Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat suitability of an at-risk, monolectic, ground-nesting bee Hesperapis oraria and its floral host Balduina angustifolia at two spatial scales along the Northern Gulf of Mexico

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hesperapis oraria, Snelling and Stage (Hymenoptera: Melittidae) is endemic to northern coastal habitats of the Gulf of Mexico and is a pollen specialist of floral host Balduina angustifolia Pursh. (Asteraceae). Specialization and restricted geographic distribution along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico warrants further investigation into habitat requirements of the bee. This study quantifies the habitat use of H. oraria in association with B. angustifolia distribution at regional and landscape spatial scales using a classification tree species distribution modeling approach. Hesperapis oraria density was lower on barrier island sites compared with coastal mainland sites; no H. oraria were found on non-coastal mainland sites. The regional distribution of H. oraria was driven by the number of B. angustifolia patches, while at the landscape scale H. oraria presence was predicted most strongly by B. angustifolia patch area, plant density, as well as distance from ephemeral wetlands. The regional distribution of B. angustifolia was influenced by the proximity to the bay and within a landscape B. angustifolia distribution was strongly influenced by the stability of the landscape feature in which it was found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizen MA, Harder LD (2007) Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakkenes M, Alkemade JRM, Ihle F, Leemans R, Latour JB (2002) Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Glob Change Biol 8:390–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber JL, Aspinall WP (2013) An expert judgement assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nature Climate Change 3(4):424–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch LC, Miller DM, Wilkinson EB (2011) Habitat restoration for beach mice: landscape-level population studies and dune restoration. Final Report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Panama City

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH (1994) Range, taxonomy and ecology of a newly discovered Gulf Coast solitary bee, Hesperapis oraria, belonging to a Southwestern desert genus. Department of Entomology, Auburn University, Auburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH (1997) Violent weather and bees: populations of the barrier island endemic, Hesperapis oraria (Hymenoptera:Melittidae) survive a Category 3 hurricane. J Kansas Entomol Soc 70(1):73–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH (2001) Habitat fragmentation and native bees a premature verdict? Conserv Ecol 5(1):3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00265-050103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Snelling RR, Kervin LJ (1996) A new monolectic coastal bee, Hesperapis oraria Snelling and Stage (Hymenoptera: Melittidae), with a review of desert and neotropical disjunctives in the Southeastern US. J Kansas Entomol Soc 69(4):238–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Sampson BJ, Miller SA (2011) Pollination value of male bees: the specialist bee Peponapis pruinosa (Apidae) at summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Environ Entomol 40:614–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ, Roulston TH, Williams NM (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 16:632–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filella I, Bosch J, Llusia J, Penuelas A, Penuelas J (2011) Chemical cues involved in the attraction of the oligolectic bee Hoplitis adunca to its host plant Echium vulgare. Biochem Syst Ecol 39:498–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) (2010) Guide to the natural communities of Florida, 2010th edn. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen M, Larsson M (2007) Pollen harvesting and reproductive rates in specialized solitary bees. Ann Zool Fenn 44:405–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathmann A, Tscharntke T (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. J Anim Ecol 71:757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsberger HK (2013) Distribution and habitat use of Florida endemic solitary bee Hesperapis oraria and host plant Balduina angustifolia. Masters Thesis, University of Florida

  • Kopec K, Burd LA (2017) Pollinators in peril: a systematic status review of North American and Hawaiian native bees. Center of Biological Diversity, Arizona, p 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Looney PB, Gibson DJ, Blyth A, Cousens MI (1993) Flora of the Gulf Islands National Seashore, Perdido Key, Florida. Bull Torrey Bot Club 120(3):327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas KL, Carter GA (2010) Decadal changes in habitat-type coverage on Horn Island, Mississippi, USA. J Coast Res 26:1142–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons BA, Mortensen AN, Ellis JD (2015) Coastal plain Hesperapis, Hesperapis oraria Snelling and Stage (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Melittidae). EDIS Publication Number EENY-615 (January 2015). Retrieved from https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/misc/bees/Hesperapis_oraria.htm

  • Lumban Tobing ST, Thetford M, Miller DM (2018) Germination and predation of Quercus geminata and Quercus myrtifolia Acorns on Santa Rosa Island, Florida. J Coast Res 34(4):900–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA (www.pcord.com) 304 pages. With a contribution by Dean L Urban. ISBN 0-9721290-0-6.

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2005) PC-ORD, multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5 for windows. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2011) PC-ORD multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 6. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls R (2011) Planning for the Impacts of Sea Level Rise. Oceanography 24(2):144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Marinova N, Lowe JA, Brown S, Vellinga P, de Gusmão D, Hinkel J, Tol RSJ (2011) Sea-level rise and its possible impacts given a ‘beyond 4°C world’ in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans Royal Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1934):161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA Historic hurricane track data for 1990–2012. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/news/historical-hurricanes/

  • Parker ES, Jones SB (1975) Systematic study of genus Balduina (Compositae, Heliantheae). Brittonia 27:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AT, Ortega-Huerta MA, Bartley J, Sanchez-Cordero V, Soberon J, Buddemeier RH, Stockwell DRB (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416:626–629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, O’Toole C, Roberts S, Willmer P (2003a) Response of plant-pollinator communities to fire: changes in diversity, abundance and floral reward structure. Oikos 101:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer P (2003b) Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84:2628–2642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S (2004) Nectar resource diversity organizes flower-visitor community structure. Entomol Exp Appl 113:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pries AJ, Miller DL, Branch LC (2008) Identification of structural and spatial features that influence storm-related dune erosion along a barrier-island ecosystem in the Gulf of Mexico. J Coast Res 24:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pries AJ, Branch LC, Miller DL (2009) Impact of hurricanes on habitat occupancy and spatial distribution of beach mice. J Mammal 90:841–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell KN, Ikerd H, Doege S (2005) The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees. Biol Conserv 124:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple JC (1978) A new species endemic to West Florida: Chrysopsis godfreyi (Compositae-Astereae). Can J Bot 56:2092–2096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semple JC, Blok VC, Heiman P (1980) Morphological, anatomical, habit, and habitat differences among the goldenaster genera Chrysopsis, Heterotheca and Pityopsis (Compositae-Astereae). Can J Bot 58:147–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106:467–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Small JK (1933) Manual of the southeastern flora. New York

  • SPM Salford Predictive Modeler ® Software Suite © 1984–2013 Salford Systems, CART© 1984–2013 California Statistical Software, Inc

  • Swink F, Wilhelm G (1994) Plants of the Chicago region, 4th edn. Indiana Academy of Sciences, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Ferreira de Siquiera M, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, Van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urban DL, Oneill RV, Shugart HH (1987) Landscape ecology. Bioscience 37:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vayssières MP, Plant RE, Allen-Diaz BH (2000) Classification trees: an alternative non-parametric approach for predicting species distribution. J Veg Sci 11:679–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson EB, Branch LC, Miller DL (2013) Functional habitat connectivity for beach mice depends on perceived predation risk. Landsc Ecol 28:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM, Kremen C (2007) Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol Appl 17:910–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zurbuchen A, Landert L, Klaiber J, Muller A, Hein S, Dorn S (2010) Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have capability to cover long foraging distances. Biol Conserv 143:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MS degree by Hannah Hunsberger and is based upon work supported by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McIntire Stennis project under FLA‐JAY‐005222. The authors acknowledge financial support by the U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service (Study #:GUIS-00172). Research permits for conducting the study in protected areas were proved by U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida State Forests and Florida Park Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie L. Miller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, H.K., Miller, D.L. & Thetford, M. Habitat suitability of an at-risk, monolectic, ground-nesting bee Hesperapis oraria and its floral host Balduina angustifolia at two spatial scales along the Northern Gulf of Mexico. J Insect Conserv 24, 561–573 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00236-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00236-0

Keywords

Navigation