Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 555–564 | Cite as

How does habitat diversity affect ground-dwelling arthropods assemblages in Douro Demarcated Region terraced vineyards?

  • Cristina CarlosEmail author
  • Fátima Gonçalves
  • Luís Crespo
  • Vera Zina
  • Irene Oliveira
  • António Crespí
  • Laura Torres
Original Paper

Abstract

We investigated the impact of neighborhood non-crop habitats (NCHs) and cover vegetation in the Douro Demarcated Region terraced vineyards on ground-dwelling arthropods communities. Arthropods were sampled using pitfall traps located either in NCH as inside vineyards, at three distances (5, 25 and 50 m from NCH). Vegetation cover and plant species richness were evaluated around each trap. Omnivores (Formicidae) and detritivores (mainly Collembola), accounted for 42.0% and 33.7% of the sample, respectively. Predators, mainly dominated by Scydmaenidae (Coleoptera) and Araneae, accounted for 19.4% of the sample. The abundance of omnivores and predators was higher in NCH than in vineyards. In Formicidae, the generalist/opportunist group dominated, being highly represented by Pheidole pallidula. This group occurred mainly in NCH and its abundance was positively correlated either with plant richness as with percentage of fresh and total cover vegetation. This study indicates that preserving NCH close to the vineyards, as well as promoting native vegetation, enhances the presence of ground-dwelling arthropods.

Keywords

Non-crop habitats Vegetation cover Functional groups Biodiversity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is part of C. Carlos’s Ph.D. Dissertation. This study was funded by the Association for the Development of Viticulture in the Douro Region (ADVID). We thank the technicians Maria do Carmo Val and Susana Sousa for supporting work activities. We also thank to Real Companhia Velha, Sogevinus and Sogrape wine companies, for providing their vineyards to conduct the field work, and their viticulture managers for technical support. Coleoptera specimens were identified by taxonomists of the Natural History Museum of London. The identification of Coleoptera was supported by ECOVITIS Project (Programa de Desenvolvimento Rural/PRODER. Med. 4.1 “Cooperacão para a Inovacão” (PA 24043)). Authors integrated in CITAB Research Centre were supported by National Funds by FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under the Project UID/AGR/04033/2019. The author integrated in CEMAT-IST-UL was supported by FCT, under the Project UID/MULTI/04621/2019. The author integrated in the Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior de Agronomia was supported by the Project “Technical cooperation, knowledge sharing and training in the area of forest and agricultural entomology and integrated pest management”, funded by KKL-JNF Israel.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Supplementary material

10841_2019_144_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 KB)
10841_2019_144_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 15 KB)
10841_2019_144_MOESM3_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 17 KB)
10841_2019_144_MOESM4_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 16 KB)
10841_2019_144_MOESM5_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 22 KB)
10841_2019_144_MOESM6_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 16 KB)
10841_2019_144_MOESM7_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (DOCX 15 KB)

References

  1. Addison P, Baauw AH, Groenewald GA (2013) An initial investigation of the effects of mulch layers on soil-dwelling arthropod assemblages in vineyards. S Afr J Enol Vitic 34(2):266–271Google Scholar
  2. Andresen T, Bianchi de Aguiar F, Curado MJ (2004) The Alto Douro Wine Region greenway. Landsc Urban Plan 68:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1:1-17Google Scholar
  4. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (1996) The effects of land use on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in the Argentine Chaco. Ecol Appl 6(4):1225–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolduc E, Buddle CM, Bostanian NJ, Vincent C (2005) Ground-dwelling spider fauna (Araneae) of two vineyards in southern Quebec. Environ Entomol 34(3):635–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruggisser OT, Schmidt-Entling MH, Bacher S (2010) Effects of vineyard management on biodiversity at three trophic levels. Biol Conserv 143(6):1521–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buschke FT, Seaman MT (2011) Functional feeding groups as a taxonomic surrogate for a grassland arthropod assemblage. Afr Invertebr 52(1):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caprio E, Nervo B, Isaia M, Allegro G, Rolando A (2015) Organic versus conventional systems in viticulture: comparative effects on spiders and carabids in vineyards and adjacent forests. Agric Syst 136:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cárdenas M, Pascual F, Campos M, Pekár S (2015) The spider assemblage of olive groves under three management systems. Environ Entomol 44(3):509–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardoso P, Pekár S, Jocqué R, Coddington JA (2011) Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. PLoS ONE 6(6):e21710.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021710 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Crespí AL, Bernardos S, Castro A, Fernandes CP, Amich F (2005) Phytostructural characterization of several vegetation types in northern Portugal. II. The structural expressivity and the resistance of the vegetation. Plant Biosyst 139(3):387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaigher R, Samways MJ (2010) Surface-active arthropods in organic vineyards, integrated vineyards and natural habitat in the Cape Floristic Region. J Insect Conserv 14:595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garbach K, Milder JC, Montenegro M, Karp DS, DeClerck FAJ (2014) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems. In: Encyclopedia agricultural food systems, vol 2, pp 21–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00013-9
  15. Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, Morales MB, Ceryngier P, Liira J, Tscharntke T, Winqvist C, Eggers S, Bommarco R, Pärt T, Bretagnolle V, Plantegenest M, Clement LW, Dennis C, Palmer C, Oñate JJ, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Aavik T, Thies C, Flohre A, Hänke S, Fischer C, Goedhart PW, Inchausti P (2010) Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol 11:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holec M, Frouz J, Pokorný R (2006) The influence of different vegetation patches on the spatial distribution of nest and the epigeic activity of ants (Lasius niger) on a spoil bank after brown coal mining (Czech Republic). Eur J Soil Biol 42:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Isaia M, Bona F, Badino G (2006) Influence of landscape diversity and agricultural practices on spider assemblage in Italian vineyards of Langa Astigiana (NW-Italy). Environ Entomol 35:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, Díaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovács A, Marshall EJP, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land use intensity in Europe. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:903–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knapp M, Řezáč M (2015) Even the smallest non-crop habitat islands could be beneficial: distribution of carabid beetles and spiders in agricultural landscape. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0123052.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123052 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Košulič O, Michalko R, Hula V (2014) Recent artificial vineyard terraces as a refuge for rare and endangered spiders in a modern agricultural landscape. Ecol Eng 68:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawrence KL, Wise DH (2000) Spider predation on forest-floor collembolan and evidence for indirect effects on decomposition. Pedobiologia 44:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehman RM, Acosta-Martinez V, Buyer JS, Cambardella SA, Collins HP, Ducey TF, Halvorson JJ, Jin VL, Johnson JMF, Kremer RJ, Lundgren JG, Manter DK, Maul JE, Smith JL, Stott DE (2015) Soil biology for resilient, healthy soil. J Soil Water Conserv 70(1):12A–18ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. May RM (1988) How many species are there on Earth? Science 241:1441–1449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Melbourne BA (1999) Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: an experimental evaluation. Aust J Ecol 24:228–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moreno CE, Guevara R, Sánchez-Rojas G, Télleza D. Verdú JR (2008) Community level patterns in diverse systems: a case study of litter fauna in a Mexican pine-oak forest using higher taxa surrogates and re-sampling methods. Acta Oecol 33:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nascimbene J, Marini L, Ivan D, Zottini M (2013) Management intensity and topography determined plant diversity in vineyards. PLoS ONE 8(10):e76167.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076167 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nash MA, Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA (2008) Effect of remnant vegetation, pesticides, and farm management on abundance of the beneficial predator Notonomus gravis (Chaudoir) (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Biol Control 46:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oksanen J, Blanchett FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHM, Wagner H (2016) Vegan: community. Ecology package. R Package 2.4-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 9 Sep 2016
  29. Pérez-Bote JL, Romero A (2012) Epigeic soil arthropod abundance under different agricultural land uses. Span J Agric Res 10(1):55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2002) Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett 5:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polis GA, McCormick SJ (1987) Intraguild predation and competition among desert scorpions. Ecology 68:332–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 1 Aug 2016
  33. Roig X, Espadaler X (2010) Proposal of functional groups of ants for the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands and their use as bioindicators. Iberomyrmex 2:28–29Google Scholar
  34. Sackett TE, Buddle CM, Vincent C (2009) Dynamics of spider colonization of apple orchards from adjacent deciduous forest. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sandler RV, Falco LB, Di Ciocco CA, Castro-Huerta R, Coviella CE (2014) The degree of change of collembolan community structure related to anthropic soil disturbance. PeerJ 2:e721v1.  https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.721v1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharley DJ, Hoffmann AA, Thomson LJ (2008) The effects of soil tillage on beneficial invertebrates within the vineyard. Agric For Entomol 10:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA (2007) Effects of ground cover (straw and compost) on the abundance of natural enemies and soil macro invertebrates in vineyards. Agric For Entomol 9:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA (2009) Vegetation increases the abundance of natural enemies in vineyards. Biol Control 49:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Topping CJ, Sunderland KD (1992) Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. J Appl Ecol 29:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Triplehorn CA, Johnson NF (2005) Borror and DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects, 7th edn. Thomson Brooks/Cole, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  41. Trivellone V, Paltrinieri LP, Jermini M, Moretti M (2012) Management pressure drives leafhopper communities in vineyards in southern Switzerland. Insect Conserv Divers 5:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. ‎Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang B, Chang L, Ni Z, Callaham MA, Sun X, Wu D (2014) Effects of land use changes on winter-active Collembola in Sanjiang Plain of China. Appl Soil Ecol 83: 51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Association for the Development of Viticulture in the Douro Region, ADVIDVila RealPortugal
  2. 2.Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological SciencesCITAB, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, UTADVila RealPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences (Arthropods), Biodiversity Research Institute (IRBio)Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior de AgronomiaUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Center for Computational and Stochastic Mathematics, CEMAT-IST-ULUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations