2299–2320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-1665-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lencinas MV, Martínez Pastur G, Anderson CB, Busso C (2008a) The value of timber quality forests for insect conservation on Tierra del Fuego Island compared to associated non-timber quality stands. J Ins Conserv 12:461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9079-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lencinas MV, Martínez Pastur G, Rivero P, Busso C (2008b) Conservation value of timber quality versus associated non-timber quality stands for understory diversity in Nothofagus forests. Biod Conserv 17:2579–2597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9323-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lencinas MV, Martínez Pastur G, Gallo E, Cellini JM (2014) Decreasing negative impacts of harvesting over insect communities using variable retention in southern Patagonian forests. J Insect Conserv 18:479–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9661-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lencinas MV, Kreps G, Soler R, Peri PL, Porta A, Ramírez M, Martínez Pastur G (2015) Neochelanops michaelseni (Pseudoscorpiones: Chernetidae) as a potential bioindicator in managed and unmanaged Nothofagus forest of Tierra del Fuego. J Arachnol 43:406?412. https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202-43.3.406

  • Lencinas MV, Sola FJ, Martínez Pastur G (2017) Variable retention effects on vascular plants and beetles along a regional gradient in Nothofagus pumilio forests. For Ecol Manage 406:251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lencinas MV, Sola FJ, Cellini JM, Peri PL, Martínez Pastur GJ (2019) Land sharing in South Patagonia: conservation of above-ground beetle diversity in forests and non-forest ecosystems. Sci Total Environ 690:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • León CA, Gabriel M, Rodríguez C, Iturraspe R, Savoretti A, Pancotto V et al(2021) Peatlands of Southern South America: a review. Mires and Peat 27:3. https://doi.org/0.19189/MaP.2020.SNPG.StA.2021

  • Lepczyk CA, Aronson MFJ, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS (2017) Biodiversity in the City: fundamental questions for understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation. Bioscience 67:9. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons A, Ashton PA, Powell I, Oxbrough A (2018) Epigeal spider assemblage responses to vegetation structure under contrasting grazing management in upland calcareous grasslands. Insect Conserv Divers 11. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12287

  • Magura T, Horváth R, Tóthmérész B (2010) Effects of urbanization on ground-dwelling spiders in forest patches, in Hungary. Landsc Ecol 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9445-6

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Springer Dordrecht, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Pastur GJ, Cellini JM, Lencinas MV, Barrera M, Peri PL (2011) Environmental variables influencing regeneration of Nothofagus pumilio in system with combined aggregated and dispersed retention. For Ecol Manage 261:178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellinger RL, Braschler B, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2018) Diverse effects of degree of urbanisation and forest size on species richness and functional diversity of plants, and ground surface-active ants and spiders. PLoS ONE 13:6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore DM (1983) Flora of Tierra del Fuego. Anthony Nelson, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreika N, Pajunen T, Kotze DJ (2015) Urban mires as hotspots of epigaeic arthropod diversity. Biodivers Conserv 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0990-9

  • Olden JD, Poff NL (2004) Ecological processes driving biotic homogenization: testing a mechanistic model using fish faunas. Ecology 85:1867–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto C, Svensson BS (1982) Structure of communities of ground-living spider along altitudinal gradients. Holarct Ecol 5:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng MH, Hung YC, Liu KL, Neoh KB (2020) Landscape configuration and habitat complexity shape arthropod assemblage in urban parks. Sci Rep 10:16043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73121-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rahbek C (2005) The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecol Lett 8:224–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00701.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sola FJ, Peri PL, Huertas L, Martínez Pastur GJ, Lencinas MV (2016) Above-ground arthropod community structure and influence of structural-retention management in southern Patagonian scrublands, Argentina. J Insect Conserv 20:929–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9918-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler R, Benítez J, Sola F, Lencinas MV(2022) Biodiversity Islands at the World’s Southernmost City: Plant, Bird and Insect Conservation in Urban Forests and Peatlands of Ushuaia, Argentina. In: Montagnini, F. (Ed.). Biodiversity Islands: Pockets of Protected Land in Human Dominated Environments. Springer. 709 pp

  • Stendera SES, Johnson RK (2005) Additive partitioning of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple spatial scales. Freshw Biol 50:1360–1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01403.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajthi B, Horváth R, Mizser Sz, Nagy DD, Tóthmérész B (2017) Spider assemblages in floodplain forests along an urbanization gradient. Community Ecol 18:3. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.3.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, He Q, Liu X, Zhuang Y, Hong S (2011) Global urbanization research from 1991 to 2009: a systematic research review. Landsc Urban Plan 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.006

  • Zhang D, Huang Q, He C, Wu J (2017) Impacts of urban expansion on ecosystem services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China: a scenario analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.003. Resour Conserv Recy 125

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Martín Ramírez and Abel Pérez González for their help during arachnid determinations.

Funding

This work was conducted with funds provided by PICT2016–1968, from ANPCyT-Argentina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC CONICET), Houssay 200 (9410), Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina

    C. I. Argañaraz, J. Benitez, R. Soler & M. V. Lencinas

  2. Instituto de Ciencias Polares, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (ICPA), Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego (UNTDF), Fuegia Basket 251 (9410), Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina

    F. Sola

Authors
  1. C. I. Argañaraz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Benitez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Soler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Sola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. V. Lencinas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CIA: processed and analyzed the arachnid data, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, reviewed and edited the manuscript. JB, RS and FS: conceived the project, collected the data, critically read the manuscript. MVL: conceived the project, obtained the funds, supervised the project, drafted and refined the manuscript. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. I. Argañaraz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Argañaraz, C.I., Benitez, J., Soler, R. et al. Urbanization effect of homogenization on ground-dwelling arachnids’ diversity in natural forest and peatland remnants. J Insect Conserv 27, 283–294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00453-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00453-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation