Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial structure of traditional land organization allows long-term persistence of large Formica exsecta supercolony in actively managed agricultural landscape

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Semi-natural linear habitats such as field and meadow margins are often crucial in maintaining insect diversity and species distributions in agricultural landscapes. While many ant species are capable of forming large colonies (supercolonies) that can have considerable effects on the ecosystem within which they are embedded, it is not known how colony development, persistence, and spatial structure in agricultural areas may be affected by these boundary habitats. We used historical orthophotographs, extensive mapping of ant nests, and spatial statistics to study how the structure of fine-scale traditional agricultural land-use mosaic in the western Carpathians of Central Europe (Slovakia) influenced one of the largest supercolonies of Formica exsecta documented in Europe—the second largest supercolony in terms of the number of nests (~1500 nests) and significant in its spatial extent (~5 ha) and estimated population abundance (~50 million of workers). The spatial analysis indicated that a distinct linear arrangement of the majority of nests along unmanaged property boundaries contributed to the remarkable size of the colony. Further, the structure of the supercolony appeared to be variable in space and dynamic over time; while some areas appeared to be saturated by larger older nests (hot spots), other areas were characterized by clusters of smaller younger nests (cold spots) potentially suggesting colony expansion over time. Field and grassland boundaries are important components of traditional fine-scale land organization in Central Europe and elsewhere, and they appeared to provide suitable and stable nesting habitat that facilitated the growth of the second largest European supercolony of F. exsecta, while the areas further away from the boundaries were affected negatively by land management. Our results demonstrate that F. exsecta supercolonies may persist in a broader range of agricultural disturbance regimes, including intensive grassland management (e.g., mowing), when an appropriate network of habitat refugia is included into land organization (e.g., unmanaged margins).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baran-Zgłobicka B, Zgłobicki W (2012) Mosaic landscapes of SE Poland: should we preserve them? Agrofor Syst 85:351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan A, Conolly J, Colledge S, Frederick C, Palmer C, Siddall R, Stellatou A (2013) The long-term ecology of agricultural terraces and enclosed fields from Antikythera, Greece. Hum Ecol 41:255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezděčka P, Bezděčková K (2008) The present state of populations of Coptoformica ants in the Czech Republic. Acta Rerum Nat 5:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss P, Katzerke A, Neumann P (2006) The role of molehills and grasses for filial nest founding in the wood ant Formica exsecta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 47:903–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Bunce RGH, Burel F (2000) Hedgerows: An international perspective on their origin, function and management. J Environ Manag 60:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ (2009) The ecological setting of social evolution: the demography of ant populations. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer S, Ugelvig LV, Drijfhout FP, Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Seifert B, Hughes DP, Schulz A, Petersen KS, Konrad H, Stauffer C, Kiran K, Espadaler X, d’Ettorre P, Aktac N, Eilenberg J, Jones GR, Nash DR, Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ (2008) The evolution of invasiveness in garden ants. PloS ONE 3, e3838

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH, Martinsen GD, Mazeroll AI (1988) Density- and size-dependent spacing of ant nests: evidence for intraspecific competition. Oecologia 77:522–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dauber J, Wolters V (2004) Edge effects on ant community structure and species richness in an agricultural landscape. Biodiv Conserv 13:901–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckers B, Kerselaers E, Gulinck H, Muys B, Hermy M (2005) Long-term spatio-temporal dynamics of a hedgerow network landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Environ Conserv 32:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Pelini SL (2012) The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 17:133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewes E (1993) Die Kerbameise (Formica exsecta Nyl.) im Naturpark Saar-Hunsrück (saarländischer Teil). Ameisenschutz Aktuell 3:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovčiak M, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2005) Pathways in old-field succession to white pine: seed rain, shade, and climate effects. Ecol Monogr 75:363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovčiak M, Hrivnák R, Ujházy K, Gömöry D (2015) Patterns of grassland invasions by trees: insights from demographic and genetic spatial analyses. J Plant Ecol 8: 468–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover J, Sparks T, Clarke S, Gobbett K, Glossop S (2000) Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80: 227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield SJ, Aebischer NJ (1994) The effect of spatial scale of treatment with dimethoate on invertebrate population recovery in winter wheat. J Appl Ecol 31:263–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Hartel T, Kuemmerle T (2012) Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conserv Lett 5:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M-J, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: A guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis A, Ord JK (1992) The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal 24:189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud T, Pedersen JS, Keller L (2002) Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6075–6079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goropashnaya AV, Fedorov VB, Seifert B, Pamilo P (2007) Phylogeography and population structure in the ant Formica exsecta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) across Eurasia as reflected by mitochondrial DNA variation and microsatellites. Ann Zool Fennici 44:462–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Goryunov DN (2015) Nest-building in Ants Formica exsecta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Entomol Rev 95:953–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green R, Osborne P, Sears E (1994) The distribution of passerine birds in hedgerows during the breeding-season in relation to characteristics of the hedgerow and adjacent farmland. J Appl Ecol 31:677–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths GJK, Winder L, Holland MJ, Thomas CFG, Williams E (2007) The representation and functional composition of carabid and staphylinid beetles in different field boundary types at a farm-scale. Biol Conserv 135:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habel JC, Dengler J, Janišová M, Török P, Wellstein C, Wiezik M (2013) European grassland ecosystems: threatened hotspots of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 22:2131–2138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett M, Lawrence A (2014) Multifunctional role of field margins in arable farming. Report for European Crop Protection Association by Cambridge Environmental Assessments—ADAS UK Ltd, Cambridge

  • Helanterä H, Strassmann JE, Carrillo J, Queller DC (2009) Unicolonial ants: where do they come from, what are they and where are they going? Trends Ecol Evol 24:341–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J, Broome A (2007) Forests and wood ants in Scotland. Forestry Commission, Crown, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnová Z, Knapp M, Boháč J, Tulachová M (2016) The role of various meadow margin types in shaping carabid and staphylinid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in meadow dominated landscapes. J Insect Conserv 20:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kümmerli R, Keller L (2007) Contrasting population genetic structure for workers and queens in the putatively unicolonial ant Formica exsecta. Mol Ecol 16:4493–4503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieskovský J, Kenderessy P, Špulerová J, Lieskovský T, Koleda P, Kienast F, Gimmi U (2014) Factors affecting the persistence of traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia during the collectivization of agriculture. Landsc Ecol 29:867–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipský Z (2000) Historical development of Czech rural landscape: implications for present landscape planning. In: Richling A et al (ed) Landscape Ecology: theory and applications for practical purposes. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. VI. Warsaw, pp 149–159

  • Maggini R, Guisan A, Cherix D (2002) A stratified approach for modeling the distribution of a threatened ant species in the Swiss National Park. Biodivers Conserv 11:2117–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäki-Petäys H, Zakharov A, Viljakainen L, Corander J, Pamilo P (2005) Genetic changes associated to declining populations of Formica ants in fragmented forest landscape. Mol Ecol 14:733–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markó B, Czekes Z, Erős K, Csata E, Szász-Len A-M (2012) The largest polydomous system of Formica ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Europe discovered thus far in Romania. North-West J Zool 8:287–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJP, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merckx T, Marini L, Feber RE, Macdonald DW (2012) Hedgerow trees and extended-width field margins enhance macro-moth diversity: implications for management. J Appl Ecol 49:1396–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklós L, Hrnčiarová T (eds) (2002) Landscape atlas of the Slovak Republic. Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, Esprit, Bratislava and Banská Štiavnica

  • Mitchell A (2005) The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, vol 2. ESRI Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnárová K (2008) Long-term dynamics of the structural attributes of hedgerow networks in the Czech Republic: three case studies in areas with preserved medieval field patterns. J Landsc Stud 1:113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandin LA, Kremen C (2013) Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecol Appl 23:829–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MG (2000) The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands. Biol Conserv 95:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC (2013) Biodiversity conservation and the traditional management of common land: the case of the new forest. In: Rotherham ID (ed) Cultural severance and the environment the ending of traditional and customary practice on commons and landscapes managed in common. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 353–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Offenberg J (2015) Ants as tools in sustainable agriculture. J Appl Ecol 52:1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1991) Life span of queens in the ant Formica exsecta. Insectes Soc 38:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden MW, Menéndez R, Leather SR, Wäckers F (2015) Optimizing field margins for biocontrol services: the relative role of aphid abundance, annual floral resources, and overwinter habitat in enhancing aphid natural enemies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 199:94–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouabah A, Villerd J, Amiaud B, Plantureux S, Lasserre-Joulin F (2015) Response of carabid beetles diversity and size distribution to the vegetation structure within differently managed field margins. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz M, Kretz C, Dekoninck L, Iravani M, Risch AC (2008) Impact of Formica exsecta Nyl. on seed bank and vegetation patterns in a subalpine grassland ecosystem. J Appl Entomol 132:295–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert B (2000) A taxonomic revision of the ant subgenus Coptoformica Mueller, 1923 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zoosystema 22:517–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert B (2007) Die Ameisen Mittel-und Nordeuropas. Lutra Verlags-und Vertriebsgesselschaft, Görlitz/Tauer

  • Seifert B (2010) Intranidal mating, gyne polymorphism, polygyny, and supercoloniality as factors for sympatric and parapatric speciation in ants. Ecol Entomol 35 (Suppl 1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppä P, Johansson H, Gyllenstrand N, Pálsson S, Pamilo P (2012) Mosaic structure of native ant supercolonies. Mol Ecol 23:5880–5891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solymosi K (2011) Indicators for the identification of cultural landscape hotspots in Europe. Landsc Res 36:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Špulerová J, Dobrovodská M, Lieskovský J, Bača A, Halabuk A, Kohút F, Mojses M, Kenderessy P, Piscová V, Barančok P, Gerhátová K, Krajčí J, Boltižiar M (2011) Inventory and classification of historical structures of the agricultural landscape in Slovakia. Ekológia 30:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockan JA, Rao S, Pakeman R (2010) Nesting preferences of the threatened wood ant Formica exsecta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae); implications for conservation in Scotland. J Insect Conserv 14:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Weiblen G, Thomson BA, Alfaro S, Legendre P (1996) Untangling multiple factors in spatial distributions: lilies, gophers, and rocks. Ecology 77:1698–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigos Peral G, Markó B, Babik H, Tăuşan I, Maák I, Pálfi Z, Ślipiński P, Czekes Z, Czechowski W (2016) Differential impact of two dominant Formica ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) on subordinates in temperate. Eur J Hymenopt Res 50:97–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitikainen EIK, Haag-Liautard C, Sundström L (2015) Natal dispersal, mating patterns, and inbreeding in the ant Formica exsecta. Am Nat 186:716–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel V, Pedersen JS, Giraud T, Krieger MJB, Keller L (2010) The worldwide expansion of the Argentine ant. Divers Distrib 16:170–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiezik M, Wieziková A, Svitok M (2011) Vegetation structure, ecological stability, and low-disturbance regime of abandoned dry grasslands support specific ant assemblages in Central Slovakia. Tuexenia 31: 301–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiezik M, Svitok M, Wieziková A, Dovčiak M (2013) Shrub encroachment alters composition and diversity of ant communities in abandoned grasslands of western Carpathians. Biodivers Conserv 22:2305–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was founded by research grant No. 1/0186/14 of the Slovak Grant Agency for Science (VEGA). We would like to thank two anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Science, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 53, Zvolen, Slovakia

    Michal Wiezik, Igor Gallay & Marek Čiliak

  2. Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Science, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 53, Zvolen, Slovakia

    Adela Wieziková

  3. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 459 Illick Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Martin Dovciak

Authors
  1. Michal Wiezik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Gallay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adela Wieziková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marek Čiliak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martin Dovciak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Wiezik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wiezik, M., Gallay, I., Wieziková, A. et al. Spatial structure of traditional land organization allows long-term persistence of large Formica exsecta supercolony in actively managed agricultural landscape. J Insect Conserv 21, 257–266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9973-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9973-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation