Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 75–86 | Cite as

Distribution and habitat of endangered American burying beetle in northern and southern regions

  • Douglas R. LeasureEmail author
  • W. Wyatt Hoback
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus, is a federally endangered insect that once occurred in 35 US states and 3 Canadian provinces. Today, it remains at the periphery of its former range with the largest populations concentrated in Nebraska and Oklahoma. We assessed beetle occurrence records throughout the western ranges in Nebraska and Oklahoma, but excluded a small eastern population on Block Island, Rhode Island. We compiled more than 2500 presence–absence records and used GIS-based random forest models to create distribution maps throughout the current western range of the American burying beetle based on habitat characteristics within 800 m of each trap. We also used generalized linear models to identify habitat characteristics associated with N. americanus occurrences and to document differences between northern and southern habitat associations. In its northern range, N. americanus was associated with wetter areas while avoiding agricultural and urban areas. In the southern range, N. americanus was associated with sandy soils, hayfields, and native forests and grasslands, while avoiding human population centers and agricultural areas. Our N. americanus distribution maps for the northern and southern regions highlight areas where N. americanus is likely to occur, providing a tool that may improve current management. This first attempt at a range-wide model of American burying beetle occurrences revealed important differences among regions and can improve region-specific management and conservation.

Keywords

Nicrophorus Distribution model Random forest model Conservation Endangered insect management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the many researchers, land managers, and consultants that collected data used in this study. Several people were instrumental in our access to data: Erin Leone (USFWS), Anita Barstow (USFWS), Elizabeth Phillips (Fort Chaffee), Dan Farrer (Fort Chaffee), and Amy Smith (Camp Gruber).

References

  1. Anderson RS (1982) On the decreasing abundance of Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in eastern North America. Coleops Bull 36:362–365Google Scholar
  2. Bedick JC, Ratcliffe BC, Hoback WW, Higley LG (1999) Distribution, ecology, and population dynamics of the American burying beetle [Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera, Silphidae)] in south-central Nebraska, USA. J Insect Conserv 3:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedick JC, Ratcliffe BC, Higley LG (2004) A new sampling protocol for the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Coleops Bull 58:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bedick JC, Hoback WW, Albrecht MC (2006) High water-loss rates and rapid dehydration in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus marginatus. Physiol Entomol 31:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci Bull 24:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleed A, Flowerday C (1989) An Atlas of the Sand Hills. Conservation and Survey Division, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  7. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32Google Scholar
  8. Butler SR, Harms R, Farnsworth-Hoback K, Koupal Keith, Jurzenski J, Hoback WW (2013) Standardized capture rates of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) using different trap protocols. J Insect Conserv 17:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantley A, Ripley B (2016) boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3-18Google Scholar
  10. Crawford PHC, Hoagland BW (2010) Using species distribution models to guide conservation at the state level: the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma. J Insect Conserv 14:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison AC, Hinkley DV (1997) Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carre G, Garcia Marquez JR, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitao PJ, Munkemuller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schroder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elith J, Leathwick JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Environmental Systems Research Institute [Esri] (2013) ArcMap v. 10.2.0.3348. Earth Systems Research Institute (Esri), RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  16. Franklin J (2010) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fry J, Xian G, Jin S, Dewitz J, Homer C, Yang L, Barnes C, Heold N, Wickham J (2011) Completion of the 2006 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 77:858–864. http://www.mrlc.gov/
  18. Gianessi LP, Marcelli MB (2000) Pesticide use in US crop production: 1997. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. http://www.worldclim.org/current
  21. Jensen JR (2004) Introductory digital image processing. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  22. Jurzenski JD (2012) Factors affecting the distribution and survival of endangered American burying beetles, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier. Dissertation, University of NebraskaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jurzenski JD, Jorgensen CF, Bishop A, Grosse R, Riens J, Hoback WW (2014) Identifying priority conservation areas for the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae), a habitat generalist. Syst Biodivers 12:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kozol AJ, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1988) The American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus: studies on the natural history of a declining species. Psyche 95:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leasure DR, Rupe DM, Phillips EA, Opine DR, Huxel GR (2012) Efficient new above-ground bucket traps produce comparable data to that of standard transects for endangered American burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus americanus Olivier). Coleops Bull 66:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22Google Scholar
  27. Lomolino MV, Creighton JC (1996) Habitat selection, breeding success and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 77:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lomolino MV, Creighton JC, Schnell GD, Certain DL (1995) Ecology and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Conserv Biol 9:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McPherron MM, Jurzenski J, Albrecht MC, Farnsworth-Hoback KM, Walker TL, Hoback WW (2012) Model of habitat suitability for American burying beetles in Nebraska’s Loess Canyons ecosystem. Trends Entomol 8:27–36Google Scholar
  30. Merrick MJ, Smith RJ (2004) Temperature regulation in burying beetles (Nicrophorus spp.: Coleoptera: Silphidae): effects of body size, morphology, and environmental temperature. J Exp Biol 207:723–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakagaki N (2007) Grids of agricultural pesticide use in the conterminous US, 1997. Version 2.0. United States Geological Survey, Reston. http://water.usgs.gov/GIS/metadata/usgswrd/XML/agpest97grd.xml
  32. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] (2012) Global DMSP-OLS nighttime lights time series 1992–2012 (Version 4). NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder. http://ngdc.noaa.gov/eog/download.html
  33. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
  34. Scott MP (1998) The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annu Rev Entomol 43:595–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Seirup L, Yetman G (2006) US Census Grids, 2000. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades. doi: 10.7927/H4B85623 Google Scholar
  36. Sikes DS, Raithel CJ (2002) A review of hypotheses of decline of the endangered American burying beetle (Silphidae: Nicrophorus americanus Olivier). J Insect Conserv 6:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sing R, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T (2005) ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21:7881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sørenson R, Zinko U, Seibert J (2006) On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] (1993) Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U. S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.Google Scholar
  40. United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] (2006) Digital general soil map of US. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Fort Worth. http://catalog.data.gov/harvest/object/69d5a4d1-a4ef-4208-bf4b-898c0b67a425/html
  41. United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (2013) Level III ecoregions of the conterminous United States. US EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD)-National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (NHEERL), Corvallis. ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/us/us_eco_l3.zip
  42. United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA], United States Geological Survey [USGS] (2012) National hydrography Dataset Plus-NHDPlus. Edition 2.10. http://www.horizon-systems.com/nhdplus/
  43. United States Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] (1991) American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) recovery plan. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner. http://www.fws.gov/southdakotafieldoffice/abbrecoveryplan.pdf
  44. United States Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] (2008a) American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS New England Field Office, ConcordGoogle Scholar
  45. United States Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] (2008b) American burying beetle Nebraska trapping protocol. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/endspp/protocols/ABBNebraskaTrappingProtocol2008.pdf
  46. United States Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS] (2014) American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus Oklahoma presence/absence live-trapping survey guidance. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, Tulsa. http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/oklahoma/ABB_Add_Info.htm
  47. United States Geological Survey [USGS] (2010) National Land Cover Version 1. US Geological Survey, National Biological Information Infrastructure, Gap Analysis Program (GAP). http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/Portal/DataDownload.html
  48. Walker JT Jr (1952) Ecological studies of the arthropods associated with certain decaying materials in four habitats. Ecology 38:262–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson DS, Knollenberg WG, Fudge J (1984) Species packing and temperature dependent competition among burying beetles (Siliphidae, Nicrophorus). Ecol Entomol 9:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.River Basin Center, Odum School of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of Entomology and Plant PathologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations