Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can cattle grazing benefit grassland butterflies?

  • REVIEW PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grassland insects face some of the most severe declines in species diversity and total abundance, in part due to agriculture. Livestock grazing is the largest agricultural land use and can have both positive and negative effects on insect communities and populations. A global synthesis is needed to guide butterfly conservation and provide recommendations for scientists, managers, and other stakeholders seeking to use grazing as a tool for butterfly conservation. Here I review 115 studies that evaluate how cattle grazing affects butterfly communities and species. I discuss how various aspects of cattle grazing affect butterfly community and species responses. Thirty-five studies concluded cattle grazing has positive effects on butterflies, while 20 concluded cattle grazing has negative effects. Thirty-six were inconclusive or found no effect of grazing. Conclusions depended heavily on the management chosen as well as environmental and evolutionary factors. Eighty-five studies (74%) were located in Europe, providing a useful framework for the rest of the world, but also creating opportunities for further research.

Implications for practice

Low to moderate grazing intensity is the most beneficial grazing management strategy for butterflies. There is also potential for rotational grazing to provide benefits, but more research is needed. It is important to have variation in grazing management and other disturbance types in the landscape (mowing, prescribed fire, etc.) to accommodate differing habitat needs of butterfly species. Cattle grazing has potential as a land-sharing opportunity to promote grassland butterfly diversity in agroecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

List of studies and relevant information will be made available.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Akite P (2008) Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the diversity and composition of the butterfly fauna of sites in the Sango Bay and Iriiri areas, Uganda: implications for conservation. Afr J Ecol 46:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer O, Erhardt A (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for central european butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conserv Biol 14:746–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard JL (2020) The bison and the cow: food, empire, extinction. Am Q 72:377–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry S, Huntsinger L (2021) Rangeland Land-Sharing, Livestock Grazing’s Role in the Conservation of Imperiled Species. Sustainability 13:4466

  • Bartoňová A, Kolář V, Marešová J, Šašić M, Šlancarová J, Sucháček P, Konvička M (2017) Isolated Asian steppe element in the Balkans: habitats of Proterebia afra (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and associated butterfly communities. J Insect Conserv 21:559–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Örvössy N, Kėrösi A, Nagy M, Peregovits L (2007) Microhabitat preferences of Maculinea teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur J Entomol 104:731–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck JJ, Hernández DL, Pasari JR, Zavaleta ES (2015) Grazing maintains native plant diversity and promotes community stability in an annual grassland. Ecol Appl 25:1259–1270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bendel CR, Hovick TJ, Limb RF, Harmon JP (2018) Variation in grazing management practices supports diverse butterfly communities across grassland working landscapes. J Insect Conserv 22:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg Å, Ahrné K, Öckinger E, Svensson R, Wissman J (2013) Butterflies in semi-natural pastures and power-line corridors—effects of flower richness, management, and structural vegetation characteristics. Insect Conserv Divers 6:639–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet K, Moechnig H, DeJong-Hughes J (2000) Grazing systems planning guide. University of Minnesota Extension Service, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF (2004) Avian habitat evaluation: should counting birds count? Front Ecol Environ 2:403–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonari G, Fajmon K, Malenovský I, Zelený D, Holuša J, Jongepierová I, Kočárek P, Konvička O, Uřičář J, Chytrý M (2017) Management of semi-natural grasslands benefiting both plant and insect diversity: the importance of heterogeneity and tradition. Agric Ecosyst Environ 246:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonte D, Maes D (2008) Trampling affects the distribution of specialised coastal dune arthropods. Basic Appl Ecol 9:726–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Börschig C, Klein A-M, von Wehrden H, Krauss J (2013) Traits of butterfly communities change from specialist to generalist characteristics with increasing land-use intensity. Basic Appl Ecol 14:547–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton TM, Warren MS, Roy DB, Stewart K (2008) The changing status of the Chalkhill blue butterfly Polyommatus coridon in the UK: the impacts of conservation policies and environmental factors. J Insect Conserv 12:629–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubová T, Vrabec V, Kulma M, Nowicki P (2015) Land management impacts on European butterflies of conservation concern: a review. J Insect Conserv 19:805–821

  • Caven AJ, King KC, Wiese JD, Brinley Buckley EM (2017) A descriptive analysis of regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) habitat utilizing biological monitoring data along the big bend of the Platte River, NE. J Insect Conserv 21:183–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen HD, Holbeck HB, Reddersen J (2001) Factors influencing abundance of butterflies and burnet moths in the uncultivated habitats of an organic farm in Denmark. Biol Cons 98:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole LJ, Brocklehurst S, Robertson D, Harrison W, McCracken DI (2015) Riparian buffer strips: their role in the conservation of insect pollinators in intensive grassland systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 211:207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzi G, Müller CB, Krauss J (2008) How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands? Landscape Ecol 23:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross DT (2020) Farming animals reduces biodiversity and threatens our health. Sustainability Times. Accessed 20 Nov 2021

  • D’Aniello B, Stanislao I, Bonelli S, Balletto E (2011) Haying and grazing effects on the butterfly communities of two Mediterranean-area grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 20:1731–1744

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot M, Rebeusek F, Grobelnik V, Govedic M, Salamun A, Verovnik R (2009) Distribution modelling as an approach to the conservation of a threatened alpine endemic butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). European Journal of Entomology 106:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kort H, Prunier JG, Tessier M, Turlure C, Baguette M, Stevens VM (2018) Interacting grassland species under threat of multiple global change drivers. J Biogeogr 45:2133–2145

    Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Moranz RA, Delaney JT, Miller JR, Engle DM, Winkler LB, McGranahan DA, Barney RJ, Trager JC, Stephenson AL, Gillespie MK (2011) A cross-taxonomic comparison of insect responses to grassland management and land-use legacies. Ecosphere 2:art131

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney JT, Moranz RA, Debinski DM, Engle DM, Miller JR (2016) Exotic-dominated grasslands show signs of recovery with cattle grazing and fire. Plos One 11:e0165758

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierks A, Fischer K (2009) Habitat requirements and niche selection of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within a large sympatric metapopulation. Biodivers Conserv 18:3663–3676

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Geyer A (1997) Influence of management on butterflies of rare grassland ecosystems in Germany. J Insect Conserv 1:125–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover JW, Rescia A, Fungariño S, Fairburn J, Carey P, Lunt P, Arnot C, Dennis RLH, Dover CJ (2011) Land-use, environment, and their impact on butterfly populations in a mountainous pastoral landscape: species richness and family-level abundance. J Insect Conserv 15:523–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont B, Farruggia A, Garel JP, Bachelard P, Boitier E, Frain M (2009) How does grazing intensity influence the diversity of plants and insects in a species-rich upland grassland on basalt soils? Grass Forage Sci 64:92–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehl S, Böhm N, Wörner M, Rákosy L, Schmitt T (2019) Dispersal and adaptation strategies of the high mountain butterfly Boloria pales in the Romanian Carpathians. Front Zool 16:1

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eichel S, Fartmann T (2008) Management of calcareous grasslands for Nickerl’s fritillary (Melitaea aurelia) has to consider habitat requirements of the immature stages, isolation, and patch area. J Insect Conserv 12:677–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Elligsen H, Beinlich B, Plachter H (1997) Effects of large-scale cattle grazing on populations of Coenonympha glycerion and Lasiommata megera (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). J Insect Conserv 1:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer A, Lane J, Summerville KS, Lown L (2012) Does low-density grazing affect butterfly (Lepidoptera) colonization of a previously flooded tallgrass prairie reconstruction? Great Lakes Entomologist 45:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwell SL, Griswold T, Elle E (2016) Habitat type plays a greater role than livestock grazing in structuring shrubsteppe plant–pollinator communities. J Insect Conserv 20:515–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Farruggia A, Dumont B, Scohier A, Leroy T, Pradel P, Garel JP (2012) An alternative rotational stocking management designed to favour butterflies in permanent grasslands. Grass Forage Sci 67:136–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T (2006) Oviposition preferences, adjacency of old woodland and isolation explain the distribution of the Duke of Burgundy butterfly (Hamearis lucina) in calcareous grasslands in central Germany. Ann Zool Fenn 43:335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K, Wrbka T, Dullinger S (2017) Pluralism in grassland management promotes butterfly diversity in a large Central European conservation area. J Insect Conserv 21:277–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischner TL (1994) Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western north america. Conserv Biol 8:629–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade Y, Öckinger E (2017) Host plant density and patch isolation drive occupancy and abundance at a butterfly’s northern range margin. Ecol Evol 7:331–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franzén M, Nilsson SG (2008) How can we preserve and restore species richness of pollinating insects on agricultural land? Ecography 31:698–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser MD, Moorby JM, Vale JE, Evans DM (2014) Mixed grazing systems benefit both upland biodiversity and livestock production. Plos One 9:e89054

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2001) Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. Bioscience 51:625

    Google Scholar 

  • Galetti M, Moleón M, Jordano P, Pires MM, Guimarães PR, Pape T, Nichols E, Hansen D, Olesen JM, Munk M, de Mattos JS, Schweiger AH, Owen-Smith N, Johnson CN, Marquis RJ, Svenning J-C (2018) Ecological and evolutionary legacy of megafauna extinctions. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 93:845–862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner AJ, Ried RS, Kiema S (2005) Impact of land-use on butterflies in Southwestern Burkina Faso. Afr Entomol 13:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffart P, Schtickzelle N, Turlure C (2010) Conservation and management of the habitats of two relict butterflies in the Belgian Ardenne: Proclossiana eunomia and Lycaena helle. In: Habel JC, Assmann T (eds) Relict species. Springer, Berlin, pp 357–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough AE, Sharp MH (2016) Managing calcareous grassland for the declining Duke of Burgundy Hamearis lucina butterfly: effects of grazing management on Primula host plants. J Insect Conserv 20:1087–1098

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grill A, Cleary DFR (2003) Diversity patterns in butterfly communities of the Greek nature reserve Dadia. Biol Cons 114:427–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1973) Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. J Environ Manage 1:151–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SJG, Bunce RGH (2019) The use of cattle Bos taurus for restoring and maintaining holarctic landscapes: conclusions from a long-term study (1946–2017) in northern England. Ecol Evol 9:5859–5869

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E, Siepel H, Hofland N, Schwan H, Stenmans W, Müller A, Sumser H, Hörren T, Goulson D (2017) More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLOS ONE 12(10):e0185809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809

  • Hodgson JA, Kunin WE, Thomas CD, Benton TG, Gabriel D (2010) Comparing organic farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett 13:1358–1367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle M, James M (2005) Global warming, human population pressure, and viability of the world’s smallest butterfly. Conserv Biol 19:1113–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerrentrup JS, Wrage-Mönnig N, Röver K-U, Isselstein J (2014) Grazing intensity affects insect diversity via sward structure and heterogeneity in a long-term experiment. J Appl Ecol 51:968–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerrentrup JS, Klimek S, Marchiori E, Bittante G, Ramanzin M, Sturaro E, Marini L (2016) Impact of dairy farming on butterfly diversity in Alpine summer pastures. Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson V, Knape J, Franzén M (2017) Population dynamics and future persistence of the clouded Apollo butterfly in southern Scandinavia: The importance of low intensity grazing and creation of habitat patches. Biol Cons 206:120–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson V, Kindvall O, Askling J, Franzén M (2019) Intense grazing of calcareous grasslands has negative consequences for the threatened marsh fritillary butterfly. Biol Conserv 239:108280

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson V, Kindvall O, Askling J, Franzén M (2020) Extreme weather affects colonization–extinction dynamics and the persistence of a threatened butterfly. J Appl Ecol 57:1068–1077

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CN (2009) Ecological consequences of late quaternary extinctions of megafauna. Proc Biol Sci 276:2509–2519

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Drechsler M, Mewes M, Sturm A, Wätzold F (2015) A novel modeling approach to evaluate the ecological effects of timing and location of grassland conservation measures. Biol Conserv 182:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert-van der Merwe L, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2019) Well-managed grassland heterogeneity promotes butterfly conservation in a corridor network. J Environ Manage 238:382–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juan-Baeza I, Martínez-Garza C, Del-Val E (2015) Recovering more than tree cover: herbivores and herbivory in a restored tropical dry forest. Plos One 10:e0128583

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kati V, Zografou K, Tzirkalli E, Chitos T, Willemse L (2012) Butterfly and grasshopper diversity patterns in humid Mediterranean grasslands: the roles of disturbance and environmental factors. J Insect Conserv 16:807–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Sugar A, Packer L (2000) Indicator Taxa Rapid Biodiversity Assessment and Nestedness in an Endangered Ecosystem. Conserv Biol 14(6):1726–34 

  • Konvicka M, Benes J, Cizek O, Kopecek F, Konvicka O, Vitaz L (2008) How too much care kills species: grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold. J Insect Conserv 12:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvička M, Ričl D, Vodičková V, Beneš J, Jirků M (2021) Restoring a butterfly hot spot by large ungulates refaunation: the case of the Milovice military training range, Czech Republic. BMC Ecol Evol 21:73

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kormann UG, Scherber C, Tscharntke T, Batáry P, Rösch V (2019) Connectedness of habitat fragments boosts conservation benefits for butterflies, but only in landscapes with little cropland. Landsc Ecol 34:1045–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Landscape occupancy and local population size depends on host plant distribution in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Biol Cons 120:355–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002a) Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity. Biol Conserv 106:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002b) Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies, and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv Biol 16:1570–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse M, Stein-Bachinger K, Gottwald F, Schmidt E, Heinken T (2016) Influence of grassland management on the biodiversity of plants and butterflies on organic suckler cow farms. Tuexenis 36:97–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari M, Heliölä J, Pöyry J, Saarinen K (2007) Contrasting trends of butterfly species preferring semi-natural grasslands, field margins and forest edges in northern Europe. J Insect Conserv 11:351–366

    Google Scholar 

  • León-Cortés JL, Pérez-Espinoza F, Marín L, Molina-Martínez A (2004) Complex habitat requirements and conservation needs of the only extant Baroniinae swallowtail butterfly. Animal Conserv 7:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT, Hurford C (1997) Assessing the status of the marsh fritillary butterfly (Eurodryas aurinia): an example from Glamorgan, UK. J Insect Conserv 1:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Loos J, Vizauer T-C, Kastal A, Davies M, Hedrich H, Dolek M (2020) A highly endangered species on the edge: distribution, habitat use and outlook for Colias myrmidone in newly established Natura 2000 areas in Romania. Environ, Dev Sustain 22:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald MA, Cobbold G, Mathews F, Denny MJH, Walker LK, Grice PV, Anderson GQA (2012) Effects of agri-environment management for cirl buntings on other biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 21:1477–1492

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley WA, Hart RH, Samuel MJ, Smith MA, Waggoner JW, Manley JT (1997) Vegetation, cattle, and economic responses to grazing strategies and pressures. J Range Manag 50:638

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschalek DA, Faulkner DK, Deutschman DH (2017) Livestock grazing shapes the vegetation structure and subsequent habitat use by the endangered skipper Pyrgus ruralis lagunae (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Environ Entomol 46:445–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazalova M, Sipos J, Rada S, Kasak J, Sarapatka B, Kuras T (2015) Responses of grassland arthropods to various biodiversity-friendly management practices: Is there a compromise? Eur J Entomol 112:734–746

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough K, Albanese G, Haukos DA, Ricketts AM, Stratton S (2019) Management regime and habitat response influence abundance of regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) in tallgrass prairie. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S, Hobbs R (1999) A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conserv Biol 13:1282–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P, Bergman K-O, Cronvall E, Eriksson ÅI, Glimskär A, Islamovic A, Jonason D, Löfqvist Z, Westerberg L (2016) Flower abundance and vegetation height as predictors for nectar-feeding insect occurrence in Swedish semi-natural grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1988) A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure. Am Nat 132:87–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Moranz RA, Debinski DM, McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Miller JR (2012) Untangling the effects of fire, grazing, and land-use legacies on grassland butterfly communities. Biodivers Conserv 21:2719–2746

    Google Scholar 

  • Moranz RA, Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2014) Making sense of a prairie butterfly paradox: the effects of grazing, time since fire, and sampling period on regal fritillary abundance. Biol Conserv 173:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschetti M, Besnard A, Couturier T, Fonderflick J (2020) Grazing intensity negatively affects the maintenance of Gentiana pneumonanthe and the survival of Phengaris alcon egg-laying. J Insect Conserv 24:343–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Belrose V, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Clarke RT, Hochberg ME (2005) Conserving community modules: a case study of the endangered lycaenid butterfly Maculinea alcon. Ecology 86:3160–3173

    Google Scholar 

  • Munguira ML, Barea-Azcón JM, Castro-Cobo S, García-Barros E, Miteva S, Olivares J, Romo H (2017) Ecology and recovery plans for the four Spanish endangered endemic butterfly species. J Insect Conserv 21:423–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata K, Matsuura A (2013) Effect of grazing intensity on the interaction between Shijimiaeoides divinus asonis (Matsumura, 1929) and its attendant ants. Entomol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson SG, Franzén M, Jönsson E (2008) Long-term land-use changes and extinction of specialised butterflies. Insect Conserv Divers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00027.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1994) Cows and conservation biology. Conserv Biol 8:613–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Eriksson AK, Smith HG (2006) Effects of grassland abandonment, restoration and management on butterflies and vascular plants. Biol Cons 133:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden S, Haukos DA, Olson K, Lemmon J, Alexander J, Gatson GA, Fick WH (2019) Grassland bird and butterfly responses to sericea lespedeza control via late-season grazing pressure. Am Midl Nat 181:147

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouin A, Aviron S, Dover J, Burel F (2004) Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:473–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Sánchez AJ, Schibalski A, Schröder B, Klimek S, Dauber J (2020) Disentangling the effects of host resources, local, and landscape variables on the occurrence pattern of the dusky large blue butterfly (Phengaris nausithous) in upland grasslands. J Insect Conserv 24:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol Conserv 12(2) 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(77)90065-9

  • Potts SG, Woodcock BA, Roberts SPM, Tscheulin T, Pilgrim ES, Brown VK, Tallowin JR (2009) Enhancing pollinator biodiversity in intensive grasslands. J Appl Ecol 46:369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2004) Restoration of butterfly and moth communities in semi-natural grasslands by cattle grazing. Ecol Appl 14:1656–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2005) Responses of butterfly and moth species to restored cattle grazing in semi-natural grasslands. Biol Conserv 122:465–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry J, Luoto M, Paukkunen J, Pykälä J, Raatikainen K, Kuussaari M (2006) Different responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient of vegetation height: an indicator of the vertebrate grazing intensity and successional age. Oikos 115:401–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry J, Paukkunen J, Heliölä J, Kuussaari M (2009) Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and total density of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 160:577–587

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Roets F, Samways MJ (2016) Wild herbivore grazing enhances insect diversity over livestock grazing in an African grassland system. Plos One 11:e0164198

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS, Stewart GB (2006) Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 20:1647–1656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetto Enri S, Probo M, Farruggia A, Lanore L, Blanchetete A, Dumont B (2017) A biodiversity-friendly rotational grazing system enhancing flower-visiting insect assemblages while maintaining animal and grassland productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 241:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen K, Jantunen J (2005) Grassland butterfly fauna under traditional animal husbandry: contrasts in diversity in mown meadows and grazed pastures. Biodivers Conserv 14:3201–3213

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2016) Large-scale ecological networks do work in an ecologically complex biodiversity hotspot. Ambio 45:161–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford MP (2011) Improving conservation and management of the imperiled carson valley silverpot butterfly Speyeria nokomis carsonensis (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on rapid assessments of distribution, habitat, and threats. J Insect Conserv 15:715–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2004) Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS. Oikos 104:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Turlure C, Baguette M (2007) Grazing management impacts on the viability of the threatened bog fritillary butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Biol Conserv 136:651–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CB, Haddad NM, Henry EH, Crone EE (2019) Movement and Demography of At-Risk Butterflies: Building Blocks for Conservation. Annu Rev Entomol 64:167–184

  • Schwarz C, Fartmann T (2021) Conservation of a strongly declining butterfly species depends on traditionally managed grasslands. J Insect Conserv 25:255–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Science for Environment Policy (2017) Agri-environment schemes: impacts on the agricultural environment. European Commission DG Environment, Science Communication Unit

  • Seibold S, Gossner MM, Simons NK, Blüthgen N, Müller J, Ambarlı D, Ammer C, Bauhus J, Fischer M, Habel JC, Linsenmair KE, Nauss T, Penone C, Prati D, Schall P, Schulze E-D, Vogt J, Wöllauer S, Weisser WW (2019) Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574:671–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapira T, Henkin Z, Dag A, Mandelik Y (2020) Rangeland sharing by cattle and bees: moderate grazing does not impair bee communities and resource availability. Ecol Appl 30:e02066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sjödin NE, Bengtsson J, Ekbom B (2008) The influence of grazing intensity and landscape composition on the diversity and abundance of flower-visiting insects. J Appl Ecol 45:763–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaer MJ, Graydon DJ, Cushman JH (2013) Community-level consequences of cattle grazing for an invaded grassland: variable responses of native and exotic vegetation. J Veg Sci 24:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Smee M, Smyth W, Tunmore M, Ffrench-Constant R, Hodgson D (2011) Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England. J Insect Conserv 15:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LM, Cherry R (2014) Effects of management techniques on grassland butterfly species composition and community structure. Am Midl Nat 172:227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskär A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodivers Conserv 10:1839–1863

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer L, Benes J, Dandova J, Jaskova V, Konvicka M (2009) The large blue butterfly, Phengaris [Maculinea] arion, as a conservation umbrella on a landscape scale: the case of the Czech Carpathians. Ecol Ind 9:1056–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuhldreher G, Fartmann T (2014) When habitat management can be a bad thing: effects of habitat quality, isolation and climate on a declining grassland butterfly. J Insect Conserv 18:965–979

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel AB (1998) Effects of management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens. Biol Cons 83:77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A (2001) A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodivers Conserv 10:1141–1169

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2001a) A ten-year study to monitor populations of the regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia, (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Wisconsin, U.S.A. Gt Lakes Entomol 34:97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A, Swengel S (2001b) Effects of prairie and barrens management on butterfly faunal composition. Biodivers Conserv 10:1757–1785

    Google Scholar 

  • Szentirmai I, Mesterházy A, Varga I, Schubert Z, Sándor LC, Ábrahám L, Kőrösi Á (2014) Habitat use and population biology of the Danube clouded yellow butterfly Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Romania. J Insect Conserv 18:417–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science 325:80–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Food and Agriculture Administration (2012) LIVESTOCK AND LANDSCAPE. https://www.fao.org/3/ar591e/ar591e.pdf. Accessed 15 Jun 2021

  • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (2021) Easements|NRCS. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/easements/. Accessed 27 Jul 2021

  • Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildl Manag 47:893–901

    Google Scholar 

  • van Klink R, van der Plas F, van Noordwijk CGET, WallisDeVries MF, Olff H (2015) Effects of large herbivores on grassland arthropod diversity. Biol Rev 90:347–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Klink R, Nolte S, Mandema FS, Lagendijk DDG, WallisDeVries MF, Bakker JP, Esselink P, Smit C (2016) Effects of grazing management on biodiversity across trophic levels–the importance of livestock species and stocking density in salt marshes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:329–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessby K, Söderström B, Glimskär A, Svensson B (2002) Species-richness correlations of six different taxa in swedish seminatural grasslands. Conserv Biol 16:430–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JA, Debinski DM, Koford RR, Miller JR (2007) Butterfly responses to prairie restoration through fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 140:78–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DL (2020) Insect declines in the anthropocene. Annu Rev Entomol 65:457–480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis De Vries MF, Parkinson AE, Dulphy JP, Sayer M, Diana E (2007) Effects of livestock breed and grazing intensity on biodiversity and production in grazing systems. 4. Effects on animal diversity. Grass Forage Sci 62:185–197

    Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries M (2004) A quantitative conservation approach for the endangered butterfly Maculinea alcon. Conserv Biol 18:489–499

    Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, Raemakers I (2001) Does extensive grazing benefit butterflies in coastal dunes? Restor Ecol 9:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • WallisDeVries MF, Noordijk J, Colijn EO, Smit JT, Veling K (2016) Contrasting responses of insect communities to grazing intensity in lowland heathlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 234:72–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chen J, Liu W, Xu R (2007) Effect of cultivating croplands and grazing in aridgrassland habitats on the conservation of melitaeinebutterflies in a mountainous area in Northern China. Sci China, Ser C: Life Sci 50:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Wätzold F, Drechsler M, Johst K, Mewes M, Sturm A (2016) A novel, spatiotemporally explicit ecological-economic modeling procedure for the design of cost-effective agri-environment schemes to conserve biodiversity. Am J Agric Econ 98:489–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss SB (1999) Cars, cows, and checkerspot butterflies: nitrogen deposition and management of nutrient-poor grasslands for a threatened species. Conserv Biol 13:1476–1486

    Google Scholar 

  • Weking S, Hermann G, Fartmann T (2013) Effects of mire type, land use and climate on a strongly declining wetland butterfly. J Insect Conserv 17:1081–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin A, Lennartsson T, Björklund J-O (2018) The historical ecology approach in species conservation–identifying suitable habitat management for the endangered clouded Apollo butterfly (Parnassius mnemosyne L.) in Sweden. AIMS Environ Sci 5:244–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein W, Schmid B (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. J Appl Ecol 36:363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson ML, Roche LM, Young TP (2013) Indirect effects of domestic and wild herbivores on butterflies in an African savanna. Ecol Evol 3:3672–3682

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA, Potts SG, Tscheulin T, Pilgrim E, Ramsey AJ, Harrison-Cripps J, Brown VK, Tallowin JR (2009) Responses of invertebrate trophic level, feeding guild and body size to the management of improved grassland field margins. J Appl Ecol 46:920–929

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, Mortimer SR, Brereton T, Redhead JW, Thomas JA, Pywell RF (2012) Identifying time lags in the restoration of grassland butterfly communities: a multi-site assessment. Biol Conserv 155:50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA, Savage J, Bullock JM, Nowakowski M, Orr R, Tallowin JRB, Pywell RF (2014) Enhancing floral resources for pollinators in productive agricultural grasslands. Biol Conserv 171:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakkak S, Chatzaki M, Karamalis N, Kati V (2014) Spiders in the context of agricultural land abandonment in Greek Mountains: species responses, community structure and the need to preserve traditional agricultural landscapes. J Insect Conserv 18:599–611

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Cheryl B. Schultz, Sarah Hamman, and Kelsey C. King for valuable discussions and helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Funding provided by WSU CEREO, USDA Western SARE, and CREOi was critical to the completion of this work.

Funding

This work was funded by Washington State University Center for Environmental Research, Education, and Outreach (CEREO), U.S. Department of Agriculture Western Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE), and Conservation, Research and Education Opportunities International (CREOi).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: review conception, literature review, interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha K. Bussan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author certifies that there are no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 84 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bussan, S.K. Can cattle grazing benefit grassland butterflies?. J Insect Conserv 26, 359–374 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00373-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-022-00373-8

Keywords

Navigation