Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nestedness-patterns of Odonata assemblages in artificial and natural aquatic habitats reveal the potential role of drinking troughs for aquatic insect conservation

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nestedness patterns including both artificial and natural habitat may represent evidence of such habitats’ importance in community assembly and conservation of animals inhabiting those sites. Odonata often colonize drinking troughs (artificial water reservoirs) and thus they are good study models as umbrella species. We investigated if a network of artificial (troughs) and natural (pools) aquatic habitats could create a nested subset pattern for Odonata assemblages. We surveyed all the troughs present in the Castelporziano Estate (Italy, Lazio). Odonata larvae have been collected and identified. Data of a previous paper on 18 natural pools and ponds, and our samplings of 16 troughs were organized into a presence-absence matrix. The Odonata assemblage within natural and artificial habitats is significantly nested with both NODF and T metrics. Odonata species found in the troughs represented 40% of the total species pool. Some troughs interspersed with the natural pools in the nested order: eight troughs were richer in species than some natural pools, despite the big difference in surface area. Pristine water bodies and their area may not represent major constraints for species to oviposit and for larvae to grow. Drinking troughs can be highly relevant for representing refuges in the absence or decline of natural ponds and pools: lacking in top-predators (fishes), they are small “island” habitats that support the generations of Odonata (or other aquatic macroinvertebrates) during dry periods of natural water bodies. The use and focused management of such habitats can be an effective practice for freshwater ecosystems management and Odonata conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida-Neto M, Guimaraes P, Guimaraes PR Jr, Loyola RD, Ulrich W (2008) A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos 117:1227–1239

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew RR (1988) The dragonflies of Europe. Harley books, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W, Patterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bried JT, Samways MJ (2015) A review of odonatology in freshwater applied ecology and conservation science. Freshw Sci 34(3):1023–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Briers RA, Biggs J (2003) Indicator taxa for the conservation of pond invertebrate diversity. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13:323–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM, Malvárez AI (2002) Temperate freshwater wetlands: types status and threats. Environ Conserv 29:115–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Buono V, Bissattini AM, Vignoli L (2019) Can a cow save a newt? The role of cattle drinking troughs in amphibian conservation. Aquat Conserv 29(6):964–975

  • Carchini G (2016) A key to the larvae of Italian species of Dragonflies (Odonata). Universitalia, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayrou J, Céréghino R (2005) Life-cycle phenology of some aquatic insects: implications for pond conservation. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 15:559–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerini F, Bologna MA, Vignoli L (2019) Dragonflies community assembly in artificial habitats: Glimpses from field and manipulative experiments. PLoS ONE 14(6):e0214127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet PS (2004) Dragonflies: behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley books, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig CN, Reece BA, McIntyre NE (2008) Nestedness in playa odonates as a function of area and surrounding land-use. Wetlands 28(4):995

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler AH (1994) Nested biotas and biological conservation: metrics mechanisms and meaning of nestedness. Landsc Urban Plann 28:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Domeneghetti D, Mondini S, Carchini G (2015) Odonata species richness in the Castelporziano presidential estate present and past. Rend Lincei 26:367–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) Nestedness in fragmented landscapes: a case study on birds arboreal marsupials and lizards. J Biogeogr 32:1737–1750

    Google Scholar 

  • Franciscolo ME (1979) Coleoptera: Haliplidae, Hygrobiidae, Gyrinidae. Dytiscidae, Edizioni Calderini Bologna, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalez C, Garcia-Vazquez E (2011) The value of traditional troughs as freshwater shelters for amphibian diversity. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 21:74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2005) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 14:395–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee JH, Smith BD, Lee KM, Griffiths SW (1997) The ecological basis of freshwater pond management for biodiversity. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 7:91–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandi M (1960) Accademia nazionale italiana di entomologia, Unione zoologica italiana. Fauna d'Italia: Ephemerodea/a cura di Marta Grandi, Calderini

  • Harabiš F, Dolný A (2015) Necessity for the conservation of drainage systems as last refugia for threatened damselfly species, Coenagrion ornatum. Insect Conserv Divers 8(2):143–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrivnák R, Kochjarová J, Oťaheľová H, Paľove-Balang P, Slezák M, Slezák P (2014) Environmental drivers of macrophyte species richness in artificial and natural aquatic water bodies–comparative approach from two central European regions. Ann Limnol 50:269–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadoya T, Suda SI, Nishihiro J, Washitani I (2008) Procedure for predicting the trajectory of species recovery based on the nested species pool information: dragonflies in a wetland restoration site as a case study. Restor Ecol 16(3):397–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi Frattarelli F, Folletto A, Recanatesi F, Maffei L (2012) Realizzazione della ‘‘Carta delle Piscine’’ In: Tinelli A, Folletto A, Manfredi Fratelli F, Maffei L, Musicanti A, Recanatesi F (eds) Il sistema ambientale della Tenuta di Castelporziano ‘‘Le zone umide’’. Accad Naz Scienze XL, Roma, pp 144–158

  • Matthews TJ, Cottee-Jones HEW, Whittaker RJ (2015) Quantifying and interpreting nestedness in habitat islands: a synthetic analysis of multiple datasets Divers Distrib 21:392–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami M, Hirao T (2010) Nestedness of insect assemblages on small Bahamian islands: importance of spatial processes. Insect Conserv Divers 3:229–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD, Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biol J Linn Soc 28:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires MM, Stenert C, Maltchik L (2017) Partitioning beta-diversity through different pond hydroperiod lengths reveals predominance of nestedness in assemblages of immature odonates. Entomol Sci 20(1):318–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Santamaría L (2006) A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence–absence matrices. J Biogeogr 33:924–935

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero A, Céréghino R, Figuerola J, Marty P, Angélibert S (2008) Farm ponds make a contribution to the biodiversity of aquatic insects in a French agricultural landscape. CR Biol 331:298–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlén G, Ekestubbe K (2001) Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodivers Conserv 10(5):673–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai M, Suda SI, Okeda T, Washitani I (2017) Identifying priority habitats and monitoring species for conservation and restoration of lentic Odonata habitats: assemblage nestedness on Amami-Oshima Island. Jpn Ecol Res 32(5):693–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel M, Cox SB, Mittelbach GG, Osenberg C, Kaspari M (2000) Species richness species–area curves and Simpson’s paradox. Evol Ecol Res 2(6):791–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten MA, Verweij PA, Barendregt A, Kleukers RJM, De Ruiter PC (2007) Nested assemblages of Orthoptera species in the Netherlands: the importance of habitat features and life-history traits. J Biogeogr 34:1938–1946

    Google Scholar 

  • Siesa ME (2017) Le libellule delle Alpi come riconoscerle dove e quando osservarle. Blu Edizioni, Marene, Cuneo

    Google Scholar 

  • Šigutová H, Šigut M, Dolný A (2015) Intensive fish ponds as ecological traps for dragonflies: an imminent threat to the endangered species Sympetrum depressiusculum (Odonata: Libellulidae). J Insect Conserv 19(5):961–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I (2003) Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv Biol 17:1036–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Strona G, Fattorini S (2014) On the methods to assess significance in nestedness analyses. Theory Biosci 133:179–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strona G, Galli P, Seveso D, Montano S, Fattorini S (2014) Nestedness for Dummies (NeD): a user-friendly web interface for exploratory nestedness analysis. J Stat Softw 59:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhling F, Martens A, Suhling I (2017) Long-distance dispersal in Odonata: Examples from arid Namibia. Austral Ecol 42:544–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W, Gotelli NJ (2012) A null model algorithm for presence–absence matrices based on proportional resampling. Ecol Model 244:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO, MacArthur RH (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright DH, Patterson BD, Mikkelson GM, Cutler A, Atmar W (1997) A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113(1):1–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yee DA (ed) (2014) Ecology, systematics, and the natural history of predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Springer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiming LI, Niemelä J, Dianmo LI (1998) Nested distribution of amphibians in the Zhoushan archipelago China: can selective extinction cause nested subsets of species? Oecologia 113:557–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the Presidency of the Italian Republic for granting us permission to access and sampling in the Castelporziano Estate, and to the Estate personnel for the facilities and help in sites location. We would like to thank Gianmaria Carchini for his help in taxonomic training of FC. Finally, we would like to thank Giampiè from Diga de Firenzuola community for teaching us the right way to catch a sturgeon.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze, Università Roma Tre, Viale Marconi 446, 00146, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Cerini, Marco A. Bologna & Leonardo Vignoli

Authors
  1. Francesco Cerini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco A. Bologna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leonardo Vignoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The work is all original and the research was carried out by the authors; all authors agree with the contents of the manuscript and its submission to the journal; no part of the research has been published in any form elsewhere; the manuscript is not being considered for publication elsewhere; any research in the paper not carried out by the authors is fully acknowledged in the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Cerini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The work is compliant with the Ethical standards of Journal of Insect Conservation. The research does not involve protected animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerini, F., Bologna, M.A. & Vignoli, L. Nestedness-patterns of Odonata assemblages in artificial and natural aquatic habitats reveal the potential role of drinking troughs for aquatic insect conservation. J Insect Conserv 24, 421–429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00234-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00234-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation