Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation value of secondary forest habitats to endemic frugivorous butterflies at Mount Kanlaon, Negros Occidental, Philippines

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Throughout Southeast Asia, removal of old growth forests coincides with rapid expansion of secondary forest landcover. Increasing evidence suggests that secondary forests can contribute to conservation of forest species. The effects of deforestation and subsequent reforestation by secondary vegetation on forest biotas vary geographically, and local data are needed to understand the potential role such forests may play in conservation. In the Philippine Archipelago, a globally distinct biota is coupled with severe deforestation. Focusing solely on old growth forest preservation may no longer be a feasible strategy of achieving conservation goals on islands that have lost the majority of old growth tracts. The potential of Philippine secondary forests to provide habitat for the endemic component of animal communities is not well known. We studied frugivorous butterflies, a common indicator taxon, at a limited spatial scale in Mount Kanlaon Natural Park, Negros Occidental, Philippines. We compared the butterfly communities of three contiguous forest types across a small spatial scale: disturbed secondary forest, regenerating secondary forest, and old growth forest. Hierarchical cluster analysis and NMDS ordination indicated high similarity between communities, though the close proximity of sampling areas may have influenced this similarity. Significant differences between secondary and old growth sites were detected by permutational MANOVA. Endemic butterfly species were abundant in both secondary forest types, and some endemic species were significantly more abundant in secondary forests compared to old growth. These results indicate endemic frugivorous butterflies utilize regenerating habitats at close proximity to intact forest, and provide evidence that secondary forests in the Philippines can contribute to the conservation of endemic components of butterfly communities. However, further study is needed to fully characterize the contribution of regenerating forests, broadly, to conservation strategies in the Philippines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bankoff G (2007) One island too many: reappraising the extent of deforestation in the Philippines prior to 1946. J Histor Geogr 33:314–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Mestre LAM, Gardner TA, Peres CA (2007) The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for Amazonian birds. Biol Conserv 136:212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedick S, Hill JK, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Maryati M, Searle JB, Schilthuizen M, Hamer KC (2006) Impacts of rain forest fragmentation on butterflies in northern Borneo: Species richness, turnover and the value of small fragments. J Appl Ecol 43:967–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen ME, McAlpine CA, House APN, Smith GC (2007) Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: a review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biol Conserv 140:273–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks TM, Evans TD, Dutson GCL, Anderson GQA, Asane DC, Timmins RJ, Toledo AG (1992) The conservation status of the birds of Negros, Philippines. Bird Conserv Int 2:273–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E6089–E6096

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charrette NA, Cleary DFR, Mooers AO (2006) Range-restricted, specialist Bornean butterflies are less likely to recover from ENSO-induced disturbance. Ecology 9:2330–2337

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Peres CA, Dent D, Sheil D, Lugo AE, Lamb D, Stork NE, Miller SE (2009) The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conserv Biol 23:1406–1417

    Google Scholar 

  • Chokkalingam U, de Jong W (2001) Secondary forest: a working definition and typology. Int Forest Rev 3:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent DH, Wright SJ (2009) The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biol Conserv 142:2833–2843

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E, Wikramanajake ED, Forney M (1995) Conserving the reservoirs and remnants of tropical moist forest in the Indo-Pacific region. In: Primack RB, Lovejoy TE (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of southeast asian rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 140–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumbrell AJ, Hill JK (2005) Impacts of selective logging on canopy and ground assemblages of tropical forest butterflies: implications for sampling. Biol Conserv 125:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn RR (2004) Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration. Conserv Biol 18:302–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermon H, Waltert M, Vane-Wright RI, Muhlenberg M (2005) Forest use and vertical stratification in fruit-feeding butterflies of Sulawesi, Indonesia: impacts for conservation. Biodiversity Conserv 14:333–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldsa J (1999) The impact of human forest disturbance on the endemic avifauna of the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Bird Conserv Int 9:47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Management Bureau (FMB) (2010) Forestry Statistics 2010. Philippines Forest Management Bureau. https://forestry.denr.gov.ph/index.php/statistics/forest-cover. Accessed 27 April 2018

  • Fountain-Jones NM, Jordan GJ, Baker TP, Balmer JM, Wardlaw T, Baker SC (2015) Living near the edge: being close to mature forest increases the rate of succession in beetle communities. Ecol Appl 25:800–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP, Kummer DM, Guiang ES (1993) The upland ecosystem in the Philippines: alternatives for sustainable farming and forestry. In: Agricultural sustainability and the environment in the humid tropics. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC

  • Ghazoul J (2002) Impact of logging on the richness and diversity of forest butterflies in a tropical dry forest in Thailand. Biodiversity Conserv 11:521–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Giam X (2017) Global biodiversity loss from deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:5775–5777

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA, Bradshaw CJA, Lovejoy LWF (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378–381

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2011) Estimating species richness. In: Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 39–54

  • Hamer KC, Hill JK (2000) Scale-dependent effects of habitat disturbance on species richness in tropical forests. Conserv Biol 14:1435–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer KC, Hill JK, Lace LA, Langan AM (1997) Ecological and biogeographical effects of forest disturbance on tropical butterflies of Sumba, Indonesia. J Biogeogr 24:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann A, Barbon EB, Curio E, Madulid DE (1999) A botanical inventory of a submontane tropical rainforest on Negros Island, Philippines. Biodiversity Conserv 8:1017–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaney LR, Regaldo JC (1998) Vanishing treasures of the Philippine rainforest. The Field Museum, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Hamer KC (2004) Determining impacts of habitat modification on diversity of tropical forest fauna: the importance of spatial scale. J Appl Ecol 41:744–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Hamer KC, Lace LA, Banham WMT (1995) Effects of selective logging on tropical forest butterflies on Buru, Indonesia. J Appl Ecol 32:754–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: an R package for interpolation and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Meth Ecol Evol 7:1451–1456

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2010) Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 8.1. IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee

  • Jones MJ, Sullivan MS, Marsden SJ, Linsley MD (2001) Correlates of extinction risk of birds from two Indonesion islands. Biol J Linnean Soc 73:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP (2007) Impacts of land use change on South-east Asian forest butterflies: a review. J Appl Ecol 44:703–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Sodhi NS, Brook BW (2004) Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 18:1571–1578

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Pulhin JM (2000) Forest land use change in the Philippines and climate change mitigation. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 5:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Pulhin JM (2006) Environmental impacts of community-based forest management in the Philippines. Int J Env Sust Dev 5:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Visco RG, Pulhin JM (2001) Secondary forests in the Philippines: formation and transformation in the 20th century. J Trop For Sci 13:652–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT, Wilson RJ, Harper MC (1998) Endemic butterflies on Grande Comore: habitat preferences and conservation priorities. Biol Conserv 85:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SL, Edwards DP, Galbraith D (2015) Increasing human dominance of tropical forests. Science 349:827–832

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lien VV, Yuan D (2003) The differences of butterfly (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) communities in habitats with various degrees of disturbance and altitudes in tropical forests of Vietnam. Biodiversity Conserv 12:1099–1111

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu DS, Iverson LR, Brown S (1993) Rates and patterns of deforestation in the Philippines: application of geographic information system analysis. For Ecol Manag 57:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Van Dyck H (2005) Habitat quality and biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened butterfly versus a multispecies group for wet heathlands in Belgium. Biol Conserv 123(2):177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE, Blackburn GA (2013) Conservation value of secondary forest habitats for endemic birds, a perspective from two widely separated tropical ecosystems. Ecography 137:250–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JEM (2016) Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets, and bulldozers. Nature 536:143–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millsap BA, Gore JA, Runde DE, Cerulean SI (1990) Setting priorities for conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildl Monogr 11:3–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Thomsen JB, da Fonseca GAB, Olivieri S (1998) Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness area: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv Biol 12:516–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukul SA, Herbohn J, Firn J (2016) Co-benefits of biodiversity and carbon sequestration from regenerating secondary forests in the Philippine uplands: implications for forest landscape restoration. Biotropica 48:882–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okano M, Okano T, Pizarras P (1989) Butterflies taken on Bohol Island, the Philippines (II). Artes Liberales 44:131–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B (2007) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.8-5. https://cran.r-project.org/

  • Peh KSH, de Jong J, Sodhi NS, Lim SLH, Yap CAM (2005) Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: Persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rural habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia. Biol Conserv 123:489–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Posa MRC, Sodhi NS (2006) Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biol Conserv 129:256–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Posa MRC, Diesmos AC, Sodhi NS, Brooks TM (2008) Hope for threatened tropical biodiversity: lessons from the Philippines. Bioscience 58:231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM (2000) Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 267:1947–1952

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2nd edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder HG, Treadaway CG (2005) Butterflies of the World, Part 20: Nymphalidae IX. Hillside Books, Canterbury, Amathusiini of the Philippine Islands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Brook BW, Ng PKL (2004) Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol Evol 19:654–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Koh LP, Prawiradilaga DM, Darjono TI, Putra DD, Tan THT (2005) Land use and conservation value for forest birds in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia). Biol Conserv 122:547–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Posa MRC, Lee TM, Bickford D, Koh LP, Brook BW (2010) The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:317–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K, Jaros J, Havelka J, Leps J (1997) Effect of small-scale disturbance on butterfly communities of an Indochinese montane rainforest. Biol Conserv 80:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez RK, Sajise PE (2010) Deforestation, swidden agriculture and Philippine biodiversity. Philipp Sci Lett 3:91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (1991) Habitat use and geographic ranges of butterflies from the wet lowlands of Costa Rica. Biol Conserv 55:269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadaway CG (2012) Revised checklist of the butterflies of the Philippine Islands (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). Nachricten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo Supplement 14:7–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukada E (1982) Butterflies of South East Asian Islands, vol III. Satyridae Libytheidae, Plapac Company, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara-Prado M, Brown KS, Freitas AVL (2007) Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallejo B (2011) The Philippines in Wallacea. In: Telnov D (ed) Biodiversity, biogeography and nature conservation in Wallacea and New Guinea, vol 1. The Entomological Society of Latvia, Riga, pp 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane-Wright RI (1990) The Philippines: key to the biogeography of Wallacea? In: Knight WJ, Holloway JD (eds) Insects and the rain forests of Southeast Asia (Wallacea). Royal Entomological Society of London, London, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Veddeler D, Schulze CH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Buchori D, Tscharntke T (2005) The contribution of tropical secondary forest fragments to the conservation of fruit-feeding butterflies: effects of isolation and age. Biodiversity Conserv 14:3577–3592

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijesinghe MR, de L. Brooke M (2005) Impact of habitat disturbance on the distribution of endemic species of small mammals and birds in a tropical rain forest in Sri Lanka. J Trop Ecol 21:661–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Willott SJ, Lim DC, Compton SG, Sutton SL (2000) Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a Bornean rainforest. Conserv Biol 14:1055–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. The National Academic Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Henrietta G. Cavile, Khorie Cavile, Dayting Mingoy, Nikka Hahn, Balmerie Villar, Chris Johns, Bibing Romo, Boy Enguito, Ryan Ca-Agoy, Martin Monilla, and the Cavile Family for logistical support and assistance in the field, the Philippine Department of Environment and Natural Resources for granting permits and providing information on site history, Tom Emmel and Keith Willmott for their advice on this project, and the University of Florida Tropical Conservation and Development Program for funding fieldwork. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 00107251 to LER.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lawrence E. Reeves

    Present address: Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 200 9th St. SE, Vero Beach, FL, 32962, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Entomology and Nematology Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Lawrence E. Reeves & Jaret C. Daniels

  2. McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 3215 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Jaret C. Daniels

Authors
  1. Lawrence E. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaret C. Daniels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence E. Reeves.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reeves, L.E., Daniels, J.C. Conservation value of secondary forest habitats to endemic frugivorous butterflies at Mount Kanlaon, Negros Occidental, Philippines. J Insect Conserv 24, 913–926 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00263-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00263-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation