Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 701–710 | Cite as

The endangered damselfly Coenagrion ornatum in post-mining streams: population size, habitat requirements and restoration

  • Filip Tichanek
  • Robert Tropek
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The damselfly Coenagrion ornatum represents a threatened species of lowland headwater streams. Although the species is threatened in Western and Central Europe, it is known at a system of post-mining drainage ditches in the Radovesicka spoil heap (northwestern Bohemia, Czech Republic). This study aimed to estimate its population size in this post-mining stream system, and to explore habitat preferences of both its larvae and adults with respect to various environmental factors. The adults were captured-recaptured along 5.2 km of the ditches in June 2012; larvae were sampled in 64 study sites (i.e., 27-meter-long sections of the same ditches) in April 2012. The adult population size was estimated via log-linear models with the robust design on 4544 individuals (1560 ± 391 females and 2983 ± 298 males). Larvae were present in a third of the sections. GLMs revealed that both larvae and adults required emergent vegetation with a high proportion of Eleocharis spp. plants. The adults preferred the slow-flowing and shallow streams with 2-meter-high banksides covered by intermediately tall vegetation (~40 cm), whereas the larval abundance was supported by a high in-stream vegetation heterogeneity and a patchy cover of rocks on the streambeds. These results indicate that the post-mining streams could represent a valuable secondary habitat for the complete life cycle of this relatively large population of the endangered headwater specialist. Therefore, we recommend consideration of the conservation potential of such ditches during post-mining sites restoration and their subsequent management.

Keywords

Drainage ditches Headwaters Insect conservation Odonata Restoration ecology Secondary habitats 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Petr Šmilauer for numerous advice on statistics, to Zdeněk F. Fric, Petr Vlašánek and Pavel Šebek for advice on the population estimate models, to Iveta Patková for her assistance during the fieldwork, to Martin Waldhauser for discussions on the studied species and its larvae identification, to David Boukal and Martin Černý for useful comments on the earlier draft of the manuscript, and to Matthew Sweney for English proofreading. The study was financed by the Czech Science Foundation (P504/12/2525) and the institutional support Grant RVO:60077344.

Supplementary material

10841_2016_9902_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (923 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 923 KB)

References

  1. Allan JD, Flecker AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters. Bioscience 43:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen KA, Thompson DJ (2014) Population size and survival estimates for the rare damselflies, Coenagrion mercuriale and Ischnura pumilio. Insect Conserv Divers 7:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baillargeon S, Rivest LP (2014) Rcapture: loglinear models for capture-recapture experiments. R Package Version. doi: 10.18637/jss.v019.i05 Google Scholar
  4. Beisel JN, Usseglio-Polatera P, Moreteau JC (1998) The spatial heterogeneity of a river bottom: a key factor determining macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 422:163–171Google Scholar
  5. Beneš J, Kepka P, Konvička M (2003) Limestone quarries as refuges for European xerophilous butterflies. Conserv Biol 17:1058–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Briand LC, Emam KE, Freimut BG, Laitenberger O (2000) A comprehensive evaluation of capture-recapture models for estimating software defect content. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26:518–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchabililty. Biometrics 45:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbet PS (1980.) Biology of Odonata. Annu Rev Entomol 25:189–217Google Scholar
  9. Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Amico F, Darblade S, Avignon S, Blanc-Manel S, Ormerod SJ (2004) Odonates as indicators of shallow lake restoration by liming: comparing adult and larval responses. Restor Ecol 12:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darroch SE, Fienberg G, Glonek B, Junker B (1993) A three sample multiple capture recapture approach to the census population estimation with heterogeneous catchability. J Am Stat Assoc 88:1137–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkstra KDB, Lewington R (2006) Field guide to the dragonflies of Britain and Europe including western Turkey and north-western Africa. British Wildlife Publishing, DorsetGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolný A, Harabiš F (2012) Underground mining can contribute to freshwater biodiversity conservation: allogenic succession forms suitable habitats for dragonflies. Biol Conserv 145:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolný A, Harabiš F, Mižičová H (2014) Home range, movement, and distribution patterns of the threatened dragonfly Sympetrum depressiusculum (Odonata: Libellulidae): a thousand times greater territory to protect? PLoS One 9:e100408CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolný A, Harabiš F, Bárta D (2016) Vážky (Insecta: Odonata) České republiky. Academia, PragueGoogle Scholar
  16. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox J (2003) Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. J Stat Softw 8:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harabiš F (2016) High diversity of odonates in post-mining areas: meta-analysis uncovers potential pitfalls associated with the formation and management of valuable habitats. Ecol Eng 90:438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harabiš F, Dolný A (2015) Necessity for the conservation of drainage systems as last refugia for threatened damselfly species, Coenagrion ornatum. Insect Conserv Divers 8:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harabiš F, Tichanek F, Tropek R (2013) Dragonflies of freshwater pools in lignite spoil heaps: restoration management, habitat structure and conservation value. Ecol Eng 55:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heneberg P, Bogusch P, Řehounek J (2012) Sandpits provide critical refuge for bees and wasps (Hymenoptera: Apocrita). J Insect Conserv 17:473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horváth G, Malik P, Kriska G, Wildermuth H (2007) Ecological traps for dragonflies in a cemetery: the attraction of Sympetrum species (Odonata: Libellulidae) by horizontally polarizing black gravestones. Freshw Biol 52:1700–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalkman VJ, Boudot JP, Bernard R, Conze KJ, de Knijf G, Dyatlova E, Ferreira S, Jović M, Ott J, Riservato E, Sahlén G (2010) European red list of dragonflies. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  24. Kutcher TE, Bried JT (2014) Adult Odonata conservatism as an indicator of freshwater wetland condition. Ecol Indic 38:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Malmqvist B, Rundle S (2002) Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ Conserv 29:134–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer JL, Strayer DL, Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Helfman GS, Leonard NE (2007) The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:86–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muotka T, Laasonen P (2002) Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. J Appl Ecol 39:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muotka T, Paavola R, Haapala A, Novikmec M, Laasonen P (2002) Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biol Conserv 105:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Painter D (1998) Effects of ditch management patterns on Odonata at Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire, UK. Biol Conserv 84:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pedersen TCM, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Madsen TV (2006) Effects of stream restoration and management on plant communities in lowland streams. Freshw Biol 51:161–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raebel EM, Merckx T, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thompson DJ (2010) The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys. J Insect Conserv 14:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rivest LP, Baillargeon S (2007) Applications and extensions of Chao’s moment estimator for the size of a closed population. Biometrics 63:999–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rivest LP, Daigle G (2004) Loglinear models for the robust design in mark-recapture experiments. Biometrics 60:100–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rouquette JR, Thompson DJ (2005) Habitat associations of the endangered damselfly, Coenagrion mercuriale, in a water meadow ditch system in southern England. Biol Conserv 123:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sand-Jensen K, Riis T, Vestergaard O, Larsen SE (2000) Macrophyte decline in Danish lakes and streams over the past 100 years. J Ecol 88:1030–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Šigutová H, Šigut M, Dolný A (2015) Intensive fish ponds as ecological traps for dragonflies: an imminent threat to the endangered species Sympetrum depressiusculum (Odonata: Libellulidae). J Insect Conserv 19:961–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tichanek F, Tropek R (2015) Conservation value of post-mining headwaters: drainage channels at a lignite spoil heap harbour threatened stream dragonflies. J Insect Conserv 19:975–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tropek R, Kadlec T, Karesova P, Spitzer L, Kocarek P, Malenovsky I, Banar P, Tuf IH, Hejda M, Konvicka M (2010) Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants. J Appl Ecol 47:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tropek R, Cerna I, Straka J, Cizek O, Konvicka M (2013) Is coal combustion the last chance for vanishing insects of inland drift sand dunes in Europe? Biol Conserv 162:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vojar J, Doležalová J, Solský M, Smolová D, Kopecký O, Kadlec T, Knapp M (2016) Spontaneous succession on spoil banks supports amphibian diversity and abundance. Ecol Eng 90:278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waldhauser M, Mikát M (2010) New records of Coenagrion ornatum in the Czech Republic (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Libellula 29:29–46Google Scholar
  43. Wildermuth H (2008) Habitat requirements of Orthetrum coerulescens and management of a secondary habitat in a highly man-modified landscape (Odonata: Libellulidae). Int J Odonatol 11:261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Entomology, Biology CentreCzech Academy of SciencesCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of ScienceCharles University in PraguePrague 2Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations